Et tu?

This isn’t the Guardian or the BBC, it’s the Times. Why does even the Times do this?

Trans doctor at heart of NHS gender row to work in Australia

The transgender doctor who was at the centre of a legal dispute in Britain over the use of women’s spaces has been given permission to work in Australia.

Beth Upton, 30, left NHS Fife after the A&E nurse Sandie Peggie took her to court over the latter’s suspension due to a heated exchange at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy in 2023.

Took HER to court – why do they do that?? The whole point is that he’s a he, so why does even the Times lie about it and confuse, trick, mislead readers? Why does even the Times obey the rules of this idiotic destructive women-hating ideology?

Upton has now been registered as an emergency medic by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency, which has allowed her to work under supervision at hospitals on the north coast of New South Wales.

She was registered on April 9, and her sex was listed as female. It was not immediately known whether she had started work. 

Yes, HIS sex was listed as female, which is a lie. Doctors shouldn’t be lying about their sex. The Times shouldn’t be helping doctors lie about their sex.

The decision has outraged some women’s rights advocates in Australia. Rachael Wong, the chief executive of Women’s Forum Australia, said it was “deeply alarming” that the regulation agency had registered Upton as female.

She added that Upton was “not only male; he is a male who has openly disregarded women’s boundaries, privacy and consent”.

Which is true, and a matter of public record, so why is the Times lying about what sex he is?

The regulation agency defines a female as someone whose “biological sex is that of a female” and whose gender identity or gender expression is that of a female.

That’s deranged. Idenniny and expression have nothing to do with it. Fantasize and play let’s pretend all you like, but not on the job, especially when that job is being a doctor. Who the hell wants a deranged lying giant bully of a man for a doctor?

Comments

3 responses to “Et tu?”

  1. Omar Avatar

    “The regulation agency defines a female as someone whose ‘biological sex is that of a female’ and whose gender identity or gender expression is that of a female.”

    Why would an anatomical female who is also a feminist quarrel with that?

    If it was, say: “The regulation agency defines a female as someone whose biological sex can be either male or female as long as their gender identity or gender expression is that of a female” it would be a different story.

    Or have I missed something?

  2. Deep Thinking Avatar
    Deep Thinking

    @Omar

    Like Ophelia said: gender identity or gender expression are irrelevant to being a female; not all anatomical females – particularly not femininsts? – would agree that they have a gender identity or gender expression of a female (or at all).

  3. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    Just so. Everything after ““The regulation agency defines a female as someone whose ‘biological sex is that of a female’” is otiose. Genner idenniny and genner expression don’t change people’s sex.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *