Calls me the scourge of magical thinking chiz chiz.
Author: Ophelia Benson
-
Kristof on the bishop v hospitals and women
The hospital rejected the bishop’s demand that it never again terminate a pregnancy to save the life of a mother. The bishop is still at large.
-
Russell Blackford on Sam Harris and moral realism
Why, for example, should I not prefer my own well-being, or the well-being of the people I love, to overall, or global, well-being?
-
UK deporting Brenda Namigadde back to Uganda
The British Foreign Office advises visitors to Uganda that ‘homosexuality is illegal and social tolerance of it is low.’
-
Gay Uganda on David Kato
“Hang them”….! His was the face on the front page. Next to Bishop Ssenyonjo.
-
A short break
As you may have seen (I think I’ve mentioned it), I’m doing a talk in Vancouver tomorrow, so I’m away for three days. Have a tranquil yet quietly thrilling weekend.
-
No wisdom
It’s so horrible about David Kato.
A school teacher, he became a prominent campaigner in recent years, especially taking on the Anti-Homosexuality Bill, which called for the death sentence to be imposed for some homosexual acts…
Ms Kimani said he was one of the most visible gay campaigners in Uganda, serving as the litigation officer for the group Sexual Minorities Uganda (Smug)…
He often faced accusations that he was trying to groom children, which Ms Pepe, who worked with him at Smug, blamed on “religious propaganda”.
“These allegations were of course were false,” she said…
Rebecca McDowall, a student in London who met Mr Kato at an event recently, said he was aware that what he was doing was dangerous.
“He was so inspirational as a public speaker,” she told the BBC. “He looked like a small unassuming person but when he got up, you couldn’t help but sit up and listen.”
Ms Pepe said Mr Kato’s family and friends are still in shock.
“We spoke to Waswa yesterday, he’s equally devastated – he’s trying to hold it together but he’s shattered because of course they were really close,” she said.
She and Mr Kato were chatting on the phone about an hour before he was attacked – and he had been laughing and joking.
“I keep hearing his laughter in my head – it breaks my heart,” she said.
Horrible. I have nothing wiser to say.
-
David Kato remembered as loud and proud
“He was so inspirational as a public speaker. He looked like a small unassuming person but when he got up, you couldn’t help but sit up and listen.”
-
David Kato spoke to the BBC in 2010
“David Kato’s death is a tragic loss to the human rights community,” said HRW’s Maria Burnett.
-
Uganda: gay rights activist killed
David Kato was the most outspoken gay rights advocate in Uganda. Yesterday he was beaten to death with a hammer.
-
Most of the video is too graphic to broadcast
But you can see the grinning man clashing two stones together to celebrate after Siddiqa is killed.
-
Is a kirpan a religious freedom or a weapon?
If a kirpan is allowed in schools, should it be allowed in the National Assembly?
-
Hundreds of rocks are thrown at her head
As the Afghan Government continues its wooing overtures to the Taliban, and Karzai whines about “foreign interference” in his latest meddling in Afghan parliamentary democracy, the Taliban execute a couple by stoning them to death in Kunduz province in front of a crowd of hundreds.
The crime? The couple fell in love and attempted to elope, beyond a community where relationships based on mutual love and attraction, and not on money and perversion, might have a chance of fulfillment.
The BBC has short clips of the horrific murders, noting that “most of the video is too graphic to be shown.” The event is described as follows:
The video begins with Siddqa, a 25-year-old woman, standing waist-deep in a hole in the ground.
She is entirely hidden in a blue burka. Hundreds of men from the village are gathered as two mullahs pass sentence. As Taliban fighters look on, the sentence is passed and she is found guilty of adultery.
The stoning lasts two minutes. Hundreds of rocks – some larger than a man’s fist – are thrown at her head and body. She tries to crawl out of the hole, but is beaten back by the stones. A boulder is then thrown at her head, her burka is soaked in blood, and she collapses inside the hole.
Incredibly Siddqa was still alive. The mullahs are heard saying she should be left alone. But a Taliban fighter steps forward with a rifle and she is shot three times.
Then her lover, Khayyam, is brought to the crowd. His hands are tied behind his back. Before he is blindfolded he looks into the mobile phone camera. He appears defiant.
The attack on him is even more ferocious. His body, lying face down, jerks as the rocks meet their target. He is heard to be crying, but is soon silent.
