All entries by this author

Orac on the Hauser Case *

May 19th, 2009 | Filed by

It will take time for CPS to find them. Meanwhile, his tumors are growing.… Read the rest



Warrant Issued for Mother of Daniel Hauser *

May 19th, 2009 | Filed by

The father testified that he doesn’t know the whereabouts of his son and his wife.… Read the rest



Daniel Hauser Fails to Appear at Court Hearing *

May 19th, 2009 | Filed by

District Judge John Rodenberg has issued an arrest warrant for Hauser’s mother; the two are missing.… Read the rest



Ed Brandon Reviews Galileo Goes to Jail *

May 19th, 2009 | Filed by

The important issues on the borders of science and religion are matters of what supports X rather than Y.… Read the rest



How the Light Gets In, Hay, May 22-31 *

May 19th, 2009 | Filed by

Philosophy and music festival: Blackburn, Grayling, Malik, Neiman, Bauman, more.… Read the rest



Massimo Pigliucci on Fish on Epistemology *

May 19th, 2009 | Filed by

Fish seems to think that once one has refuted the naive logical positivist view, all knowledge has been shown to be a matter of faith.… Read the rest



Russell Blackford on Fish on God *

May 19th, 2009 | Filed by

While chains of inference cannot be justified all the way down to all comers, it does not follow that none are better than others. … Read the rest



Piscis ipse dixit

May 18th, 2009 5:12 pm | By

Stanley Fish is back.

Evidence, understood as something that can be pointed to, is never an independent feature of the world. Rather, evidence comes into view (or doesn’t) in the light of assumptions…that produce the field of inquiry in the context of which (and only in the context of which) something can appear as evidence.

Yes yes yes, but it doesn’t follow that any and all assumptions are reasonable and sane and that therefore any old evidence is good evidence as long as it ‘comes into view in the light of’ some assumptions.

Then there is a swerve into a new topic, the fact that some people who commented on his previous musings on God claim that religion is … Read the rest



Martin in the Margins on Fish on God *

May 18th, 2009 | Filed by

The anti-rational evasions of Eagleton and Fish discredit the very cause they claim to defend.… Read the rest



Brian Leiter Asks a Question *

May 18th, 2009 | Filed by

Does the NY Times not realize that Stanley Fish is philosophically incompetent?… Read the rest



The Administration Can’t ‘Just Keep Walking’ *

May 18th, 2009 | Filed by

A major cover-up of corruption took place at the Bush Pentagon just six days before Bush left office.… Read the rest



Russell Blackford on the Arrest of Peter Tatchell *

May 18th, 2009 | Filed by

Tatchell puts his body on the line for his causes, when that’s what it means to stand up to authority in the name of human rights.… Read the rest



Fish Offers More God Talk *

May 18th, 2009 | Filed by

‘The religions I know are about nothing but doubt and dissent.’… Read the rest



Shuttle in Silhouette During Solar Transit *

May 18th, 2009 | Filed by

That’s some snap.… Read the rest



Peter Tatchell Arrested at Gay March in Moscow *

May 18th, 2009 | Filed by

Mayor has called gays ‘Satanists’; authorities said the march was banned to prevent ‘moral degradation.’… Read the rest



The enemy of my enemy is my friend…or perhaps not

May 18th, 2009 11:15 am | By

Brandon does some passive-aggressive self-chastisement:

I at least try to follow principles of amiability on this weblog. I do not always succeed; in a recent argument with Ophelia Benson in the comments thread to this post, when her response seemed to me to be a set of equivocations and red herrings of a pernicious kind that should not be tolerated on such an important subject as people’s lives, I became impatient and lost my temper; whatever the reason, however, the lapse of amiability was simply inexcusable.

I would say it’s not really the lapse of amiability itself that is inexcusable; I think a certain amount of heat is to be expected in substantive disagreements, and can be harmlessly … Read the rest



Catholic priorities

May 17th, 2009 5:12 pm | By

The Guardian continues its commitment to publish commentary from excitingly reactionary clerics and fans of clerics with the vomitings-forth of George Neumayr. His comment is an exceptionally lazy and vulgar diatribe.

Notre Dame’s now-infamous president, Father John Jenkins, is very fond of politically correct patter…This year Jenkins has rolled out his broken wheelbarrow of inane PC clichés to justify honouring the most pro-abortion American president ever.

And so on; it’s all like that.

A brilliant commenter posted a list of bishops taken from a Dallas Morning News list of Catholic bishops who protected sexually abusing priests. There are 19 bishops on the list, out of 61 who signed a petition protesting Notre Dame’s invitation to Obama. She suggested a … Read the rest



Thought-crime

May 17th, 2009 4:34 pm | By

I’ve been wrangling for a couple of days with Brandon at Siris. He took exception to my post on Nussbaum and stereotypes, accusing me of resorting to stereotypes myself, especially in replying to a comment:

It is as if you actively doubted that a black man could be an honest, law-abiding citizen. “Why?” Nussbaum asks. “Isn’t this just the stereotype of the violent black man?” Then says Ophelia’s counterpart (I’m very sure Ophelia herself would never say this): “Why do stereotypes have to be the reason for it? Couldn’t some people think that honest, law-abiding citizenship is just more difficult for blacks for a lot of reasons…?

And more of the same unpleasant implication. I asked him some … Read the rest



Wendy Grossman on the Terrible Judgment *

May 17th, 2009 | Filed by

Libel law balks responsible reporting; the public is deprived of knowledge they need to make informed decisions.… Read the rest



‘Evidence’: Scientific Word or Legal One? *

May 17th, 2009 | Filed by

‘Bogus’ is a word with many appealing applications when commenting on business and politics.… Read the rest