Yeah, ‘cos nothing screams adorable like slugging a woman over the back of the head with a stick and calling her a bitch for speaking her mind.
Sackbut
“Trans people are valid” meaning what, again?
Holms
Violence against women is cool again, provided it is one of those pesky unpersons that believe women are female. Notably, violence against men that believe that is not in vogue.
iknklast
“Trans people are valid” meaning what, again?
They had their parking lot ticket punched so they could get free parking?
Seth
Validating oneself through lurid fantasies of committing violence against women. I think we have a name for people who do that kind of thing, but it escapes me at the moment.
Screechy Monkey
This would seem to be against Twitter’s terms of service, would it not?
But calling someone by a pronoun they don’t like is “literal violence” and clearly violates Twitter’s ToS. While posting “cute” meme images of rape threats and beating women with flagpoles, barbed wire baseball bats, and other blunt instruments is just …
Nope. Not going to continue. Because it’s not fucking funny.
Holms
Yeah, it’s a depiction of violence against a specific, non-fictional person. That’s a glaring hole in Twitter’s protections if it is allowed.
Skeletor
I don’t see how this is still online. Twitter has some messed-up priorities.
Comments
12 responses to “Just like the old boss”
Yeah, ‘cos nothing screams adorable like slugging a woman over the back of the head with a stick and calling her a bitch for speaking her mind.
“Trans people are valid” meaning what, again?
Violence against women is cool again, provided it is one of those pesky unpersons that believe women are female. Notably, violence against men that believe that is not in vogue.
They had their parking lot ticket punched so they could get free parking?
Validating oneself through lurid fantasies of committing violence against women. I think we have a name for people who do that kind of thing, but it escapes me at the moment.
This would seem to be against Twitter’s terms of service, would it not?
You’d think.
But calling someone by a pronoun they don’t like is “literal violence” and clearly violates Twitter’s ToS. While posting “cute” meme images of rape threats and beating women with flagpoles, barbed wire baseball bats, and other blunt instruments is just …
Nope. Not going to continue. Because it’s not fucking funny.
Yeah, it’s a depiction of violence against a specific, non-fictional person. That’s a glaring hole in Twitter’s protections if it is allowed.
I don’t see how this is still online. Twitter has some messed-up priorities.
I like this response:
https://mobile.twitter.com/Heather_Uhhhhh/status/1287914230923046914
Sackbut: see this
https://www.jesusandmo.net/comic/valid/
Heh. I think I shared that one here, didn’t I?