Collection of articles on on the ways Hindutva propagandists distort ancient Indian history.
Category: Flashback
Fashionable nonsense has been with us since the time that prehistoric man first transcribed Of Grammatology on to the walls of the Lascaux caves. Here we cast an eye back at some historical highlights.
-
Carl Sagan on The Burden of Skepticism
What is called for is an exquisite balance between skeptical scrutiny and great openness to new ideas.
-
Jeffrey Nielsen’s response to firing by BYU
I also strongly disagree with the implications of your statement that faithfulness and loyalty to the church and church leaders never permits expressions of disagreement, or questioning of our church leaders – especially in an academic setting.
-
Mary Lefkowitz on Distortions of History
He has his view and you have yours and they have theirs. So it goes.
-
Paul Boghossian on the Sokal Hoax.
‘To concede that no one ever believes something solely because it’s true is not to deny that anything is objectively true.’
-
Lee Smith on Tariq Ramadan
‘Ramadan is a cold-blooded Islamist who believes that Islam is the cure for the malaise wrought by liberal values.’
-
Jihad versus McWorld
In the 1992 article that he expanded into an excellent book, Barber examines the ways Identity and Shopping are dividing the world between them.
-
Dwight Macdonald
‘…all but a fraction of his own writing molders unattended in America’s used bookstores. Like the New York Intellectuals with whom he was associated…he is referenced more often than read, a sad fate for a critic who wrote so much, so well and with such wit and insight.’
-
Professionalization in the Humanities
What if you want to talk about an authentic self instead of an ‘authentic self’?
-
Romila Thapar demolishes Sanskritic Indus Theory
‘Indian history from the perspective of the Hindutva ideology reintroduces ideas that have long been discarded and are of little relevance to an understanding of the past.’
-
Raymond Tallis on Sokal & Bricmont.
‘The protection built into Theory…is composed of layer on layer of ignorance.’
-
‘Why should science be any different?’
‘We no longer defer to bishops or politicians; scientists are simply facing the same fate.’ Yes but bishops are one thing and scientists are another. We can demand that scientists produce evidence, but what evidence can a bishop offer?
-
Research psychology or psychotherapy.
‘…many of the widely accepted claims promulgated by therapists are based on subjective clinical opinions and have been resoundingly disproved by empirical research conducted by psychological scientists.’
-
Susan Haack on Vulgar Rortyism
It’s important to distinguish between necessary, useful technicality, and jargon or pseudo-mathematics substituting for genuine rigor.
-
Democracy and its Global Roots
‘Developments take place in a world linked by ideas rather than by race.’
-
Melvin Konner takes on the opponents of sociobiology.
Biologists who had done no primary research in human sciences nevertheless issued anathemas on it.
-
Holocaust Denial on Trial
Deniers distort history in order to promote antisemitism and white supremacy.
-
Irfan Khawaja takes issue with Daniel Pipes
Militant Islam and militant Christian fundamentalism are indeed related.
