Hyperbolic propaganda in journal form
Talk about institutional capture…
“Sex wars and (trans) gender panics” by Sally Hines.
“Whose feminism is it anyway? The unspoken racism of the trans inclusion debate” – I bet we can guess which side of the “debate” is riddled with unspoken racism.
“Feminism will be trans-inclusive or it will not be: Why do two cis-hetero woman educators support trans feminism?”
“Autogynephilia: A scientific review, feminist analysis, and alternative ’embodiment fantasies’ model” – by Julia Serano.
“A critical commentary on ‘rapid onset gender dysphoria'”
And more.
Excuse me, I gotta read “TERF wars: An introduction,” which is open access.
Yes, there’s a massive debate going on. Here to talk about it are fourteen people from one side of the debate.
I seem to recall that evolutionary biology journals which addressed “Intelligent Design” would regularly include an article or two written by advocates. If nothing else, it kept the rebuttals honest. It wasn’t just a matter of fairness or avoiding straw-manning. If you don’t understand the other side, then you don’t understand your own.
So the failure to allow the Enemy to explain their side of the argument means it’s not an argument. It’s not a rational position. As the journal admits, it’s a War.