All young people should learn about scientific reasoning up to the age of nineteen.
Author: Ophelia Benson
-
Human Tissue Controls Rejected
Plans to limit the use of tissues taken from living patients have been defeated in the UK House of Lords.
-
Tobacco and Academic Medicine
Philip Morris exploited institional fears of losing research funding in order to preserve financial ties to academic medicine.
-
UN Debate on Cloning Draws to a Close
Two different resolutions are on the table.
-
Reeve in Stem Cell Advert
An appeal from beyond the grave.
-
Dark Ages Return in Pennsylvania
Intelligent Design on the science curriculum.
-
Derrida and Psychoanalysis
Derrida put the text on the couch.
-
‘Theory’ Began to Seem Banal
‘Theory’ was seen as a political weapon. Why? No one knows. [link fixed]
-
Derrida-ing Then not Derrida-ing
‘Theory’ as shibboleth.
-
Nannying is Not Such a Bad Thing
Julian Baggini on freedom, Britney and papal infallibility.
-
Ah, There it Is
Further travel news.
-
Joys and Sorrows of Independent Scholarship
Irregular income if any, inaccessible libraries; but it’s worth it.
-
Progress
More travel news.
-
That Dream Again
I just wanted to call your attention to this post on Normblog. It’s his reaction to yet another of those helpful lectures on how impoverished and pathetic secularism is and how we have to give up and admit that we ‘need’ religion. Of course, as always, the writer makes the case by 1) pretending that religion is the only possible source of things like meaning and solidarity, and 2) by redefining religion. Okay. At that rate – if there’s enough taking away combined with enough redefinition – I could be brought to agree with that idea too. But what of it? Of what use is it to assume that secularism is something it isn’t and that religion isn’t what most people take it to be? Of what use is an argument that depends on a bunch of fictions?
Enabling dreams of Paradise, a world where swords will be beaten into ploughshares, a counter-reality which glimpses an alternative republic of heaven on earth, where peace is built on justice rather than conquest… this, not virgin births, second comings, holy wars and infallible books, is the real stuff: hard-core religion in action. And we have a basic need for that, even if we know the need can never be wholly satisfied, the itch never healed.
No it isn’t. That is not the real stuff of religion. Religion has no monopoly on dreams of peace and justice, and plenty of religion has nothing whatever to do with peace and justice. I do wish if people are going to try to make a case for religion they could manage to do it honestly.
-
The Scottish Enlightenment
Conservative and radical at the same time.
-
Hannah Arendt Was Not Entirely Wrong
Not even as wrong as this article claims.
-
Real Life
Travel news.
-
Anti-Semitism at Frankfurt Book Fair?
Holocaust denial in Frankfurt? Uh oh.
-
More on Derrida
Reading familiar works against the grain.
-
The Modernity of Muslim Fundamentalism
The French are better at political anatomy.
