Centers for Disease Passive Observation

Can we have public health regulations or no?

The Biden administration on Wednesday appealed a federal court ruling striking down the mask requirement for passengers on planes, trains, buses and other public transportation after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention concluded that the mandate was “necessary for the public health.”

That judge thinks bus drivers and flight attendants and the people who need to use buses and trains and planes should just take their chances, for the sake of our Divine Freedom. That judge who is very young and inexperienced and a Trump appointee.

While the C.D.C. wants to keep the mandate intact, it is also pressing the appeal to preserve its public health powers. But doing so is potentially risky. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, which will hear the case, has a conservative bent, and the case could end up before the Supreme Court. If the ruling striking down the mandate is upheld, that decision could permanently weaken the agency’s authority.

How are we defining “conservative” here though? It seems like a very odd notion of conservatism to think people should be free to spread disease, or that rules are inherently bad things. It’s not so much conservative as bonkers-AynRandian, or Purely Selfish Libertarianism.

“This sets up a clash between public health and a conservative judiciary, and what’s riding on it is the future ability of our nation’s public health agencies to protect the American public,” said Lawrence O. Gostin, an expert in public health law at Georgetown University. “The risk is that you will get a conservative 11th Circuit ruling that will so curtail C.D.C.’s powers to fight Covid and future pandemics that it will make all Americans less safe and secure.”

There again, what’s “conservative” about that? Trumpian, yes, but conservative, no. This nonsense is tribalism rather than any recognizable right v left issue.

The C.D.C. actually has very limited regulatory authority; by and large, the power to impose public health restrictions lies with state and local governments. But legal experts agree that interstate transportation is a notable exception. In interviews, several said Judge Mizelle badly misread the law.

When it passed the Public Health Service Act of 1944, Congress authorized the C.D.C. to “make and enforce such regulations as in its judgment are necessity to prevent the introduction, transmission or spread of communicable disease.”

The law also suggests some steps the C.D.C. could take to prevent the spread of disease, including sanitation, disinfection and pest extermination.Judge Mizelle construed those suggestions as the C.D.C.’s only options — a narrow interpretation that “fundamentally misunderstands the scope of authority allowed to C.D.C.,” said James Hodge, the director of the Center for Public Health Law and Policy at Arizona State University. She also erred in likening the mask mandate to a quarantine, he said.

Oh ffs – really? That’s childish. Pretending a “for example” is a complete list is a rules-lawyering kid’s trick. “You said I couldn’t have any more cookies, you didn’t say cake!!”

The judge also faulted the C.D.C. for failing to solicit public comment on the mask order — a finding that Professor Gostin said “defies common sense.” While administrative law requires public comment for most federal actions, it also allows for exceptions for “good cause.”

No it’s fine. Next time the National Weather Service issues a hurricane warning they should solicit public comment before anyone takes it seriously. That’s always worked well in the past.

11 Responses to “Centers for Disease Passive Observation”