Outrage: women means women

Euan Weddell outraged that things reserved for women are reserved for women.

Sadly Unison has caved in to transphobes.This from there bulletin for the upcoming National Women's Members Conference.Found here cf-store.eu-west-1.widencdn.net/unisondam/2/…

— Sophie Molly (@sophiemolly.co.uk) 2026-09-04T23:35:08.668Z

Members are advised that eligibility for seats reserved for women is determined by what sex you are: it has to be the female one. Duh.

Also, while we’re on the subject, when it’s a union for journalists basic literacy is a plus. Not saying “there bulletin” when you mean “their bulletin” would be a good, if horrifyingly basic, step.

Comments

8 responses to “Outrage: women means women”

  1. iknklast Avatar

    Using ‘there’ for ‘their’ is becoming horrifyingly common. It was one of the most frequent mistakes I marked in student papers. Doesn’t anyone learn about synonyms anymore?

  2. Jim Baerg Avatar

    You need that to use the ‘argumentum ad homonym’ ;)

  3. Ian Hargreaves Avatar
    Ian Hargreaves

    iknklast: there and their aren’t synonyms. That’s rather the point.

    Doesn’t anyone learn about homophones any more? Its probably because of woke.

  4. Colin Day Avatar

    You’d think the writer would be better with pronouns.

  5. Athel Cornish-Bowden Avatar
    Athel Cornish-Bowden

    Yes. Using the wrong pronoun is the worst thing you can do nowadays. You’d think that a man like Euan Waddell would know that.

  6. iknklast Avatar

    iknklast: there and their aren’t synonyms. That’s rather the point.

    Yeah, big oops. I do actually know the difference. ;-) Just not giving it enough thought before my fingers hit the keys!

  7. Acolyte of Sagan Avatar
    Acolyte of Sagan

    “‘Biological sex’ means sex at birth.” No shit, Sherlock.

    ‘Biologically female’ just makes me want to slap someone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *