Monitoring the rebellious women 24/7.
What?! How dare she! How dare she talk back to a man that way!
Well when he says “your constituents” immediately followed by “we” he of course doesn’t mean he is one of her constituents, he means [ explanation goes here ].
Comments
14 responses to “We want to know”
It technically doesn’t materially imply that he is of her constituency, just as “You kiss your [spouse] with that mouth?” doesn’t materially imply that the speaker is the other’s spouse.
However, materially is doing some rather heavy lifting there. And, of course, that sort of ambiguity is favored by the concern troll and cry bully, as it gives them an easy out.
Or to put it another way, implying is exactly what it does. (I don’t know what “materially imply” means. I’m missing a lot of your meanings today.)
*looks it up*
Ok, kind of beside the point in an ordinary (albeit abusive) social media conversation.
Heh, yeah, everyday usage of “imply” is basically synonymous with “suggest”. I’m just being pedantic. The sentence doesn’t imply that he’s a constituent in the strict sense logicians mean by ‘imply’, where every time the sentence is uttered, the speaker is a constituent of the addressed.
We now return you to your regularly scheduled a blog comments section.
Men. Is this how you talk to men.
A question? I see accusations and assertions, no questions at all.
Oh really? Pray tell, enlighten us, and provide evidence of any kind.
I see Aidan Comerford has hidden his account, or whatever that action is called.
I hope he hides it in the center of the earth.
It’s nice how some people out themselves as arrogant jackasses by simply putting their pronouns in their bio’s, it makes them easy to spot. Show me one bio with pronouns who isn’t an arrogant jackass and I’ll recant.
Colin Wight (@colwight) Tweeted:
The ministry for lunches is about to confirm that all women wishing to have lunch in groups need to get prior approval. All enquires about said lunches need to be approved by Aidan Comerford (@aidanCtweets). Please get your requests in early as he’s going to be busy. https://twitter.com/colwight/status/1513985830125436928?s=20&t=uGH05q0fnZaDLBtC2psMJQ
Human F(re)emale (@HumanFreemale) Tweeted:
@colwight @vrarda1 @AidanCTweets I can’t get his permission, he has blocked me. What on Earth will I do? https://twitter.com/HumanFreemale/status/1514365508455383040?s=20&t=uGH05q0fnZaDLBtC2psMJQ
Colin Wight (@colwight) Tweeted:
@HumanFreemale @vrarda1 @AidanCTweets Eat alone for the rest of your life? It’s tough, but we can’t have women lunching in groups without permission. It’d be the end of civilisation. https://twitter.com/colwight/status/1514366005380018177?s=20&t=uGH05q0fnZaDLBtC2psMJQ
Constituent or not, someone this dishonest and libelous should feel lucky to get off so lightly. Comerford and Sherman can both fuck off, along with the pantomime horse they rode in on. JUST ONCE, I’d love to see one of these bullies forced to testify as to the actual hate and transphobia in the writings of JKR or any other feminist who’s been hounded for defending women’s rights. I’d pay good money to watch these slimeballs squirm under cross.
@9 An exceptional tweet if I ever saw one. :D
Comerford is so smug.
You don’t know any such why. There is no “hate group.” Some women having lunch is not a “hate group.”
No, it’s not a “simple question.” It’s a “gotcha,” it’s a clown question. Women aren’t playing your game.
Yes. The goal of women who reject genderism is to preserve women’s rights, including the right to maintain sex-segregated spaces without men. Besides that, you (everyone) don’t know anything else that women who reject genderism want.
Yeah, no kidding. DARVO extraordinaire.