Theft

How dare he.

Jim Crow. Jonathan Willoughby is not, repeat not in any way comparable to the people who were victims of Jim Crow laws. (Crow. Not Crowe. Crow. Think about it.)

Jonathan Willoughby has freedom and rights. People subject to Jim Crow laws had neither. Jonathan Willoughby is in no way comparable to the people enslaved by Europeans in the US over many generations.

Comments

One response to “Theft”

  1. Papito Avatar

    It’s outrageous that single-sex spaces are segregated by sex? That’s what the words mean, it’s what they’ve always meant, and the highest court agrees that’s what they mean.

    Willy can sue whoever he wants, he won’t win. He’s not being singled out; he has the same right to be in a single-sex space as everybody else does. He just doesn’t have the right to be in the single-sex space set aside for the sex he is not.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *