Christopher Hitchens and Katha Pollitt argue about The Nation, Iraq, Viagra, Norman Mailer, pacifism, guilt by association, whither the left, and more.… Read the rest
All entries by this author
Greatest Happiness v. Winners and Losers
Nov 29th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Alan Ryan explains John Rawls’ insight into the flaw in Utilitarianism.… Read the rest
GM Foods Could Be Good For You
Nov 29th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Are unthinking objections to genetically modified food indicative of a world view which is at odds with the rational, open and questioning values of science?… Read the rest
Universities and Egalitarianism
Nov 28th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Arnold and Huxley, Leavis and Snow, dustmen and doctors, prostitution and debt, tuition or taxation, all part of the argument.… Read the rest
Impostor Syndrome and Banal Jokes
Nov 28th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Susan Greenfield discusses women in science.… Read the rest
Oh So That’s What Truth Is!
Nov 27th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
“We will defend it because it is truth, and you can’t deny truth.” Thus spake the Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court of his monument to the Ten Commandments.… Read the rest
Where is the Outrage?
Nov 27th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Salman Rushdie ponders all the new ‘Rushdies’ that are springing up around the world.… Read the rest
The Group
Nov 26th, 2002 6:02 pm | By Ophelia BensonMalcolm Gladwell, in whimsical vein, writes in The New Yorker about the non-obvious connection between comedy-writing teams and groups that stimulate and encourage the creation of philosophy, psychoanalysis, art, ideas. He takes off from a book about the people who created the American tv show ‘Saturday Night Live,’ and then brings in Jenny Uglow’s The Lunar Men, about the group of thinkers and inventors around Erasmus Darwin and Joseph Priestley in late 18th century Birmingham. Gladwell points out that one feature of group dynamics is that friends can encourage and provoke each other to take more extreme positions than they would on their own, and that this is generally considered a bad thing. “But at times this quality turns … Read the rest
‘Philosophical laughing’
Nov 26th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Groups can encourage people to take extreme positions, whence innovation is born.… Read the rest
Nussbaum on Rawls
Nov 26th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Martha Nussbaum on John Rawls’ much-needed correction of Utilitarian-economist versions of morality.… Read the rest
‘Tell that to the Buddha’
Nov 25th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
David Lodge’s book on consciousness and fiction is too accomodating to cultural relativists who say the self is a peculiar Western invention, but interesting anyway.… Read the rest
Popular History and its Enemies
Nov 24th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Is the problem that the work is over-simplified, or that it’s commercially succesful? Orlando Figes is not the first to wonder.… Read the rest
Another Disputed Tenure Decision
Nov 24th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
As so often in these cases, opinions differ on whether there are legitimate reasons or only political ones for a denial of tenure.… Read the rest
Death Sentence for Heresy
Nov 24th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
A historian reports on the death sentence for a colleague in Iran who dared to call for an end to blind obedience from the laity.… Read the rest
Deference and its Discontents
Nov 23rd, 2002 3:00 pm | By Ophelia BensonThere are many tributaries that flow into the river of hostility to science, and some of them are ideas and thoughts that, used well, have much to recommend them. Used badly, they are another matter. Good ideas misapplied can turn silly in a heartbeat.
There is for instance the matter of deference. There is a bumper sticker/T shirt slogan in the US: ‘Question Authority’. Of course it’s obvious if you think about it for one second that that idea can cut both ways. To get it right the slogan would have to use qualifying language that would ruin it as a slogan. ‘Question authority but also bear in mind that authority may well know more than you do and knowing … Read the rest
Grammar for Language Teachers
Nov 23rd, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
It is difficult to teach a language without learning it first.… Read the rest
Advertisers Influence Drug Research
Nov 23rd, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Ad agencies own companies that ghostwrite articles for medical journals.… Read the rest
What of Step-dogs and Step-sofas?
Nov 22nd, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Simon Blackburn says Steven Pinker omits too much middle ground in The Blank Slate.… Read the rest
Free speech at Harvard
Nov 21st, 2002 7:59 pm | By Ophelia BensonTwo stories about Harvard in the Boston Globe in the last two days raise a lot of interesting if intractable questions. The first tells of a plan for a Law School committee “to draft a speech code that would ban harassing, offensive language from the classroom.” It is interesting that “another professor’s comment that feminism, Marxism, and black studies have ‘contributed nothing’ to tort law” is included by the reporter in a list of “racial incidents.” Is that comment, that opinion, really a racial incident? By what definition? But perhaps even more unnerving is the name of the new group: the Committee on Healthy Diversity. Oh dear. What sanely skeptical adult does not want to pack a bag and light … Read the rest
Speech Code for Harvard Law
Nov 21st, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Is it diversity or is it self-serving special pleading, Dershowitz asks.… Read the rest