Heretics not allowed

So now we’re throwing people out of public places because we don’t like what we think they think?

Is that legal?

I think it might not be.

Amy Sousa tells us:

So we went to the Sports Bra in Portland so we could watch the Thorns game and after buying food and drinks we were told we needed to leave because another customer complained about our shirts.

We had not interacted with anyone but our own group.

Do press the play button to witness the very polite and intelligent explanation they get from the staffer. Her explanation would also have applied to the Woolworths Four back in the day.

Comments

4 responses to “Heretics not allowed”

  1. Freemage Avatar

    Sorry, Ophelia, there’s no law on your side, here*–a bar is not ‘a public space’ like a park or city sidewalk. Rather, it’s still considered a private space that is open to the public. The only rules regarding such spaces are that you cannot discriminate based on protected attributes, like race and sex. Political opinions do not fall into that category.

    *: One of those protected categories, for the record, is religion. If one could first make an argument that trans ideology is a religious belief based on the notion of gendered souls, then that would open up the bar to essentially denying service on religious grounds–since the bar’s purpose is not advancing trans ideology specifically, that would make it the equivalent of denying service for wearing a Darwin Fish t-shirt because you don’t like atheists.

  2. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    Fortunately I was sly enough to say I think it might not be [italics not in original]. I also got roundly schooled for being less cautious about it on Facebook.

  3. Holms Avatar

    The cowardice of the complainer/s is what bugs me most. Nobody liked the tattle-tale in school, no one likes the one community-living resident that takes notes on who has how many visitors… but the gender politics movement has been right up their alley.

  4. iknklast Avatar

    While political opinion is not a protected characteristic, I believe it should be. If we want freedom of speech, we have to have freedom of speech. Unfortunately, most people only protest restrictions of speech when it is speech they don’t like. By not protecting political speech in the same way that other speech is protected, we run the risk of monocultures, of living in bubbles, and of never hearing the other side. In fact, that’s what’s getting us into all this trouble now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *