The emergence of a different paradigm

The NY Times published a guest essay yesterday titled We Study Mass Shooters. Something Terrifying Is Happening Online.

Until recently, if asked to profile a typical mass shooter, we would have described a middle-aged man who was socially isolated and in despair. He was not in the grip of a political ideology, nor did he have a mental health condition such as schizophrenia. Rather, he was deeply despondent about a life crisis, perhaps a divorce or a job loss. In attacking a workplace or a group of people he blamed for his problems, he was both exacting vengeance and effectively or literally committing suicide.

Over the past several years, something has changed. We are witnessing the emergence of a different paradigm: a mass shooter no less despairing about life’s hardships but younger, highly connected to online social networks and seemingly convinced that in acting violently he or she is carrying out the only meaningful act possible in a world otherwise devoid of meaning. This shift is highly significant for our understanding of the online-fueled pathologies that afflict our society and for the policies that could help prevent such tragedies.

Consider a recent example. Last month in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia, an 18-year-old killed her mother and half brother at home, then opened fire at a secondary school she had attended, killing five students and an educator. In the aftermath of the shooting, amid the expected evidence of the shooter’s despair, there emerged an alarming trail of online activity: On Roblox, a game platform, the shooter had created a game simulating a mass shooting; her TikTok account reportedly featured reposted videos of a mass shooter; she belonged to a gore forum where users can post uncensored videos of violence, which has been frequented by other mass killers; and she had visited the online profile of a 15-year-old girl who killed two people at the Abundant Life Christian School in Madison, Wis., in 2024.

But. There’s a catch. You know what it is, of course. That “she” is not a she. The guest essay starts with a major, repeated lie about the very subject the authors are writing about. They tell us We Study Mass Shooters but what’s the point if they then systematically lie about the sex of at least one of their subjects?

I looked for more information and found that Wikipedia does the same thing.

On February 10, 2026, a mass shooting occurred in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia, Canada. Jesse Van Rootselaar killed her mother and half-brother at their home before going to Tumbler Ridge Secondary School, where she killed six people and injured twenty-seven others before killing herself. Van Rootselaar was a former student of the school.

No footnote, no brackets, no warning, no explanation – just the big lie.

My signpost to this outrage was, as so often, Helen Lewis.

Comments

12 responses to “The emergence of a different paradigm”

  1. Kevin Henderson Avatar
    Kevin Henderson

    The Wikipedia article is frustrating to read. I even asked an editor if ‘he’ could be used since it was a male and the editor refused stating policy that cited discrimination. Holy god, I think there is some serious readjustment of what discrimination means anymore.

  2. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    I mean, way to make Wikipedia useless! It’s maddening.

  3. Mike B Avatar

    The spectrum of human belief, from right to left, is finally and completely debauched.

  4. Your Name's not Bruce? Avatar
    Your Name’s not Bruce?

    But. There’s a catch. You know what it is, of course. That “she” is not a she. The guest essay starts with a major, repeated lie about the very subject the authors are writing about. They tell us We Study Mass Shooters but what’s the point if they then systematically lie about the sex of at least one of their subjects?

    And what does it say about the “trans community” or “gender identity” when having a male, mass shooter described as “she” is seen as VALIDATION and defended as such? When using “incorrect” pronouns becomes a worse crime than murder. “How DARE you ‘misgender’ that mass killer! SHES ONE OF US!”

    How sick is that? “She might be a murderous criminal, but she’s our murderous criminal!”

  5. J.A. Avatar

    When it comes to murder, telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth is required. Seems quaint I know but I’m a stickler for the truth myself.

  6. What a Maroon Avatar
    What a Maroon

    I looked at the comments to see if anyone called them out. Didn’t find any, and the comments are now closed. Otherwise I would’ve pointed out that these are all examples of male-pattern violence.

    Seems quaint I know but I’m a stickler for the truth myself.

    I believe someone once wrote a book titled Why Truth Matters. Seems to be out of print, but I recently found a used copy online; it’s on my reading list.

  7. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    You spotted my very oblique reference to that little book.

  8. iknklast Avatar

    WaM, I read it, and I highly recommend it. Unfortunately, my copy was lost when my movers decided to leave random stuff behind in Maine. It does have some good company, though: I lost something like 3000 books!

  9. Bjarte Foshaug Avatar
    Bjarte Foshaug

    Just remember: No true scotsman trans woman is a threat. Any trans-identified male who commits a crime is not really trans but only pretends to be. It’s just that no one would ever claim to be trans unless they are. After all, that would imply that self-identificationn weren’t infallible afterall, and we all know that can’t be true!

  10. What a Maroon Avatar
    What a Maroon

    iknklast,

    3000 books? Dang! I thought we had a lot.

  11. iknklast Avatar

    Yeah, WaM, I have spent a lot of time in used bookstores, and buying from remainder’s catalogs. It was heartbreaking to lose so many. My copy of Does God Hate Women? is reposing somewhere, I’m sure, within the vicinity of Why Truth Matters. I have read both, but now I have had to mourn their passing.

  12. Holms Avatar

    The one thread common to virtually all mass shooters is that they are male, and the researchers of the subject went out of their way to bury it. Useless fools.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *