All entries by this author

Bullying with a girlish lisp

Apr 18th, 2025 5:28 pm | By

Look at this horrible grizzling whining man doing his affected woman-imitation while threatening women and promising to abuse them.

“I, as a trans woman, will always use female spaces no matter what,” he says, underlining that he will terrorize women because he can and he likes it. The “no matter what”=no matter how desperately women object. It’s the Bully’s Creed – “I will always do exactly what I want no matter how much you object.”

https://twitter.com/TheParty1sOver/status/1913271764672462922… Read the rest


Vibe shift

Apr 18th, 2025 11:12 am | By

Heather Cox Richardson yesterday:

There seems to be a change in the air.

Three days ago, on April 14, Michelle Goldberg of the New York Times wrote that the vibe is shifting against the right. Yesterday, former neocon and now fervent Trump critic and editor of The Bulwark Bill Kristol posted a photo of plainclothes Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Officers kidnapping Tufts University graduate student Rümeysa Öztürk, and commented: “Where does the ‘Abolish ICE’ movement go to get its apology.”

Today, in the New York Times, conservative David Brooks called for all those resisting what he called “a multifront assault to make the earth a playground for ruthless men” to work together. He called for a “comprehensive national

Read the rest


Wait WHO is escalating tensions?

Apr 18th, 2025 10:34 am | By

Trump’s war on the law continues.

After attacking judges and repeatedly sidestepping their orders, the Trump administration has accused a federal judge in Washington of escalating tensions between the judicial and executive branches by seeking to hold the White House accountable for its courtroom behavior.

Because he thinks he’s a monarch and the law is subservient to him. He’s the prez but he doesn’t understand the separation of powers.

The accusation against the judge, James E. Boasberg, came in a court filing early Friday morning by the Justice Department. In it, department lawyers asked the federal appeals court that sits over Judge Boasberg to prevent him from opening an expansive contempt inquiry into whether the White House violated an

Read the rest


A shining example

Apr 18th, 2025 9:56 am | By
A shining example

This guy is such a gift. He will force himself on women and if cops show up to stop him he will scream “rape” at them.

And of course Willoughby says “Yeah!”

Read the rest


Blokes fuming

Apr 18th, 2025 8:28 am | By

Brendan O’Neill is frankly gloating.

No sooner had the Supreme Court said what even the Neanderthals knew – that men are men and women are women – than these blokes were fuming. First out of the traps was thin-lipped loon India Willoughby. He branded the court’s decision ‘evil’. Yes, it is apparently wicked and immoral to say that if you have a todger you’re a fella. Willoughby spent the day furiously doubling down on his delusions of womanhood. ‘I have always been a woman’, he said. Tell that to the jizz you sired your kid with.

It’s a ‘grim day’, they cry. The ruling threatens trans people’s ‘safety’, they say. That’s big talk from a

Read the rest


Write down his birth sex this time

Apr 18th, 2025 8:04 am | By

It begins.

Rapists will no longer be able to identify as women following a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court.

Forces are now expected to begin recording criminals’ birth sex rather than preferred gender in official crime statistics following the ruling, which stated that trans women are not the same as biological women under equality laws.

It will end a situation where some police forces record rapists as being women, even though the legal definition of the crime requires a penis.

Finally the police will have to stop forcing rape victims to call their rapists “she/her.”… Read the rest



Not you

Apr 18th, 2025 7:53 am | By

How ugly. University and College Union spits on women.

https://twitter.com/DrJoGrady/status/1912921188193480755… Read the rest


A closer look

Apr 18th, 2025 5:13 am | By

Medscape explains how clueless and reckless Bad Kennedy is.

In an interview earlier this year, RFK appeared on Fox Nation to talk about a range of issues, but he spent much of the time discussing infectious diseases and the measles outbreak in particular. We took a closer look at the secretary’s comments quoted in his own words and fact-checked them with some leading infectious disease specialists.

RFK: “The safest application of vitamin A is through cod liver oil because you’re getting it through food and the toxicity issue is no longer an issue. You can test people at the hospital for vitamin A.…There’s a lot of good studies out there to show that even as a prophylaxis it’s effective in

Read the rest


Know thy limits

Apr 17th, 2025 6:06 pm | By

It never seems to occur to Kennedy that he doesn’t know as much about it as the professionals do. Why is that? The rest of us don’t prance around thinking we know all about electrical engineering and dark matter and how to fly planes, we understand that there are professionals and experts who have taken the time to learn a subject or skill and we can’t be professionals and experts without doing the same thing.

He thinks he knows better why rates of autism have risen. Why does he think that?

In remarks laced with scientific inaccuracies, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, said on Wednesday that autism was preventable while

Read the rest


Oh the level of vitriol is it

Apr 17th, 2025 5:02 pm | By

Honest to christ do these people pay any attention at all??

DUDE. Pay fucking attention. Look at how “the trans community” has been treating us – women – for the past ten or more years. We’re not the bullies here. Furthermore, trans people aren’t the poor unfortunate neglected bedraggled starved tortured victims here, either. Trans people have been sanctified while women have been kicked to the

Read the rest


First do no harm

Apr 17th, 2025 11:15 am | By
First do no harm

Ah yes, that’s the way to get around environmental laws and restrictions: define harm very narrowly.

The Trump administration is proposing to significantly limit the Endangered Species Act’s power to preserve crucial habitats by changing the definition of one word: harm.

On Wednesday, the administration proposed a rule change that would essentially prohibit only actions that directly hurt or kill actual animals, not the habitats they rely on. If finalized, the change could make it easier to log, mine and build on lands that endangered species need to thrive.

And the species would disappear. They would all be gone, you see, so nobody would be harmed.

Under the Endangered Species Act, it’s illegal to “take” an endangered species. By

Read the rest


From the margin

Apr 17th, 2025 10:24 am | By
From the margin

Willoughby is busy demonstrating what a healthy, fair-minded, generous ideology Trans Dogma really is.

Remember when he objected with the same energy to trans women in the police body-searching women? No, neither do I.… Read the rest



And the very next day

Apr 17th, 2025 8:33 am | By

Oh dear, trans ideology chalks up another loss, how sad, never mind.

A trans woman who complained to police about social media posts made by a “gender critical” man has lost a High Court challenge of the force’s decision to take no further action against him.

Lynsay Watson complained to Greater Manchester Police (GMP) in February 2023, about more than 15 posts made on X by Stuart Campbell related to the murder of teenager Brianna Ghey, who was also transgender, that month.

Mr Campbell, who was described by his lawyers as “gender critical” or a “biological realist”, said Brianna was a “trans-identifying boy”, adding: “Human beings can’t change sex. Being murdered doesn’t alter that.”

Imagine complaining to the police … Read the rest



Judges at the highest level

Apr 17th, 2025 8:11 am | By

Kathleen Stock credits For Women Scotland:

Thanks to the tenacity of grassroots organisation For Women Scotland in fighting several cases through the courts, judges at the highest level have now clarified that a man — with or without a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) — does not belong in any woman-only prison, hospital ward, dormitory, rape crisis service, or changing room. If trans-identified, he is rightly shielded from discrimination and harassment under the protected characteristic of “gender reassignment” but not those of “female” or “lesbian”. This classification also means that, if he’s a medical professional, he is not allowed to provide intimate care to unwilling women on the spurious grounds that he, too, is female. As a police or prison

Read the rest


Bad reflecting

Apr 17th, 2025 7:54 am | By

Jolyon Maugham pretends trans ideology is like Freedom Summer. And what? India Willoughby is another James Chaney?

https://twitter.com/WingsScotland/status/1912828298255642805… Read the rest


Guest post: Misogyny is not “fringe”

Apr 17th, 2025 6:27 am | By

Originally a comment by Bjarte Foshaug on Return of pearls and handbags.

I’m a man myself, and if I were a woman, I wouldn’t feel safe around men either. If the election of the pussygrabber, the rise of the manosphere, the sheer magnitude of the inherently misogynistic porn industry etc. should have taught us any lessons, it’s that male predatory attitudes, as well as general hate and contempt towards women, are not ”fringe”.

One of the mixed “blessings” of growing up male is that – unless you’re going to spend your life in a sealed box – you can hardly avoid being exposed to vast amounts of misogynistic “locker-room” talk from other “boy-men” who seem to take for granted … Read the rest



“Oh but I was always on team correct”

Apr 16th, 2025 3:30 pm | By

Aaaaand the retrofitting begins.

Just one bit of added context…

Read the rest



Sweeping consequences

Apr 16th, 2025 10:14 am | By

CNN nervously reports:

The United Kingdom’s highest court ruled that the legal definition of “woman” excludes trans women, in a case with sweeping consequences for how equality laws are applied.

Britain’s Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the definition of a woman in equality legislation refers to “a biological woman and biological sex,” sparking celebrations outside court among gender-critical campaigners but warnings it was a “worrying” development for transgender people.

The case centered on whether trans women with a gender recognition certificate (GRC) – which offers legal recognition of someone’s female sex – are protected from discrimination as a woman under the nation’s Equality Act 2010.

It still, after all this time, seems absurd that we have to argue … Read the rest



Return of pearls and handbags

Apr 16th, 2025 7:12 am | By

Helen Webberley is astounding.

https://twitter.com/HelenWebberley/status/1912400262527918471

And if that’s not enough –

Sure because 100% of men are 100% safe around very young girls. Obviously. … Read the rest



Modest return of reality

Apr 16th, 2025 6:18 am | By

Official.

Read the rest