Here’s your precious “investigation”

It’s just so insulting.

https://twitter.com/NormEisen/status/1047869765556097024

https://twitter.com/AriBerman/status/1047887425589141504

https://twitter.com/tribelaw/status/1047888995131305984

Comments

11 responses to “Here’s your precious “investigation””

  1. Your Name's not Bruce? Avatar
    Your Name’s not Bruce?

    Welcome to the ongoing reality series American Coup.

    I always thought that “reality” TV shows were supposed to be unscripted. This one is anything but that. It’s following a play book.

  2. disillusioned Avatar
    disillusioned

    “The American people won’t stand for it.”

    Yes, they will.

  3. Acolyte of Sagan Avatar
    Acolyte of Sagan

    I cannot help but wonder what the current SCOTUS judges are thinking as they see their court being reduced to just another department subordinate to the wishes of Trump and the GOP, not to mention likely being forced to take such a snivelling, lying, abusive shitweasel into their once-respected office.

  4. Athena Andreadis Avatar

    I know I’m mixing my metaphors, but the FBI “report” (if only) is the fig leaf the Rethuglicans will use to do their emperor’s new clothes crass, callous, bad-faith playacting.

  5. Omar Avatar

    The limited FBI investigation was triggered after Dr Christine Blasey Ford testified at a Senate hearing last week, detailing her allegation that Kavanaugh attempted to rape her when the pair were teenagers in high school. Two other women have accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault and misconduct. Kavanaugh denies the allegations.

    On Thursday, the Senate judiciary committee chair, Chuck Grassley, said the FBI report “found no hint of misconduct” but Democrats criticised the investigation, implying that it was narrow in scope to protect Donald Trump’s supreme court nominee.

    I dare say that the next time Chuck Grassley loses his car keys, he will confine his investigation to places selected on a similar basis, like to a whole heap of sites he has never been to, with or without them.

    Trouble with a whitewash job is that it always finishes up with blotches in it. It’s very hard to find a reliable brand of whitewash these days.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-10-05/senate-panel-gets-fbi-report-on-kavanaugh-misconduct-accusations/10340030

  6. Screechy Monkey Avatar
    Screechy Monkey

    Susan Collins is saying it’s thorough.

    Which is… not a good sign. Hard to believe that she would give up one of the reasons for justifying a no vote unless she was planning to vote yes. My guess is that McConnell knows he’s got the votes but has told Collins, Flake, and Murkowski to hold any announcement so as to maximize pressure on the red state Democrats. That’s a win-win for them: either one or more Dems vote yes, which allows them to claim “bipartisan” support, or the GOP can use the no votes in the campaign.

  7. Kevin Henderson Avatar
    Kevin Henderson

    Every time I think of BK I think of Thor: ‘it can’t be you…you’re just the worst.”

  8. iknklast Avatar

    Screechy, and if any Dems vote yes, that will also serve as fuel to keep the Democrats home, citing the ones that voted yes as a reason not to bother to vote.

  9. John the Drunkard Avatar
    John the Drunkard

    Who do they think they are fooling?

    Do they need to fool anyone? From Clarence Thomas to today, with the Clinton-hunt and ‘Swiftboat Veterans’ along the way.

    ‘Deplorables.’ ‘Vast right-wing conspiracy.’ NO hyperbole there.

  10. Screechy Monkey Avatar
    Screechy Monkey

    iknklast,

    Yeah, and that’s unfortunate. I find Dems like Joe Manchin frustrating, too, but realistically, that’s about the best you can expect from West Virginia. The occasional — or even frequent — shitty votes are just the price you have to pay. The most important vote any senator ever makes is for majority leader. Switch out any two Republican senators for Joe Manchin clones, and (1) Dianne Feinstein would have been chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and could have postponed the hearings and committee vote pending a full FBI investigation, not this one-week quarter-assed job, and after that could have ensured a real substantive process, not allowing Kavanaugh to filibuster or the Republicans to hide behind their “female prosecutor”; and (2) Chuck Schumer would be Majority Leader, and could refuse to hold a vote at all just like McConnell did to Merrick Garland. The three Joe Manchins in my scenario wouldn’t matter unless they were willing to switch parties over it.

    On the other hand, wobbly centrist Dems in solid blue states ought to be primaried aggressively. Something Republicans figured out long ago.

  11. iknklast Avatar

    Screechy – don’t forget, it was a Red State Dem who put restrictions on abortion funding into the ACA – Ben Nelson, of my state, Nebraska. Then he retired, and left the state to go back to deep red again with no polka dots of blue.