Former President Donald Trump’s promised press conference to refute the allegations in the indictment handed up by the Fulton County DA’s Office is now very much in doubt, multiple sources familiar with the matter tell ABC News.
He wants to blather about the indictment in a press conference? Is there any limit to his stupidity?
Sources tell ABC News that Trump’s legal advisors have told him that holding such a press conference with dubious claims of voter fraud will only complicate his legal problems and some of his attorneys have advised him to cancel it.
Trump announced the planned press conference with a social media post shortly after he and 18 co-defendants were indicted late Monday in Georgia. He said he would present, “A Large, Complex, Detailed but Irrefutable REPORT on the Presidential Election Fraud which took place in Georgia.”
Georgia’s Republican governor responded to that with his own social media post declaring, “The 2020 election in Georgia was not stolen. For nearly three years now, anyone with evidence of fraud has failed to come forward – under oath – and prove anything in a court of law.”
Yes but he won’t be under oath so he’s free to tell any lies he wants and he’s stupid enough to do it. In public.
Comments
8 responses to “Large but irrefutable”
Is there any limit to his stupidity?
No
Hope this helps.
Snerk. Thanks.
Oh to be a fly on that wall. Telling Donny NO! Horror beyond imagining!
It’s really just too much stupid for one human. Perhaps his stupidity is not so much limitless as pan-dimensional. I hypothesize that he is drawing upon stupidity from parallel universes, alternate timelines, and the past and future of our own current reality. Unfortunately, this does not render those dimensions and realities any less stupid. Stupid expands to fill the space available. Trump’s siphoning off of stupidity just makes room for more.
“Stupid expands to fill the space available”
aka the Ideal Gasbag Law.
There are far more repulsive aspects to his character, like his swaggering contempt for people. By contrast his utter stupidity is almost one of his good qualities.
Yes, if we’re doomed to have criminals, I’ll take stupid ones who get caught to clever ones who don’t.
Well yes if he were stupid but benevolent and well-meaning that would be different, but all the same, I do want intelligence in people who hold high office. It’s useful.
But the man’s stupidity seems to have served him rather well until the present.