All entries by this author

David Aaronovitch on the Two Erics *

Nov 6th, 2003 | Filed by

Orwell knew and Hobsbawm knows how to face facts.… Read the rest



Boys in School *

Nov 6th, 2003 | Filed by

Noise and bravado unhelpful, so have them study in professional football clubs. Eh?… Read the rest



Hobsbawm on History for a Broad Public *

Nov 6th, 2003 | Filed by

It can be good and readable without talking down to the readers.… Read the rest



Bogus Egalitarianism in Action *

Nov 6th, 2003 | Filed by

The ludicrously rich eat hot dogs, therefore inequality is just fine.… Read the rest



And Another

Nov 5th, 2003 6:25 pm | By

Want more? Want more bad writing combined with bad thinking? Right then.

This is from a review by Azfar Hussain of Dis/locating Cultures/Identitites, Traditions, and Third World Feminism by Uma Narayan.

Narayan’s preoccupations with the problematics of the representations of sati in Western feminist discourse indeed remain intimately connected to other representationalist discursive areas, namely dowry-murders in India and domestic violence-murders in the United States — issues that she takes up in the third chapter of her book. Narayan takes a hard, critical look at the ways in which dowry-murders in India are framed, focused, and even formulated in US academic feminist discourse, while pointing up the dangerous problems kept alive by Western culturalist epistemological approaches to Third-World subjects, identities,

Read the rest


So It’s a Sample You Want?

Nov 5th, 2003 5:03 pm | By

A reader of ours seems to think I haven’t actually read any bad writing. He’s wrong about that. He tells me to quote some that’s recently published. Very well. Mind you, I wouldn’t do it just to please him, but I’ve been meaning to anyway, when I got around to it, so I’ll get around to it now.

This is from a book published this very year, 2003. It is called, elegantly, The Futures of American Studies, and is edited by Donald E. Pease and Robyn Wiegman. Here is a sample – highly representative, I assure you – from the Introduction:

Like most founding gestures, this one gave monumental status to an origin retrospectively invoked, thereby giving the past

Read the rest


Neglecting One’s Social Duty *

Nov 5th, 2003 | Filed by

When was child-bearing made compulsory?… Read the rest



Richard Wollheim *

Nov 5th, 2003 | Filed by

The Guardian obituary.… Read the rest



Poverty and Superstition *

Nov 5th, 2003 | Filed by

David Stanway looks at the idiocy of rural life in China.… Read the rest



Free Speech, Offense, Harm? *

Nov 5th, 2003 | Filed by

What do we mean by: safety, comfort, offense, hatred, inappropriate, healthy campus climate?… Read the rest



Compulsory Parenthood *

Nov 5th, 2003 | Filed by

‘…this does nothing but denigrate women by reducing them to their biological function.’… Read the rest



Human Remains Working Group Set to Report *

Nov 5th, 2003 | Filed by

Australian Aborigines welcome plan to set up bones repatriation panel.… Read the rest



The Routledge Companion to Postmodernism *

Nov 5th, 2003 | Filed by

Being playful and ironic and in fashion has its limitations.… Read the rest



Group Think

Nov 4th, 2003 9:42 pm | By

The Ruddick essay I discussed in the last N&C was published, as I mentioned, in November 2001, but it was revived and discussed again on several blogs last July. This comment or brief essay by Timothy Burke is particularly interesting.

It’s noticeable what a lot of words there are in both pieces that have to do with social pressure, conformity and group-think. From Ruddick’s article: accusations; how inhibiting these tensions can become; the necessity of adhering to the critical norms of the moment; dominant thinking; rules that I thought were very limiting; disgrace; I was still afraid I’d be attacked; this fear of attack can be utterly compelling; a caution bordering on ventriloquism; disciplinary taboos on certain words and ideals; … Read the rest



Department of Jumping to Conclusions *

Nov 4th, 2003 | Filed by

White guys at university binge-drink because they’re so ashamed of not being diverse, right?… Read the rest



Is it Protest or Trespass? *

Nov 4th, 2003 | Filed by

‘I was protecting the environment’ is not a defence, high court rules.… Read the rest



‘Philosophers Have Beards’ – Really? All of Them? *

Nov 3rd, 2003 | Filed by

TV could be an excellent medium for popularizing philosophy, but if it always has to be visually entrancing, well…… Read the rest



Dictionary of Life Has Two Billion Entries *

Nov 3rd, 2003 | Filed by

The first letter is G, the two billionth is T.… Read the rest



Royals are Cross at Their Runaway Slave *

Nov 2nd, 2003 | Filed by

What it’s like to work for people who can’t fasten their own seat belts or recognize servants as human.… Read the rest



Adam Swift Defends Diane Abbott *

Nov 2nd, 2003 | Filed by

How political principles and personal choices fit together matters.… Read the rest