Never mind. It’s just some angry witchy screechy bitchy women getting all frenzied in the uterus.
It’s just hysterics I tells ya. We all know how women are.
“Helen, you’re an angry witchy screechy bitchy hysterics-having slag yourself, which you would realise if you’d seen your own comments.”
Comments
5 responses to “Beware the hysterics”
“Blunt policy instrument” WARNING: REDEFINITION OF “WOMAN” AHEAD! Preparing us for the inevitable violations of boundaries. Thanks for that.
“Complicated:? Women’s sports are for women only. How much simpler than that can it get? Sometimes clarity can appear to be blunt, but that depends on whose perspective you’re taking. Let’s have a look from a different viewpoint shall we? What part of “sanctioning male intrusion and cheating in women’s sports” isn’t blunt?
“Fast moving”? Men are not women and can never be women. Things don’t get any slower than never. The only thing that’s moving with any speed are the hasty attempts to get men into women’s events, to nothing but the detriment of women.
Says the man ready to give away women’s rights while being the voice of reason. No more reason to read further, even if we pass over the use of “hysterics.” Clearly he has “inclusivity” to sell, and the ones who will pay the price will be women.
Trans athletes want to be “surrounded” by uterus havers, that’s their goal. This Lutton dude’s argument is the old “It’s OK for them to cheat because there are so few of them.” variety. Cheating in the margins is cheating, dumbass.
Yes. If the entire team was made up of TiMs, the “pioneer” would lose both his guaranteed winning edge, and his hit of affirmation being “one of the girls.” He would then have to go out and find another actual women’s team “of his own” to infiltrate and colonize.
“Helen, if you weren’t so emotional, you’d realise that word is completely fitting.”
The new misogyny: Just like the old misogyny but now with a coat of teflon wokeness.