My contribution to the CisF question about an atheist schism.… Read the rest
All entries by this author
Debate or Change
Nov 4th, 2009 | By George TaylorIt is over 200 years since the Enlightenment offered the dream of freeing the Western world from the dead hand of the God of Abraham (TGOA), yet we still go round in circles debating his existence. “You cannot prove the existence of God.” “You cannot disprove it.” And so on ad nauseam, while the uncommitted and uninterested shrug their shoulders and say the jury is out, so forget it. One or other church still has its hooks into the fabric of most states in the Old and New Worlds, militant Islam has become a rallying point for protest against real or perceived Western imperialism in the Middle East, epitomised by the creation of the state of Israel, itself a permanent … Read the rest
Jumping up and down on the parapet
Nov 4th, 2009 10:05 am | By Ophelia BensonMy contribution to the Comment is Free question is posted. One or two commenters agreed with my suggestion that I perhaps wrote a little more carefully than Ruse did. It’s funny about that – how often we encounter some I’m-an-atheist-but critic shouting wild insults and demented misrepresentations at us in the very act of telling us to stop being so wild and demented. It causes me to suspect something resembling an agenda, much as I hate to say anything so intemperate and rash.… Read the rest
Piety and wit combined
Nov 4th, 2009 7:53 am | By Ophelia BensonAn erudite thoughtful man by the name of Greg Craven, who is vice-chancellor of the Australian Catholic University, has written an elegant, reasoned, careful piece on atheism and atheists in The Age. It would persuade anyone who read it with an open mind.
From time immemorial, this world has been troubled by plagues. From bogong moths in Canberra to frogs in biblical Egypt, unwelcome and unlovely creatures have the awkward habit of turning up in bulk. Just now, we are facing one of our largest and least appealing infestations. Somewhat in advance of summer’s blowflies, we are beset by atheists.
That’s a good beginning, don’t you think? Invoking plagues, comparing atheists to moths and frogs, saying we’re unwelcome and … Read the rest
Climate Change Is a Legally Protected Belief
Nov 3rd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘Capable, if genuinely held, of being a philosophical belief for the purpose of the 2003 Religion and Belief Regulations.’… Read the rest
We All Hates Them Bad Atheists
Nov 3rd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘The New Atheist movement is being led by several egomaniac intolerant fundamentalists.’… Read the rest
Azerbaijan: Government Closes Some Mosques
Nov 3rd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonIn adopting new law on religion, Azerbaijan says it has had to react to the growing threat of Wahhabism.… Read the rest
Austin Dacey on Atheism 3.0
Nov 3rd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonToday we should ask, what is the proper context of the current conversation about atheism and religion?… Read the rest
Austin Dacey Asks: Why Replace Religion?
Nov 3rd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThe social space vacated by religion could be filled by a patchwork of independent institutions.… Read the rest
Sketching faces for the faceless, giving voices to the unheard
Nov 3rd, 2009 | By Tasneem KhalilThe best place to sell copies of the Quran is in front of the mosque, my grandfather once told me. I begin this piece with that advice in mind. To borrow a phrase from Ophelia Benson, this is not about a donation from a deity, but this is about a congregation of the faithful. This is about introducing a new independent magazine of human rights journalism to one of the largest forums of humanists online – Butterflies and Wheels. If you are a regular at B&W, I take that your faith in humanity, freedom and liberty counts above everything else and that is why you might be interested about this new magazine we have launched.
I am sure some of … Read the rest
Lots of things
Nov 3rd, 2009 10:19 am | By Ophelia BensonAustin Dacey considers ‘the latest critics of the new atheists: the old humanists’.
Humanists are right to think that there is more to life than atheism, but wrong to think that they are the ones to provide it. It is not the job of religion’s critics to organize a replacement.
Indeed not, especially since we wouldn’t know where to begin (which is part of Austin’s point). It’s not, after all, as if humanists and/or atheists are like theism turned inside out – carrying all the same baggage but with minus-signs replacing plus-signs; it’s not as if we come complete with our own atheist music and atheist prayers and atheist temples and atheist holidays and atheist hats. It’s also not … Read the rest
Play Gender Bingo
Nov 2nd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonAre you called rude and abrasive while your male colleagues who say rude things are simply ‘assertive’?… Read the rest
PZ on Ruse on Atheism
Nov 2nd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonWatch out for the Deep Rift!… Read the rest
Coyne on Sullivan on Scientology
Nov 2nd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonHe’s right that Scientology is absurd, but…there’s another thing…… Read the rest
Michael Ruse Scolds The Atheists
Nov 2nd, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonHe’s not quite as careful as he might be…… Read the rest
Atheists quarrel amongst themselves
Nov 2nd, 2009 11:01 am | By Ophelia BensonMichael Ruse really could have been a good deal more careful. It’s only manners, and it’s also only sensible – flailing at an enemy that doesn’t exist is just a waste of time. (Never mind Don Quixote – he was fun at dinner but he was a bore about the windmills.)
There are several reasons why we atheists are squabbling – I will speak only for myself but I doubt I am atypical. First, non-believer though I may be, I do not think (as do the new atheists) that all religion is necessarily evil and corrupting.
See? That’s really careless. Of course ‘the new athesits’ don’t (all) think that. I’m not sure any of them think that, but we … Read the rest
No eggshells
Nov 1st, 2009 3:55 pm | By Ophelia BensonGood stuff from Jason Rosenhouse.
The problem comes when outreach to religious groups becomes a euphemism for bashing people who take a less cozy view of the science/religion issue. Pointing to the diversity of religious opinion is fine, dismissing as fringe extremists people who dissent from NOMA is not.
What I keep saying. It’s othering, and it’s othering of people who are notoriously already The People It’s Right to Despise.
… Read the restI believe a long term solution to this problem does not lie in moving people towards relatively more reasonable sorts of religious belief, but rather by moving towards a society in which religious belief is accorded far less respect than it currently is. Certainly that is a very long-term
Sensibilities and sense
Nov 1st, 2009 3:54 pm | By Ophelia BensonI’ve been having a long and interesting discussion with Jean about sensitivities and what one should defer to and how to figure that out.
I do think there’s a prima facie duty to defer to other people’s sensibilities. “Prima facie” means–at first glance. So the rule isn’t absolute, but it’s always in play. Sometimes a violation is “worth it” and sometimes a violation isn’t. Contrary to what Donohue evidently thinks, every transgression isn’t worth a big fuss.
After a lot of words and a lot of consideration, I’ve ended up (for the moment anyway) still fundamentally suspicious of the whole idea, albeit with exceptions for sensibilities that really do matter – around death, mourning, objects with sentimental value, that kind … Read the rest
Is Scientology a Religion or a Business or Both?
Nov 1st, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonIt is easier to arrive at a ‘just price’ for beer and jam than for purification.… Read the rest