All entries by this author

Gillian Gibbons Taken to Court *

Nov 29th, 2007 | Filed by

‘Miliband said he emphasised Britain’s respect of Islam.’ Grovel grovel.… Read the rest



Bunglawala Refused to Condemn Stoning *

Nov 28th, 2007 | Filed by

It had happened during the lifetime of the Prophet, he said, ‘so you are asking me to condemn my Prophet.’… Read the rest



Fundamentalist Christianity in the US Military *

Nov 28th, 2007 | Filed by

Many Dominionist soldiers want the US to invade Iran, thereby triggering the Rapture.… Read the rest



Who’s Afraid of ‘Soulless Scientism’? *

Nov 28th, 2007 | Filed by

We alone among the animals have the power to create a straw man and spend an entire evening knocking it down. … Read the rest



Jean Kazez on Ishiguro on Compliance *

Nov 28th, 2007 | Filed by

Why do his clones comply? Why do the women of Saudi Arabia?… Read the rest



Gillian Gibbons Now Charged With Insulting Religion *

Nov 28th, 2007 | Filed by

Teacher charged with insulting religion, inciting hatred and showing contempt for religious beliefs. … Read the rest



Dignitas

Nov 27th, 2007 3:22 pm | By

Okay, you tell me – what does the phrase ‘human dignity’ mean? I don’t mean look it up, I can do that and that’s not what I’m asking anyway; I mean what does it mean as far as you know? What, if anything, does it suggest to you if you hear it or read it? A commenter pretended to find it scary as well as funny that potentilla and I both consider it meaningless, so I’m curious.

Why do I consider it meaningless? I suppose largely because it doesn’t seem to refer to anything real. What human dignity? I don’t consider humans to have much dignity. We’re too mortal, too fleshy, too fragile, too clumsy, too weak, too dim to … Read the rest



Scientific Method: Evidence, not Faith *

Nov 27th, 2007 | Filed by

Paul Davies sets up a flimsy straw man and proceeds to flog it mercilessly. … Read the rest



The Teddy-bear: Readers’ Views *

Nov 27th, 2007 | Filed by

The children themselves should be punished for having chosen the name of our great Prophet for a lowly bear. … Read the rest



Translating Stoppard in Moscow *

Nov 27th, 2007 | Filed by

19th-century liberal ideas can sound dangerously modern on the Moscow stage of today.… Read the rest



Teddy-bear Crime All a Misunderstanding *

Nov 27th, 2007 | Filed by

There was no apparent intention to offend Islamic sensibilities, Bunglawala said.… Read the rest



Golden Compass Trilogy is Atheist *

Nov 27th, 2007 | Filed by

No it’s not, it’s liberal theist. Which is worse?… Read the rest



“Skepticism” and Ignorance

Nov 27th, 2007 | By George M. Felis

Imagine you found a pretty crystal while on a hike at a park. Suppose that a few hundred meters further on the hike, you ran into another hiker and struck up conversation. In that conversation, you show them your pretty crystal: “Hey, look at this neat-o quartz I found!”

Suppose your new hiker acquaintance responds by saying, “Actually, that’s not quartz at all, it’s feldspar. When I’m not a nature hiker, I’m a geology professor and a licensed gemologist.”

Naturally, your reaction (assuming you are not yourself a geologist or something) would be to say, “I don’t think so. I still say it’s a quartz. It looks all… quartz-y!”

What? That wouldn’t be your reaction?

No, of course not. Such … Read the rest



Miscellany

Nov 26th, 2007 4:24 pm | By

Jesus and Mo discuss the ‘personally offensive’ issue. I would love to think Bill Buckingham will see that – but perhaps if he did he wouldn’t realize that it was about people like him.

Richard Chappell also discusses it.

It’s so depressing how arbitrary subjective responses are presented in public discourse as though they were legitimate reasons…The underlying problem, I suspect, is that our public culture has become so infected with subjectivist assumptions that people don’t realize that there’s a difference between desires and reasons. Sentiments are taken as given; no-one ever stops to question whether their reactive attitudes are warranted. Any kind of negative emotion is not just evidence, but constitutive, of suffering injustice. You’re

Read the rest


‘Gulabi Gang’ Tackles Sexism in Uttar Pradesh *

Nov 26th, 2007 | Filed by

Locals unsurprised at a women’s vigilante group in this landscape of poverty, discrimination and chauvinism. … Read the rest



Saudis Think Adultery Charge Justifies Lashes *

Nov 26th, 2007 | Filed by

Saudi justice officials claim rape victim has ‘confessed’ to affair. So what?… Read the rest



Sudan: Teacher Arrested in Teddy-bear Fuss *

Nov 26th, 2007 | Filed by

She let the children vote to name teddy-bear ‘Muhammad.’ Could get 40 lashes, 6 months; or worse.… Read the rest



The Taslima Nasreen Opportunity for India *

Nov 26th, 2007 | Filed by

When India banned The Satanic Verses, it breathed life into the demon of competitive intolerance.… Read the rest



Jesus and Mo on the Etiquette of Flouncing *

Nov 26th, 2007 | Filed by

When facts are offensive, reality should show more sensitivity.… Read the rest



Look out! It’s scientism!

Nov 25th, 2007 12:47 pm | By

The Manhattan Institute, a conservative ‘think tank’ in the US, declares its mission on each page:

The Mission of the Manhattan Institute is to develop and disseminate new ideas that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Oh yeah? Then what’s the latest piece of obscurantist theistic sciencephobic mystification from Leon Kass doing there? The ideas are so not new that they’re more like a putrefying corpse, they’re about closing down greater economic choice rather than fostering it, and they’re about irresponsible irrational scaremongering rather than about individual responsibility. Fucking typical of most US conservatives of the respectable stripe: they talk resounding bullshit but they line up obediently behind ‘ideas’ that ought to be anathema to them; in short, they’re … Read the rest