In between the murders, a man is showing clacking two large stones together, deliriously excited at the prospect of participating in what amounts to a viciously drawn out execution. It’s a sunny day and hundreds are gathered to witness this crime, all of them undeniably complicit in it. It’s an almost unbelievable communal deficit of conscience, were it not preserved on film proving this scene devoid of humanity really did take place, in all of its grisly actuality.
A Taliban spokesperson defends the stoning, quipping about the dangers of “foreign thinking” in Afghanistan (in reference to people who call stoning to death inhuman). A spectator had used a mobile phone, one product of demonic “foreign thinking” to record this atrocity, standing idly by, gleefully filming the scene as if it were an amusing event he happened to pass by.
It’s an indefensible abomination, and nothing should signal more clearly that the Taliban have not reformed, that they will never reform. ‘Taliban’ and ‘reform’ are opposing forces in the 21st century, and the longer the Afghan Government takes to realize this, the more destructive their pandering to these degenerates will be for the citizens of Afghanistan. To even suggest power sharing or deal-making with the death-cult psychopaths that are the Taliban is a searing insult to the people of Afghanistan, and a signed death warrant to all of the country’s free thinkers, democrats, intellectuals, feminists and idealists.
Today is the International Day of Commemoration in Memory of the Victims of the Holocaust, an occasion that should perhaps inspire a solemn reminder to confront atrocities and crimes against humanity. Nearly 70 years have passed since the Holocaust and the declaration of “never again”, which set the stage for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. How is it that we continue to condone the barbaric treatment of human beings in other lands? How have we reached a point, in 2011, where we would contemplate allowing any place in the world for the ideology of the Taliban, and its ugly manifestations in the form of a bludgeoned young woman and her lover?
How very far we have yet to go.
About the Author
Lauryn Oates is a Canadian human rights activist, gender and education specialist who has been advocating for the rights of Afghan women since 1996. She is currently Projects Director for Canadian Women for Women in Afghanistan, as well as a founding member of the Canada Afghanistan Solidarity Committee. -
A sewer
Ew.
Slightly afraid and slightly queasy in advance, I hunted up Glenn Beck’s website called “the Blaze” and looked for something on Frances Fox Piven.
Ew.
And people think violent rhetoric might be a problem…I can’t imagine why, can you?
-
Demonstrations, tenability, reasons
So now we’re disputing whether or not goddy claims can be untenable even if they’re not, technically, demonstrably false.
I think they can. It’s true that it’s not possible to demonstrate that goddy claims are false. (When Russell first met Wittgenstein, the latter drove the former crazy by refusing to agree that there couldn’t be [or that he couldn’t know that there wasn’t?] an invisible rhinoceros in the middle of Russell’s study, or some such thing.)
But that doesn’t make goddy claims tenable. It doesn’t make them plausible, either. There are myriad reasons that are short of demonstration but are still good reasons not to believe “God” exists.
To repeat the bit I quoted from Georges Rey:
Now, it doesn’t seem to me even a remotely serious possibility that such a God exists: his non-existence is, in the words of the American jury system, “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I am, of course, well aware that plenty of arguments and appeals to experience have been produced to the contrary, but they seem to me obviously fallacious, and would be readily seen to be so were it not for the social protections religious claims regularly enjoy.
It doesn’t seem even a remotely serious possibility that such a God exists. That’s not a demonstration that it doesn’t, but it’s a very compelling reason not to believe that it does. And this is no small thing. It rests on the idea that one should have good reasons to believe things (where possible, other things being equal, etc). It has traction.
-
Steiner schools were founded by a racist mystic
The powerful people running Waldorf-Steiner schools today claim that these views do not influence the education that happens there, but…
-
Glenn Beck targets Frances Fox Piven
At one time it was all just talk for Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh and Dr. George Tiller’s assassin, Scott Roeder, too.
-
The lunatic Right v the Constitution
The Constitution was not written to weaken an overreaching Congress but to strengthen an enfeebled one.
-
Andrew Anthony talks to Pascal Bruckner
Like Voltaire and Diderot, Bruckner writes across a variety of forms and genres, as a philosopher, a polemicist, an essayist and a novelist.
-
Nabokov was right about the Polyommatus blues
Gene-sequencing technology has confirmed his speculation that they originated in Asia, moved over the Bering Strait, and moved south to Chile.
