Charm offensive

Well, sir, yes, but also no. Mostly no. Of course there are women in all colors shapes and sizes [well not all, but a variety], but funnily enough there’s more to women than color, shape, and size. Quite a lot more. Maybe you don’t understand that on account of not being a woman?

As for what the fuck do we know, what (may I ask) the fuck do you know? You seem to think being a woman is all about the visuals. You also seem to have a lot of contempt for women, along with some strong dislike. You also, as I mentioned above, seem to think women are about what they look like and nothing else.

No of course we don’t all have to look the same, but to be women we do have to be the same in certain respects. And no, “some of us [women]” do not have penises. It’s definitional. Rabbits are not as tall as giraffes, and women do not have penises. Here endeth the lesson, without telling you to go fuck yourself.

Comments

5 responses to “Charm offensive”

  1. Mike B Avatar

    Balding ones . . .

  2. twiliter Avatar

    “And you women…”

    Not ‘us’ women, mind you.

    Nasty little man.

  3. maddog1129 Avatar

    Women are not “gatekeepers of womanhood.” (Neither is anyone else.)

    We can’t exclude people who are women, and we can’t include people who aren’t women. The genderspeak “principle” of “inclusivity” is barking up the wrong tree altogether. There’s nothing volitional or decisional about the determination of whether or not someone is a woman. Oh, and women don’t have penises. You’ve made a fundamental category error there, fella.

  4. Colin Day Avatar

    Is “offensive” an adjective or a noun?

  5. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    It’s both! Also a cough medicine.

    maddog, I like “nothing volitional or decisional” – must steal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *