Women must not be allowed to protest. It’s ungodly.
Comments
3 responses to “Silencing the Karens”
Papito
At this point, it seems appropriate to call those thugs “pro-rape activists.”
Your Name’s not Bruce?
Silencing the Karens
Silence means consent, right? It’s all okey-dokey if nobody complains. YOU, OVER THERE! STOP COMPLAINING!!
Not only are women not allowed to object to men in women’s prisons, they must not be seen to be objecting to men in women’s prisons. They are not allowed to point out that the thing we’ve been told doesn’t happen is in fact happening. There’s so much that is indefensible in the trans “rights” movement, but the forced incarceration of women with men has to be among the worst, and least publicized manifestations. The women subjected to this have no choice. If women get what they deserve, then women in prison must deserve it even more. Right? If women’s rights are not worth protecting, then the rights of imprisoned women are even less worthy of respect. Right? One really needs to look into what one thinks the “right side of history” is when you support and engage in actions which violate the Geneva Conventions.
Comments
3 responses to “Silencing the Karens”
At this point, it seems appropriate to call those thugs “pro-rape activists.”
Silence means consent, right? It’s all okey-dokey if nobody complains. YOU, OVER THERE! STOP COMPLAINING!!
Not only are women not allowed to object to men in women’s prisons, they must not be seen to be objecting to men in women’s prisons. They are not allowed to point out that the thing we’ve been told doesn’t happen is in fact happening. There’s so much that is indefensible in the trans “rights” movement, but the forced incarceration of women with men has to be among the worst, and least publicized manifestations. The women subjected to this have no choice. If women get what they deserve, then women in prison must deserve it even more. Right? If women’s rights are not worth protecting, then the rights of imprisoned women are even less worthy of respect. Right? One really needs to look into what one thinks the “right side of history” is when you support and engage in actions which violate the Geneva Conventions.
https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v2_rul_rule119
Very good point.