breasts & blood test results

Comments

4 responses to “breasts & blood test results”

1. 

   GW

   May 1, 2026 11:06 AM

   “Because of surgery, I cant produce gametes [i.e. sperm] – but neither can others who have had a hysterectomy [release eggs].”

   But he wants us to think it means: “Because of surgery I can’t release eggs, just as women who have had hysterectomy surgery can’t.”

   Sneaky, especially because most people don’t understand the subterfuge language.
2. 

   Athel Cornish-Bowden

   May 1, 2026 11:52 AM

   I regret that I was one of those who didn’t understand the subterfuge language. I thought this was a real woman who had had a hysterectomy, but on reading carefully I think you’re right that this is a man (and the Wikipedia article about him makes that very plain). As it happens, for the past 40 years I haven’t been able to produce gametes either (for reasons that I won’t go into), but I’ve never suffered any discrimination on that account.
3. 

   Southwest88

   May 1, 2026 12:10 PM

   He has a document that is a legal fiction, male breast tissue that has been enlarged by exogenous hormone use and “blood test results” of what exactly? Funny he has no results from a simple cheek swab chromosome test to show us.
4. 

   Artymorty

   May 1, 2026 1:06 PM

   The activsts who pull the “but look what I look like” card never mention the part that they went out and bought all that cosmetic sex camouflage which they then turn around and try to use as an excuse to be treated literally as the opposite sex.

   He wasn’t born with breasts; he sought them out either by silicone implant or synthetic hormone injection. He doesn’t have blood that shows he’s “female”. He voluntarily chose to undertake a chemical process that somewhat changed his blood chemistry (and certainly didn’t make it “female blood”.)

   He wasn’t born with a “female” birth certificate; he deliberately went through a whole bunch of administrative steps (including paying fees) to get the government to annul his male birth certificate and give him a new, falsified one.

   They always do this: they go far out of their way to emulate an opposite-sex appearance — actions that are fully, consciously made by free choice and which are therefore subject to their own moral accountablity. Then they turn around and complain like it’s all an Act of God that tragically happened to them, a misfortune that’s beyond their control.

   How can you not treat me as female after all this stuff just happened to my body! Look how female I look!

   Firstly, Steph, if you looked unambiguously female you wouldn’t need to advertise your preferred pronouns. With even the slightest bit of in-person or in-video observation, it would become clear that your sex is suspect, and it woudn’t take much at all for anyone to realize you’re male. I’ve never seen you in person but this is the case with virtually all male transsexuals I’ve ever met — and that’s a hell of a lot of them over the past thirty years of living and working within a big-city “LGBT” community.

   Secondly: buyer beware. Purchasing (or getting the government’s health insurance to pay for) body modifications never ever ever came with a guarantee that everyone else in society would have to change the way they see you.

   This second part is where the confusion is. Many people with trans identities really think their gender dysphoria is an unfair misfortune that simply happened to them: that it really is everyone else’s fault that they’re not the sex they want to be and therefore it’s everyone else’s responsibility to make it up to them by shutting up about their actual sex. (Of course, developing the disorder known as gender dysphoria isn’t a conscious act. It’s not immoral to have gender dysphoria. But the actions one takes as a result of it are. That’s moral agency for you.)

   This goes for trans allies, too: a major underlying point of difference between the gender zealots and the gender criticals is that the former group ties gender distress into a social justice worldview, which sees anyone’s perceived misfortune as a social justice issue to be addressed by the whole of society. If a man therefore presents his desire to be female as an unfair social disadvantage, many liberals can’t resist the command to do their part in the tribe, even at the cost of refusing to see the unfairness done to women as a result.

   They see these men’s needs first, and the brain decides the case is closed. It locks out everything that might come clear to them after. Which is, of course, women’s needs. It’s like a first-past-the-post race between men’s needs and women’s: which one does your brain subconsciously process first? If you’re a certain type of liberal and it’s men’s needs you go to first, they take the whole prize and the brain shuts women’s needs out of the picture from that point onward.