All entries by this author

Making “Lessons in Hate and Violence” for Dispatches *

Mar 17th, 2011 | Filed by

“You’re not like the non-Muslims out there,” the teacher says. “All that evil you see in the streets, people not wearing the hijab properly, people smoking… you should hate it, you should hate walking down that street.”… Read the rest



Guardian interviews Tim Flannery *

Mar 17th, 2011 | Filed by

“For 20 years after his return from the Beagle voyage, [Darwin] sat on what he knew were astonishing discoveries.” That’s a myth.… Read the rest



Can we be Good without believing in God?

Mar 16th, 2011 | By Leo Igwe

Can human beings be good without leaning on a god or dogma? Can we be moral without being religious? The answer to these questions is an unequivocal “Yes”. Human beings indeed do not need to believe in a deity or to belong to any religion in order to be good or to do good. The whole idea of the good-of doing good-preceded the idea of a god and religion. In fact the entity called god is alien to the equation of human goodness and morality.

We, humans, do not need to belong to any religion in order to have a sense of moral right or wrong. Moral rectitude is natural, and not predicated on supernatural faith. Morality is a product Read the rest



It does no work because it purportedly does all work

Mar 16th, 2011 1:07 pm | By

Anthony Grayling said more about this possibility of evidence for god question.

I don’t think that every effort has been made to look for evidence and none has turned up…You and Richard think it’s an empirical matter whether there are deities (or fairies? goblins? consider why you think the latter are zoological non-starters) and I think it’s a matter of coherence of the concept…

And, I find, so do I. The more I think about it the more I think that.

The point is that ‘god’ is not like ‘ether’ – it is not amenable to empirical investigation, and does not occupy a slot in some systematic framework of thinking about the world that might be improved on in

Read the rest


“The Evolution and Theology of Cooperation” *

Mar 16th, 2011 | Filed by

And other treats.… Read the rest



Can the brain explain your mind? *

Mar 16th, 2011 | Filed by

Is thinking what the brain does in the way that walking is what the body does? Colin McGinn asks.… Read the rest



Defamation Bill intended to end libel tourism *

Mar 16th, 2011 | Filed by

The draft Defamation Bill will propose a new defence of “honest opinion.” It’s about time!… Read the rest



Pakistan: Xian convicted of “blasphemy” dies in prison *

Mar 16th, 2011 | Filed by

Qamar David was serving a life sentence for insulting the Koran and Muhammad.… Read the rest



Cairo: the army is above the nation, especially women *

Mar 16th, 2011 | Filed by

11 women arrested in Tahrir square were stripped and forcibly examined to determine whether they were virgins.… Read the rest



The Italian government swears the cross is neutral *

Mar 15th, 2011 | Filed by

A gathering place for Jew and Gentile, believer and non-believer. The most ecumenical goddamn thing you ever saw. How can you not just love it?Read the rest



Thomas Nagel reviews David Brooks *

Mar 15th, 2011 | Filed by

Brooks seems willing to take seriously any claim by a cognitive scientist, however idiotic.… Read the rest



Senegal, Mali villages to ban female genital mutilation *

Mar 15th, 2011 | Filed by

Representatives of almost 90 villages in Senegal and Mali agreed to ban FGM at a ceremony in eastern Senegal, a local NGO said Monday.… Read the rest



More on “what is this god thing anyway?”

Mar 15th, 2011 1:43 pm | By

Jerry Coyne is discussing the “what would you consider evidence” question with Anthony Grayling. Anthony says what makes the whole enterprise nonsensical from the start:

on the standard definition of an infinite, omniscient, omnipotent, benevolent etc being – on inspection  such a concept collapses into contradiction and absurdity; as omnipotent, god can eat himself for breakfast…as omniscient it knows the world it  created will cause immense suffering through tsunamis and earthquakes, and therefore has willed that suffering, which contradicts the benevolence claim…etc etc…

Which it seems to me is undeniable, and relevant. What could be evidence for the existence of the usual normal mainstream “God”? Given that the usual normal mainstream “God” is an absurdity, it’s not even possible … Read the rest



No freedom from religion for you

Mar 15th, 2011 1:19 pm | By

Marc Alan di Martino told me an Italian judge had been fired for refusing to work under a crucifix. Yes really. There’s no reporting on it in English; all I could find was a blog post by…well, a theology-fan. The blogger could be writing approvingly.

Italy’s highest court of appeal — the Cassation Court — confirmed today (March 14, 2011) the sacking of a judge who refused to hear cases with the crucifix in the courtroom, according to the Life In Italy website…

The CSM said in its ruling that Tosti – who is a Jew – was guilty of refusing to do his job in the Marche town of Camerino from May 2005 to January 2006, when he withdrew

Read the rest


MP wants “responsible neutrality” on honor killing *

Mar 15th, 2011 | Filed by

 Liberal MP Justin Trudeau said the government should not call honour killings “barbaric” in a study guide for would-be Canadian citizens.… Read the rest



Ben Goldacre on science journalism *

Mar 15th, 2011 | Filed by

“Having a science degree” is partly just a proxy for “caring enough about science generally that you also care about not getting stuff completely wrong.”… Read the rest



Problems in science journalism *

Mar 15th, 2011 | Filed by

We ought to have a rule: if you can’t read the research and comprehend it, you shouldn’t be writing about it.… Read the rest



Grayling and Coyne discuss evidence for “God” *

Mar 15th, 2011 | Filed by

Could there be such a thing?… Read the rest



If it’s new and different, it’s god

Mar 14th, 2011 6:03 pm | By

Why would something new and astonishing and apparently a violation of what we know about nature be evidence of “God” or a god or the supernatural rather than…something new and astonishing and apparently a violation of what we know about nature?

I can easily imagine evidence of something new and astonishing and apparently a violation of what we know about nature. I have a harder time thinking of something that would convince me it was evidence of “God” or a god or the supernatural.

I’m not being stubborn or dogmatic in saying that. I’m saying I just don’t see why something new and the rest of it couldn’t point to A Big Unknown as opposed to the familiar though speculative … Read the rest



A C Grayling on God and disaster *

Mar 14th, 2011 | Filed by

If he is powerful enough to stop an earthquake, but created a world that inflicts agonizing sufferings arbitrarily on sentient creatures, then he is vile.… Read the rest