He/him for now

Ah good it’s helpful to have this cleared up by an expert.

https://twitter.com/KatyMontgomerie/status/1509127933750882305

So he gets to use all the toilets, right?

More from the expert:

https://twitter.com/KatyMontgomerie/status/1509185039178899458

Men who claim to be women must be allowed into all spaces set aside for women on pain of being called unambiguously transphobic by this Montgomerie dude.

Comments

16 responses to “He/him for now”

  1. Beth Clarkson Avatar
    Beth Clarkson

    How would it be harmful to cis women and girls?

  2. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    I think Katy means because men like him would assault them in revenge.

  3. What a Maroon Avatar
    What a Maroon

    How would it be harmful to cis women and girls?

    BECAUSE I SAY SO, OK?

    It’s obvious. And unambiguous. So there.

  4. Bruce Coppola Avatar
    Bruce Coppola

    How would it be harmful to cis women and girls?

    “Nice little single sex space you got here. Shame if something was to happen to it.”

  5. Athel Cornish-Bowden Avatar
    Athel Cornish-Bowden

    This Montgomerie dude needs to work on his head tilt.

  6. Beth Clarkson Avatar
    Beth Clarkson

    Thanks for the responses. I hadn’t realized it was actually a threat.

  7. Your Name's not Bruce? Avatar
    Your Name’s not Bruce?

    Maybe he’s standing up for butch lesbians who aren’t as good as him at “womaning?”

  8. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    It’s an implied threat, a hinted threat, a deniable threat…bullying and cowardice in one package. Very Katy Montgomerie.

  9. ibbica Avatar

    “Totally immoral to provide spaces that exclude both men and us TIMs because we TIMs are no threat to women. Oh and we TIMs will endanger women if you don’t do what we tell you to.”

    Tell me someone’s asked Katy to clarify explicitly whether they’re an imbecile or a bully?

  10. Holms Avatar

    From my experience with arguments over on FTB, I believe the ‘harm to cis women and girls’ belief is actually in reference to their belief that keeping toilets etc. single sex will require genital inspections for anyone that wants to use the womens’ rooms.

  11. iknklast Avatar

    keeping toilets etc. single sex will require genital inspections for anyone that wants to use the womens’ rooms.

    I’m sure that comes from their belief that no one can tell the difference between men and women. We don’t inspect genitals now, and we never have. Yes, sometimes a woman might be seen to be in the wrong restroom, but that is usually relatively easily clarified.

    It is also the delusion that these men “pass”.

  12. Nullius in Verba Avatar
    Nullius in Verba

    … It’s obviously and unambiguously misogynistic to call [ed: what awkward phrasing] to force women and girls to accept men in spaces set apart for the safety and dignity of women and girls; i.e., single-sex spaces.

    And no, you don’t get to then assert, “but trans women are women”. That’s the conclusion of a different argument, not an axiom. Until that argument is accepted as sound and valid, you don’t get to use its conclusion as a premise anywhere.

  13. Sastra Avatar

    Beth Clarkson asked

    How would it be harmful to cis women and girls?

    Based on what I’ve encountered on the internet, in addition to the genital inspections TRAs are very, very concerned about females who don’t look “feminine enough” being insulted, challenged, and thrown out of Women’s restrooms by women policing the place for transwomen. There are a bunch of articles written by female trans allies detailing the abuse they suffered because some other woman thought they were transgender. These articles are usually accompanied by a photo of an obvious female with short hair, t shirt, and jeans. See? Transphobes can’t tell sex. The only way to protect mannish cis-woman is to make it illegal to throw anyone out.

    These stories are also used as evidence that Gender Critical feminists want (or are fine with) women going back to long hair, dresses, makeup, and high heels so they don’t get mistaken for transwomen. This makes little to no sense, since many transwomen wear those things and that makes it a poor “disguise” but apparently gender conformity is part of our Secret Master Plan.

  14. GW Avatar

    And no, you don’t get to then assert, “but trans women are women”. That’s the conclusion of a different argument, not an axiom. Until that argument is accepted as sound and valid, you don’t get to use its conclusion as a premise anywhere.

    That’s what these activists don’t seem to understand!!! Argh.

  15. iknklast Avatar

    Sastra, the other thing about those stories: no evidence. If they present a video they shot, sure. If they have witnesses (preferably unbiased witnesses), sure. But…

    I am aware that there are certain pre-packaged stories Christians use to show how Christianity “saved their life”. I was actually thumbing through one of their books in our library lately. It was as amusing as it was horrifying. I suspect there is a similar thing going on with trans-allies. Of course, it could also be that they perceived something as being mistreated when it wasn’t any such thing. The young woman in the gynecologist’s office is a good example. Were people really staring at her? I doubt it, since she looked very much like a woman with short hair, and not a they/them enbee special snowflake. And it is my experience that people do not look at each other in the doctor’s office; they stare at their book, their phone, or their shoes.

    I am unaware of a long history of throwing women out of bathrooms for not looking feminine enough. There have probably been some cases of women mistaking very masculine looking women for men, but overall, having short hair does not make other women think you are a man.

  16. Blood Knight in Sour Armor Avatar
    Blood Knight in Sour Armor

    Take Tilda Swinton… she’s iconically androgynous but the only kind of man you’ll ever confuse her with is say, David Bowie, so…