Guest post: Because one doctor wouldn’t back down

Originally a comment by Sumi on To discourage the others.

Where are the US doctors willing to be jailed for their beliefs? Where are the doctors willing to rely on the necessity defense and jury nullification?

Canada has had no abortion laws for almost four decades because one doctor, Henry Morgentaler, wouldn’t back down when the government tried to shut his abortion clinics.

Morgentaler survived Auschwitz and Dachau before coming to Canada and completing his medical studies in Montreal. He set up illegal abortion clinics in several cities and dared the governments to act. In 1973, he admitted to performing over 5,000 abortions and was arrested and charged.

Between 1973 and 1975, Morgentaler was tried three times in Montreal; each time, he raised the defence of necessity, and each time, he was acquitted. Prosecutors appealed, the appeals court overturned the jury and ordered him jailed in 1975. He served 10 months, suffering a heart attack while in solitary.

On his release, Morgentaler set up more abortion clinics. By that time, the law had been changed and appeals courts could no longer substitute a conviction for a jury acquittal; they could only order a new trial. With all the jury nullifications, the cops were getting cold feet about further arrests.

In 1982, Canada amended its constitution to bring in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, codifying many of the rights in the American Bill of Rights. Morgentaler challenged Canada’s abortion law under the new Charter. In 1988, the Supreme Court struck down the law as unconstitutional and told Parliament to rewrite it. The House of Commons passed a new bill by nine votes and sent it to the Senate for approval. The bill failed on a tie vote. Since then, Canada has had no criminal restrictions on abortion and it is a publicly funded medical procedure.

I don’t think Canadian juries are more prone to nullification than American ones. Even a rural Texas jury doesn’t want to jail doctors, especially when rural hospitals are closing. Necessity is a common law defense in American law too, typically applying in emergency situations where immediate action is required to avert imminent danger – such as saving the mother’s life. Where’s the doctor crazy enough to do the right thing by the mother, damn the consequences?

Comments

One response to “Guest post: Because one doctor wouldn’t back down”

  1. Omar Avatar

    Necessity is a common law defense in American law too, typically applying in emergency situations where immediate action is required to avert imminent danger – such as saving the mother’s life. Where’s the doctor crazy enough to do the right thing by the mother, damn the consequences?

    The main opponents of a woman’s right to choose on abortion are the Catholic and Orthodox churches who maintain that life begins at conception and thus that abortion is a grave moral evil. In my own younger days, I got into arguments with members of the Catholic Youth and others over this, and concluded that to be consistent, the priests should encourage or demand of their female parishioners that they bring their used sanitary napkins and other cast-off menstrual gear to church for the priest to bless and/or perform the last rites over, just in case they contained a fertilised ovum (ie a zygote) that had not implanted in the uterine wall. According to doctrine, that zygote would have an immortal soul in need of salvation, as it would be inevitably marred by Original Sin. No way out of that.

    But my suggestions always got chucked into the Too Hard theological basket.

    Ah, well. Such is Life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *