No that’s a good thing. Especially on law issues. Err on the side of niggle picking.
Francis Boyle
Not. fuckin’. Enough*. But it’s a start. Let’s hope the next one will be an actual criminal conviction.
*About a billion would be right. I’m not sure this will even hurt him financially. But you never know with a liar.
iknklast
Francis Boyle @9:
Does that mean you think he’ll actually pay it?
Jim Baerg
So I read that article about the Doonesbury cartoon & how the Post yanked that 1973 strip. I was reminded of reading Pogo strips from before I was born & how newspapers sometimes wouldn’t print the parodies of the McCarthy hearings.
Francis Boyle
He won’t, but that doesn’t mean he can’t be destroyed financially.
Comments
12 responses to “GUILTY”
Good news. May it be the first of many guilty verdicts to come.
Huh?
Ah, checked the NY Times. So it’s Trump. I lost track of the number of lawsuits he’s facing.
Apparently, he called the verdict a disgrace. Ooh, that’s a surprise.
Wonder if there will be a panicked phone call to the Kremlin begging for money to pay the “billionaire’s” judgment?
Liable. Not “guilty.”
And defamation.
I doubt she’ll ever see the money, but it’s a good moment nevertheless.
And maddog, I suspect Ophelia was alluding to a classic Doonesbury cartoon.
https://readingdoonesbury.com/2017/10/25/this-week-in-doonesbury-guilty-guilty-guilty/
Kind of, but also just liking the sound of it better.
It does sound better.
It’s the lawyer in me that makes me niggle-pick.
No that’s a good thing. Especially on law issues. Err on the side of niggle picking.
Not. fuckin’. Enough*. But it’s a start. Let’s hope the next one will be an actual criminal conviction.
*About a billion would be right. I’m not sure this will even hurt him financially. But you never know with a liar.
Francis Boyle @9:
Does that mean you think he’ll actually pay it?
So I read that article about the Doonesbury cartoon & how the Post yanked that 1973 strip. I was reminded of reading Pogo strips from before I was born & how newspapers sometimes wouldn’t print the parodies of the McCarthy hearings.
He won’t, but that doesn’t mean he can’t be destroyed financially.