Author: Ophelia Benson

  • Spam spam and spam

    Sorry I’m a little quiet. You can thank the spambot, for one thing – it deposits comments (porn ads) on an old N&C, and I have to remove them. The number of comments has been steadily rising; it doubled between yesterday and today. Yesterday I had 8 pages to delete, today it’s 18. It’s a slow process – click ‘check all,’ click ‘delete,’ then wait, then click yes, then wait; repeat. 17 times. It’s slow, because I don’t have broadband. I can do other things at the same time, but it’s jerky and interrupted. Deleting 18 pages takes a very long time.

    Anyway, it’s just as well for me to be quieter. I’ve learned that JS has to pay more the more I talk. It had been my understanding that B&W didn’t increase costs, but that was wrong. I have to find some skeptical organization or other that would like to affiliate with B&W and bankroll it in the process. (I tried to insist that I was the one who should pay, but I got nowhere.)

    202 spam comments left to delete. 7 pages. More than half finished. That’s only an hour wasted.

  • Lawrence Krauss Urges: Don’t Vote for Ignorance

    Because scientific literacy does matter, whatever Mike Huckabee thinks.

  • ‘The Memory of Water is a Reality’

    Another example of ‘the hassle barrier’: pretend controversies that rely on bald assertion.

  • Ben Goldacre on Blah Blah Cannabis Blah Blah

    What’s really important is what you do with data. You can mispresent it, and scare people. Or not.

  • How Not to Do It

    If there is one feature which distinguishes medicine from quackery, it is that tradition of critical self-appraisal.

  • Dangerous Nonsense

    The notion that faith is a form of moral fortitude needs to be given the full point-and-laugh treatment.

  • The Apostasy Thing

    ‘Only half a dozen or so Muslim countries actually stipulate capital punishment.’ Oh is that all.

  • The Grand Mufti of Egypt Clears Things Up

    ‘If the crime of undermining the foundations of the society is added to the sin of apostasy, then…’

  • Wendy Kaminer on Supreme Sectarianism

    All five anti-abortion justices are Catholics, but it’s impermissible to mention it.

  • Dear Mufti

    Ah well that is reassuring. The Grand Mufti of Egypt explains about apostasy and stuff.

    [F]rom a religious perspective, the act of abandoning one’s religion is a sin punishable by God on the Day of Judgment. If the case in question is one of merely rejecting faith, then there is no worldly punishment. If, however, the crime of undermining the foundations of the society is added to the sin of apostasy, then the case must be referred to a judicial system whose role is to protect the integrity of the society.

    Excellent. From a religious perspective, no earthly bastards will punish you for apostasy, it’s only God who will. Of course, God will presumably do a pretty thorough job of it, being a jealous and tyrannical kind of shit, but no matter, that’s a few years off probably, unless you get run over by a bus tomorrow. The important thing is that the mullahs and the cops aren’t going to push your door down and take you out for execution right this second. Unless, of course, they are – on account of you done added the crime of undermining the foundations of the society to the sin of apostasy, and that we don’t allow, so up against the wall mothafucka. Because the thing is the sin is God’s business and God will deal with it as and when necessary, but the crime is a whole nother story. The thing is, the integrity of the society has to be protected from the likes of thinking doubting questioning mind-changing you; understand? The integrity of the society is the important thing, not selfish little you and your selfish individualistic atomistic consumerist idea about wanting to think for yourself and make up your own mind and not be compelled to ‘believe’ what you don’t believe. Got that? You don’t matter, the integrity of the society does. No yous matter; all the yous added up don’t matter; what matters is the society and its integrity – in other words its uniformity of thought. Integrity of the individual, poison; integrity of the group, divine Utopia. See? It makes perfect sense if you look at it in the right way.

    There’s also of course the familiar irritating boilerplate about women – equal but not the same blah blah blah so actually they have higher status than men which is why they’re not allowed to leave the house or the country without permission from a man.

    Islam adopts the perspective of gender equality, but it does not endorse the idea of gender equivalency. Islam affirms the difference between the natural dispositions and constitutions of men and women. Women have the ability to bear and nurse children, whereas men do not, so there is a lack of equivalency in regards to the physical and psychological make-up of men and women…

    Therefore…you know the rest.

  • Normblog Writer’s Choice: Julian Baggini

    Humans cannot conquer nature and nor can they just hold hands with it and skip along the lane singing la-di-da.

  • Death Sentences for Two Iranian Journalists

    Iran has sentenced two dissident journalists for being ‘enemies of God.’

  • The Subconscious Mind

    Everyday sights, smells and sounds can selectively activate goals or motives that people already have.

  • Student Arrested for ‘Hate Crime’ for Flushing Koran

    He put a Koran in a toilet on two occasions.

  • Meet ‘Christians United for Israel’

    Its support for Israel derives from the belief that Jesus will return after Armageddon. Wheee!

  • Tu quoque

    Research misconduct is in the eye of the beholder; so is evidence; so is replication; so is falsification; so is peer review; it’s all, all in the eye of the beholder. Knowledge is power, therefore I don’t need to make sense.

    [T]he firing of Churchill reveals a very pernicious kind of exclusionary dogmatism in scholarly research and writing and media reporting. The firing of Professor Churchill for alleged research misconduct…ignored all Indigenous evidence and perspectives that are critical of Eurocentric versions of the history of the European invasion of the Americas. Research misconduct is in the eye of the beholder. Euroamerican teachers and scholars have taught and written for several centuries that Columbus discovered America. That is a more profound and easily provable case of research misconduct than anything of which Churchill has been accused.

    Gary Witherspoon confuses teaching the content of a textbook with research, which is odd, since he is apparently an anthropologist, so one would assume he must have learned at some point along the path to becoming an anthropologist what research is and what it isn’t. Maybe he has a bad memory, maybe he’s just forgotten what research is. Couldn’t someone tell him though?

    The whole article goes on in the same vein, citing what a 1987 textbook said, what an 1864 Rocky Mountain News article said (that’s not a typo – 1864, a century and a half ago), what Ben Nighthorse Campbell said about the massacre that the Rocky Mountain News misunderstood a century and a half ago – all apparently in aid of the point that research misconduct is in the eye of the beholder. In other words, these other people over here killed ten people and ate them for lunch, so why are you making such a fuss about my killing one person and eating her for lunch? In other words, it’s infantile and jaw-droppingly stupid. It’s also a pretty brazen example of epistemic relativism in all its tinsel glory.