All entries by this author

Seriously?

May 1st, 2010 11:41 am | By

Some more thoughts on tits and cleavage and the Cuddy Effect and reservations. First of all, to clarify again, I’m not criticizing Jen or her joke; I am expressing reservations about some of the reactions to some of the reservations about the joke.

The overall yay-cleavage line is that women should be free to display cleavage (yes, of course, and are any of the critics really saying otherwise?), and that therefore displaying cleavage is an unqualified good. The second claim doesn’t follow. Displaying cleavage could be mixed, or it could be an unqualified bad. The fact that it shouldn’t be forbidden or illegal doesn’t mean it’s terrific. There are more than two stark possibilities.

Okay so what’s my problem? … Read the rest



The limits of free speech on campus *

May 1st, 2010 | Filed by

Holocause denial should not be a crime, but it should be dismissable incompetence.… Read the rest



Some like God, others prefer the Hubble *

May 1st, 2010 | Filed by

With so many pressing problems on Earth, how can we afford not to try to focus on the things that unite us? … Read the rest



Religious beliefs should not trump the law *

May 1st, 2010 | Filed by

If we had a large population of Aztec sun-worshippers here, would we accept their right to the occasional human sacrifice?… Read the rest



Judges speak

Apr 30th, 2010 5:14 pm | By

Lord Justice Laws said

The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other.

If they did, those out in the cold would be less than citizens, and our constitution would be on the way to a theocracy, which is of necessity autocratic.

The law of a theocracy is dictated without option to the people, not made by their judges and governments.

Beautiful. Compare the ruling in FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION v OBAMA:

However, religious expression by the government that is inspirational and comforting to a believer may seem exclusionary or even threatening to someone who does not

Read the rest


Let me count the ways

Apr 30th, 2010 4:58 pm | By

I love the new place. (Take a bow, Josh and Cam.) I love the search engine. I was looking for something a few minutes ago, something to do with the Motoons and reactions in Denmark; I searched with “Motoons,” which produced a lot of items but not the right one, so I tried “Denmark” which brought it right up – along with a surprising array of other stuff just on the first page. I wouldn’t have guessed I mention Denmark that often! But I do – not always because of the Motoons. It just gave a nice sense of a rich resource…It’s a beautiful search engine.… Read the rest



FFR v Obama: the ruling *

Apr 30th, 2010 | Filed by

Encouraging all citizens to engage in prayer is an inherently religious exercise that serves no secular function.… Read the rest



Multitasking

Apr 30th, 2010 11:49 am | By

I didn’t say anything about “boobquake” because although I thought it was quite funny and a good riposte to ridiculous clerical misogyny, I also have reservations about women joining in with laddism – plus I hate the word “boobs.” They’re tits, dammit! Like the birds.

But Miranda Hale said anything and Jerry Coyne said anything, and then they got some rather strong reactions, so I thought I would say anything.

A commenter at Why Evolution is True made the point succinctly:

There’s a big difference between paying attention to what women are saying and paying attention to their breasts. If women want attention to be paid to what they have to say, they should stop trying to get

Read the rest


Jesus and Mo are shocked, shocked at the FO *

Apr 30th, 2010 | Filed by

Why, they haven’t even fired the employee responsible! They just moved him to a different…wait…… Read the rest



A deeply unedifying collision

Apr 30th, 2010 10:17 am | By

Carey turns purple in the face and insists that yes religious believers do too so have a right to treat people badly just because their religion says to.

The former archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey today accused judges of moving towards a new “secular state” that would downgrade the rights of religious believers. Attacking a “deeply worrying” court ruling, Carey claimed the judiciary was now tipping the legal balance against believers in “a deeply unedifying collision of human rights”.

The new secular state would downgrade the rights of religious believers to say no ew ick I won’t serve/marry/advise/cut the hair of gay people because I don’t want to because I think they’re gross and god thinks so too. Those … Read the rest



Sacked Christian counsellor’s appeal bid dismissed *

Apr 30th, 2010 | Filed by

Lord Justice Laws said legislation for the protection of views held purely on religious grounds cannot be justified.… Read the rest



Ex-archbish pitches fit at ‘secular’ judges *

Apr 30th, 2010 | Filed by

Lord Justice Laws: “The law of a theocracy is dictated without option to the people, not made by their judges and governments.”… Read the rest



Mojave cross ruling a blow to First Amendment *

Apr 30th, 2010 | Filed by

Supreme Court sends message: the government can treat a Christian symbol as a national emblem and display it on public property.… Read the rest



No separation of church and state for you! *

Apr 30th, 2010 | Filed by

Majority on Supreme Court rules that a cross is not a Christian symbol.… Read the rest



Westboro Baptist will picket McMillen graduation *

Apr 29th, 2010 | Filed by

“[We] will picket the graduation of Itawamba Agricultural High School to remind the parents, teachers and students of this nation that God” you know the rest.… Read the rest



Women’s Rights Are Called ‘Cultural Imperialism’

Apr 29th, 2010 | By Lauryn Oates

A few weeks ago, I sat in a meeting in Vancouver. During a boring bit, I was fooling around with Google, and I stumbled upon a paper entitled, “The (Re)production of Afghan Women” by one Melanie Butler. I recognized the name as I had been interviewed by Butler for this paper, which was published in 2008. Melanie had not really explained the actual topic of what became her graduate thesis in political science at the University of British Columbia, nor sent me a final copy of her paper, nor used any of my statements from the interview in her final paper, which might have interfered inconveniently with the narrative she was weaving. She knew what she would say before she … Read the rest



“I consider God’s law and that of his prophet above any other law”

Apr 29th, 2010 11:41 am | By

Nigeria’s Senator Ahmad Sani Yerima assures us that he has done nothing wrong. What a relief.

Ahmad Sani Yerima, 49, told the BBC that his fourth wife was not 13, but would not say how old she was.

He denied breaking the law but said he would not respect any law that contradicted his religious beliefs.

Ah good; how noble, how pious, how devout, how holy. If any pesky law contradicts his “religious belief” that he is allowed to fuck a girl who is too young to give her life away and too small through the pelvis to bear a child safely, why then he will bravely and nobly ignore that law in favour of the “religious belief” that … Read the rest



Nigeria: Senator Sani says girl is not 13 *

Apr 29th, 2010 | Filed by

Refuses to say how old she is, says he does not care what women’s groups think.… Read the rest



Mediawatchwatch on a bad week for free expression *

Apr 29th, 2010 | Filed by

Harry Taylor was sentenced, Molly Norris got scared, Kurt Westergaard and Lars Vilks got more of the usual.… Read the rest



Teasing the pope is much worse than raping children

Apr 29th, 2010 9:15 am | By

Omigod omigod omigod somebody insulted the Catholic church!! And even the pope!!! Omigod omigod.

The memorandum, apparently written by staff planning events for the four-day visit by Pope Benedict XVI, suggested he might like to start a helpline for abused children, sack “dodgy” bishops, open an abortion ward, launch his own brand of condoms, preside at a civil partnership, perform forward rolls with children, apologise for the Spanish armada and sing a song with the Queen.

But it’s all right, the somebody’s bosses apologized and apologized and apologized.

Jim Murphy, the cabinet minister overseeing the visit and a practising Catholic, failed to see the funny side of it, describing the memo as “absolutely despicable. It’s vile, it’s insulting, it’s

Read the rest