In that case why mention feminism at all?

Written by

Ophelia Benson

in

Classic.

https://twitter.com/GMconservative/status/970724036559880192

I thought feminism was supposed to mean equality for all, if that’s the case why does “feminism” need to mentioned if equality was mentioned? Because clearly feminism is women’s advancement only.

Just classic. Feminism means equality for all, therefore, there’s no need to mention “feminism,” because the goal is equality for all, so that just makes this pesky scare-quoted “feminism” thing superfluous AND totally creepy because it’s women’s advancement only. WHY CAN’T WOMEN JUST FOCUS ON EVERYBODY GOD DAMN IT and by everybody I mean men, especially with men who wave the Murikan flag not once but TWICE.

Comments

5 responses to “In that case why mention feminism at all?”

  1. chigau Avatar
    chigau

    I think it might be the 50th anniversary of the first time I heard that argument.

  2. Steve Watson Avatar
    Steve Watson

    Hey, #AllLivesMatter, doncha know?

  3. Holms Avatar
    Holms

    “If you want sex equality, you should reject feminism for egalitarianism!!” <== an uninformed person.

  4. Rob Avatar
    Rob

    Thrice Ophelia, thrice! It’s the background to his photo as well. The one where he poses like Justin Timberlake or James Dean. What a shallow try hard twit.

  5. Jeff Engel Avatar
    Jeff Engel

    “Why mention oncology at all? It’s all about health, right? Because oncology is about advancing CANCER PATIENTS over anyone else!!”

More posts