Piffle.
It’s easy to see what they’re doing here. They’re deploying the fact that all women are complex, because humans are complex, to pretend that the word itself is complex in the same way. It’s not.
By the same token the definition of “oak tree” is not particularly complex, but oak trees themselves are complex. This simple comparison could be used for many many many specific examples.
The British Museum is complex, but locating it on a map is not.
The Great Wall of China is complex, but defining it is not.
Oceans are complex, but a basic definition of the word is not.
It should be a labeled fallacy of some kind to pretend that defining a word is like writing a biography or history or scientific paper about the word being defined.

Leave a Reply