You hate women who know that men are not women, and who proclaim and act upon this truth. Neither stating this fact, nor acting in accordance with it is hateful. Yet your own statements and actions evince a deep animosity to those women resisting male incursions into female spaces. You call them TERFs, and post images showing signs calling for their lynching.* Did you admonish the signbearer for this incitement to murder? If not, why not? It certainly looks very much like “hate” to me, though I’d be curious to hear your explanation of why you think it’s not. Does that mean you know you’re going to lose? You could save everyone a lot of time and anguish by acknowledging this immediately, and ending your continued persecution of these brave women. Thanks.
*Clearly genderists are not content to let their opponents die of old age, with their supposedly outdated, bigoted beliefs expiring with them, but are eager to hasten the process at the end of a gibbet. It makes an interesting contrast with the touching plea to “LET US LIVE” held up in another of your posted photos. Nobody is trying to kill trans people; given that death-to-TERFs sign (and many others like it that have been proudly, brazenly paraded over the years), that shoe is on the other foot. Women just want to keep men out of their spaces. Despite what you believe, they’re allowed to do that, and doing that is not going to kill anyone. In fact it will be of great benefit to the health, safety, and dignity of women and girls. Why are you against that? Women are not human shields for men who claim to be women. They are not simply props or tools for the ‘affirmation” and “validation” of these men’s delusions. If they feel threatened by other men, they need to take it up with the men, or work to build their own facilities. Women’s are already occupied; your attempts to hand them over to men is hateful and dangerous.
Did you admonish the signbearer for this incitement to murder? If not, why not? It certainly looks very much like “hate” to me, though I’d be curious to hear your explanation of why you think it’s not. Does that mean you know you’re going to lose? You could save everyone a lot of time and anguish by acknowledging this immediately, and ending your continued persecution of these brave women. Thanks.
I am not a lawyer, but to my mind that is arguably the ‘assault’ part of ‘assault and battery.’ Its creators and carriers could have copped a fine, finished up doing a stretch inside as the guest of His Majesty, or both.
I’m confused.
You hate women who know that men are not women, and who proclaim and act upon this truth. Neither stating this fact, nor acting in accordance with it is hateful. Yet your own statements and actions evince a deep animosity to those women resisting male incursions into female spaces. You call them TERFs, and post images showing signs calling for their lynching.* Did you admonish the signbearer for this incitement to murder? If not, why not? It certainly looks very much like “hate” to me, though I’d be curious to hear your explanation of why you think it’s not. Does that mean you know you’re going to lose? You could save everyone a lot of time and anguish by acknowledging this immediately, and ending your continued persecution of these brave women. Thanks.
*Clearly genderists are not content to let their opponents die of old age, with their supposedly outdated, bigoted beliefs expiring with them, but are eager to hasten the process at the end of a gibbet. It makes an interesting contrast with the touching plea to “LET US LIVE” held up in another of your posted photos. Nobody is trying to kill trans people; given that death-to-TERFs sign (and many others like it that have been proudly, brazenly paraded over the years), that shoe is on the other foot. Women just want to keep men out of their spaces. Despite what you believe, they’re allowed to do that, and doing that is not going to kill anyone. In fact it will be of great benefit to the health, safety, and dignity of women and girls. Why are you against that? Women are not human shields for men who claim to be women. They are not simply props or tools for the ‘affirmation” and “validation” of these men’s delusions. If they feel threatened by other men, they need to take it up with the men, or work to build their own facilities. Women’s are already occupied; your attempts to hand them over to men is hateful and dangerous.
YNnB:
I am not a lawyer, but to my mind that is arguably the ‘assault’ part of ‘assault and battery.’ Its creators and carriers could have copped a fine, finished up doing a stretch inside as the guest of His Majesty, or both.
[miscellany room 12 is kaput!]
I’m seriously considering rejoining the UCU so that I can leave again.
“Bring back witch-burning” says a placard carried by a pro-TRA protester in the UK.
https://x.com/treesey/status/1913721684110016913
Awful.
Thank you; # 13 is now open for business.
And, of course, the sign is held by a man with a beard.
Yeah, but it’s “punching up”, so it doesn’t really count as hate…
…determined by the infallible method of “Proof by Sound Volume”, of course.