The suspense continues.
The Good Law Project have written an 82 paragraph letter to the BSB, the authors of which is not revealed. They seem curiously invested in this. Apparently to refer to Mr XX’s inverted penis as a ‘wound’ is sufficiently morally culpable to mean I have no article 10 protection.…
— Sarah Phillimore (@SVPhillimore) August 28, 2025
… Read the restApparently to refer to Mr XX’s inverted penis as a ‘wound’ is sufficiently morally culpable to mean I have no article 10 protection.
I repeat: inverting your penis to line a surgically created cavity is not a ‘vagina’. It is a wound that will require persistent dilation so it does not close up. This is a fact. It is not harassment
