Under pressure from Conference of Catholic Bishops, lawmakers added language infringing right to abortion.… Read the rest
All entries by this author
Catholic Power Over US Legislation
Nov 10th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonPelosi got permission from Conference of Catholic Bishops, consulted with a cardinal in Rome. … Read the rest
Catholic Bishops Ruled on Healthcare Bill
Nov 10th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonSeveral Democrats said they consulted Catholic bishops; one said he needs bishop’s approval to vote yes.… Read the rest
They thought of Isambard Kingdom Brunel, did they?
Nov 9th, 2009 5:33 pm | By Ophelia BensonThe pope says it’s kosher – John Henry Newman did miraculously cure Deacon Jack Sullivan of a nasty spinal problem.
… Read the restDeacon Sullivan, 71, said he prayed for the cardinal’s help in August 2001 after being diagnosed with severe spinal disc and vertebrae deformities, a condition, he said, which left him “bent double” and in “excruciating pain”. The deacon said he had watched a television programme in the US about Cardinal Newman and had then prayed to him first in June 2000. He said: “The following morning I got out of bed pain-free, whereas previously I was in agony. I thought, ‘wow, what’s happening?’. My prayer was answered to Cardinal Newman.” He said he then went through a pain-free period, which
Life in Pakistan
Nov 9th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘Terrorists are following us everywhere: in mosques, shopping centres, hotels, restaurants and even educational institutions.’… Read the rest
Long-dead Cardinal Cures Spinal Injury
Nov 9th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonUS deacon says he was cured of a crippling spinal condition after praying to John Henry Newman.… Read the rest
Rid the World of Female Genital Mutilation
Nov 9th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonDespite the best efforts of conservative forces, people all over Africa are starting to question the practice.… Read the rest
Lecture on Beheading Infidels Perhaps a Clue
Nov 9th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonSaying non-Muslims were infidels condemned to hell who should be set on fire perhaps another.… Read the rest
Steven Poole on Sen’s ‘The Idea of Justice’
Nov 9th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘Sen is exquisitely civilised in his disagreements with other thinkers, even while he is elegantly trashing whole schools of economic and social thought.’… Read the rest
American-style Creationism in Turkey
Nov 9th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThe ‘proofs’ that evolution is wrong came directly from US proponents of Christian creationism and ID.… Read the rest
Karen Armstrong, time-traveling pollster
Nov 8th, 2009 4:22 pm | By Ophelia BensonKaren Armstrong’s breezy way with facts and references can sometimes produce declarations that are really funny. On the first page of chapter 10, ‘Atheism,’ for instance, she starts with a preacher launching ‘a crusdade’ against Deism in 1790 and goes on with the rise of Evangelicalism into the 1830s. No references of course. The next paragraph starts ‘On the frontiers, nearly 40 percent of Americans felt slighted by the aristocratic republican government…’
!!! Really?! How the hell does she know that? She doesn’t even say at what particular moment in time that bizarrely exact claim was (according to her) true, and she certainly doesn’t say how she knows or how anyone else knows either. That’s not surprising, because no one … Read the rest
Words are not interchangeable
Nov 8th, 2009 12:41 pm | By Ophelia BensonSholto Byrnes says aha – but his aha depends on a confusion of terms, a lumping together of different words with different meanings as if they all meant the same thing. That kind of aha is not a good kind, because people can just say, sharply or compassionately depending on temperament, ‘oh dear, you’ve made a muddle there.’
Let’s be clear: they could now be afforded rights under law specifically formulated to protect religion and belief. And those are two words that many scientists, rationalists and atheists don’t like to be associated with at all.
Nonsense. We have no problem ‘being associated with’ belief; we don’t claim to have no beliefs or to want no beliefs or to object to … Read the rest
Sholto Byrnes Says What Atheists Think
Nov 8th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonGets it wrong.… Read the rest
Plymouth University Axes Steiner Course
Nov 8th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThe educational wing of the UK Anthroposophy movement will be deeply hurt.… Read the rest
The Right to Access to Quackery
Nov 8th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonIt’s a mistake to try to regulate ‘alternative’ medicine as if it were real medicine.… Read the rest
When Religion is the Opposite of an Opiate
Nov 8th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonIslamism actively seeks to create a group identity and a sense of grievance, and often succeeds.… Read the rest
New Zealand Self-made ‘Bishop’ as Daddy
Nov 8th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonHe’s the ‘spiritual father’ and all the male members of the church are his ‘spiritual sons.’… Read the rest
Railing at MPs While the City Gets Away With It
Nov 8th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonIf Labour ministers took on the City, they would hear raging voters calling them as bad as the bankers.… Read the rest
Armstrong’s Wittgenstein
Nov 7th, 2009 4:29 pm | By Ophelia BensonMore of Armstrong playing at Grown Up Scholarship. On page 279 she lays down the law about Wittgenstein for almost the whole page.
In his later years, Wittgenstein changed his mind. He no longer believed that language should merely state facts but acknowledged that words also issued commands, made promises, and expressed emotion. Turning his back on the early modern ambition to establish a single method of arrivingat truth, Wittgenstein now maintained that there were an infinite number of social discourses. So it was a grave mistake “to make religious belief a matter of evidence in the way that science is a matter of evidence”
And there we have our first reference: it is to “Ludwig Wittgenstein, Lectures and Conversations … Read the rest
Are You Offended? You Are Offended, Right?
Nov 7th, 2009 | Filed by Ophelia BensonYou must be offended. That was offensive. I would be offended if I were you. Why aren’t you offended?… Read the rest