The simmering distrust

Furthermore, the relationship between Donnie from Queens and the intelligence professionals is tanking. That could be a problem.

The simmering distrust between Donald Trump and U.S. intelligence agencies escalated into open antagonism Saturday after the president-elect mocked a CIA report that Russian operatives had intervened in the U.S. presidential election to help him win.

The growing tensions set up a potential showdown between Trump and the nation’s top intelligence officials during what some of those officials describe as the most complex threat environment in decades.

Trump’s reaction will probably deepen an existing rift between Trump and the agencies and raised questions about how the government’s 16 spying agencies will function in his administration on matters such as counterterrorism and cyberwarfare. On Friday, members of Trump’s transition team dismissed the CIA’s assessments about Iraq’s stockpile of weapons of mass destruction.

“Given his proclivity for revenge combined with his notorious thin skin, this threatens to result in a lasting relationship of distrust and ill will between the president and the intelligence community,” said Paul Pillar, former deputy director of the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center.

Oh well. It’s not as if we need accurate intelligence on who is stockpiling what kinds of weapons.

U.S. intelligence officials described mounting concern and confusion about how to proceed in an administration so openly hostile to their function and role. “I don’t know what the end game is here,” a senior U.S. intelligence official said. “After Jan. 20,” the official said, referring to Inauguration Day, “we’re in uncharted territory.”

Pillar added: “Everything Trump has indicated with regard to his character and tendencies for vindictiveness might be worse” than former president Richard Nixon, who also had a dysfunctional relationship with the intelligence community.

He’s almost certain to be worse. He has Nixon’s flaws along with a lot of flaws of his own. He’s more nakedly aggressive, more entitled, more conceited, more used to getting his own way and trampling on everyone else – more ignorant, more stupid, more unwilling to learn anything.

Intelligence agencies are tracking Russia’s military interventions in Syria and Ukraine, Iran’s compliance with the nuclear deal, North Korea’s nuclear weapons testing and China’s maritime challenges in Asia and theft of trade secrets. The CIA is operating a covert program to arm and train moderate rebels in Syria to overcome the brutal rule of President Bashar al-Assad, even as Trump has praised Russia’s approach to backing Assad.

Since his electoral triumph last month, Trump has attended only a limited number of intelligence briefings, and he appointed as his national security adviser retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn, who was forced out of his job as head of the Defense Intelligence Agency by Obama administration officials.

Mavericks! They’re all a buncha mavericks, fixing the intelligence agencies by getting all mavericky up in there.

Or, to put it another way, this isn’t going to go well.

Comments

6 responses to “The simmering distrust”

  1. Ben Avatar

    Trump already knows more than those CIA elites. He doesn’t need them. In his free time—in between Celebrity Apprentice tapings—he can take charge of the CIA. Problem solved.

  2. RJW Avatar

    Trump’s minders have a point, it was the CIA and various other spooks who confidently assured the US government that Saddam Hussein was stockpiling WMD, he wasn’t.

    Of course we need accurate intelligence, however the CIA did not provide it before the Gulf War. It was amazing that the agency was unable to ‘find’ any WMD, just to save its reputation.

  3. ZugTheMegasaurus Avatar
    ZugTheMegasaurus

    It all comes back to the same root issue: as a non-politician, he is not qualified for a job in politics. At least Nixon (or whoever your favorite worst-president-ever might be) understood the job and actively sought it out as a politician. Trump does not have any conception of politics; I don’t think he could pass an elementary-school-level civics quiz. He’s Dunning-Kruger in an ill-fitting suit.

  4. Holms Avatar

    Reast easy, Americans – he is well supplied with intel. From Infowars.

  5. Lady Mondegreen Avatar
    Lady Mondegreen

    @RJW #2

    Trump’s minders have a point, it was the CIA and various other spooks who confidently assured the US government that Saddam Hussein was stockpiling WMD, he wasn’t.

    That’s not what happened; it’s what the Bush administration claimed happened.

    http://www.patheos.com/blogs/dispatches/2016/12/11/cia-russians-definitely-hacked-interfere-election/

    No, it isn’t. In fact, the CIA’s assessments of Hussein’s WMD program was far more circumspect than the Bush administration claimed. The intelligence agencies are generally very measured in the information they present in such assessments, rating their certainty of every statement in it, and they did that with respect to Iraq and WMDs as well. It wasn’t the CIA who said that, it was the Bush administration. The CIA assessment was far less conclusive.

    In fact, Dick Cheney famously went to Langley to pressure the CIA to make a stronger case for it. That’s how that nonsense about Nigerian yellowcake uranium came to be made public. The CIA found that claim highly suspect, but the Bush administration was desperate to justify the war they were going to undertake no matter what the evidence said. It wasn’t the CIA who whiffed on Hussein and WMDs, it was the Bush administration who ignored their sober, measured analysis to present a sensationalist and highly dishonest marketing campaign for invasion.

  6. RJW Avatar

    Lady Mondegreen,

    Of course, I always take the word of an organization of professional liars and deceivers, I’m not talking about politicians btw. I wonder if Trump is a colonel in the FSB/KGB like Assange, he might need Putin’s help to fight his enemies in the CIA and the US Establishment.