Hundreds of hours of a woman talking
“Freda” Wallace complains that there are hundreds of hours of video of Kathleen Stock talking.
“I’ve watched endless hours of Kathleen Stock on YouTube talking to other academics, there’s no shortage of Kathleen Stock talking.”
So classic. So male. A woman talking! Can you imagine?!
“There are hundreds of hours of Kathleen Stock talking, she doesn’t need -“
At that point the presenter interrupted.
Who knew there was a limit or quota? Is it smaller for women than it is for men? It is, isn’t it. And bigger for trans women? Is that why he’s so cross and disdainful?
Why did he watch endless hours of Kathleen Stock talking? Was it for a bet? Did he hope to catch her out saying something “transphobic”? If I can’t stand someone, I find it difficult to watch them for one minute. There are certain voices that trigger me to the off switch.
Same – Donald Trump and Tucker Carlson to name two.
Funny story.
Back in the day, I could not stand to hear George W. Bush talking. The sound of his voice made my skin crawl.
Then I stumbled across the Party Party tapes. Party Party was some guy who took clips of Bush talking and sliced and diced them to make him say things he hadn’t said, as parody. And set the whole thing to music. And I enjoyed listening to them.
So I realized that the problem I had with Bush wasn’t the sound of his voice per se. It was knowing that everything he said was a lie.
A couple of asides first…
“There’s no shortage of Kathleen Stock talking, there are endless hours of Kathleen Stock talking. She doesn’t need…”
The same can be said of every TRA youtube channel I’ve ever seen, yet I have a feeling they will object to being told they can be barred from public speaking gigs on that basis.
“Nobody has ever lost a job for having a certain view, what they’ve lost jobs for as bullying in the workplace.”
Just blatant lies.
___
The main thing that got my attention however was “You’ve got to understand that the balance of power is not in the trans people’s favour-”
This argument seems self-refuting to me. If it is found to be compelling and Stock is drummed out of this public address on the strength of it, by overturning her will in this matter, the TRAs demonstrate that they in fact have the upper hand in deciding if she gets to speak publicly. And just like that, the premise of the argument is disproven by the argument’s success.
KB @1 Agree. I doubt this person has even listened to a few minutes. I also doubt this person has the mental capacity to understand Professor Stock’s position at all. The trans cult has labelled her the enemy, and that’s all they need to know. Same with JKR, et al. The superficiality runs deep with these people, which is quite oxymoronic, but there it is.
twiiter, maybe it’s time for a new concept: deep superficiality.