The real issue is whether Harris will be permitted high-heels. I’m sure that Trump can agree with the TRA crowd that they are a major part of the definition of womanhood and not at all “artificial”. I mean, it’s right there in the Bible right after the lyrics to schmaltzy songs and the extra commandments (thou shalt commit adultery along as it’s with a porn star, thou shalt grab pussy if you’re famous enough, etc).
Hmm, so just quoting from the chorus of a well-known song is enough to get classified as spam? Or perhaps it was the brevity that triggered it. I suppose the parenthetical remark was enough to convince the spam detector that I was a real person trying to say something.
Comments
6 responses to “What about artificial hairdos?”
The real issue is whether Harris will be permitted high-heels. I’m sure that Trump can agree with the TRA crowd that they are a major part of the definition of womanhood and not at all “artificial”. I mean, it’s right there in the Bible right after the lyrics to schmaltzy songs and the extra commandments (thou shalt commit adultery along as it’s with a porn star, thou shalt grab pussy if you’re famous enough, etc).
I said you ain’t so big, you know you’re just tall / that’s all
(Sorry if this got posted multiple times. I tried twice, but nothing happened, so here is my third attempt, this time using a different browser.)
“I didn’t know they stacked shit that high.” — Gunnery Sergeant Hartman.
Sorry Harald! The first two went to spam, so I unspammed them. That should fix the browser problem but let me know if it doesn’t.
Hmm, so just quoting from the chorus of a well-known song is enough to get classified as spam? Or perhaps it was the brevity that triggered it. I suppose the parenthetical remark was enough to convince the spam detector that I was a real person trying to say something.
The ways of spam detectors are a closed book to me.