More solemn discussion of the massively complicated and nuanced and sensitive fact that men are not women.
The president of the US’s top administrator of collegiate sports on Sunday said his organization does not anticipate adjusting its rules on transgender athletes after a recent federal supreme court decision allowed states to ban them from participating in school athletics.
In an interview with CBS News’ Face the Nation, Charlie Baker, the NCAA president, alluded to how his organization in late January 2025 had effectively banned transgender athletes from women’s sports by closing off those programs to athletes who were assigned male at birth or were taking testosterone therapy. There are no restrictions for participation in NCAA men’s sports, which Baker referred to on Sunday as “the open network”.
Gosh, really? Now why might that be? Does anyone know? Could it possibly be because women playing in men’s sports do not have an advantage but rather its opposite, a disadvantage?
The Guardian, of course, doesn’t bother to say. The Guardian pretends it’s just one of life’s funny little anomalies.
The supreme court majority’s ruling essentially said that banning trans women and girls from competing in female sports does not run afoul of Title IX, a civil rights law prohibiting discrimination in education.
It overturned prior judgments issued by lower courts in relation to two trans students – one in college and the other in high school – who had sued after being barred from competing in West Virginia and Idaho.
Look how carefully the Guardian avoids saying why it’s males who are banned from women’s sports and not females who are banned from men’s sports. Look how carefully the Guardian avoids even admitting that the two “trans students” in question are not females. The Guardian goes to great lengths to conceal the truth of what they’re reporting on.
The supreme court majority’s ruling essentially said that banning trans women and girls from competing in female sports does not run afoul of Title IX, a civil rights law prohibiting discrimination in education.
It overturned prior judgments issued by lower courts in relation to two trans students – one in college and the other in high school – who had sued after being barred from competing in West Virginia and Idaho.
Oops! It stumbles and admits the truth for a few seconds with “banning trans women and girls from competing in female sports” but then it hastens to pull the curtain again with “two trans students”.
The reporting here carefully and with malice does everything it can to hide the fact that males have large physical advantages over females and that is why they should not force their way into women’s sports. It’s all framed as women who object are Trump fans and the poor banished trans gurls are their shattered abused victims. It’s vomitous.
Leave a Reply