All entries by this author

The Problem is not New

May 4th, 2005 2:12 am | By

We have some allies in the battle against Ruseism and Evansism. PZ at Pharyngula is kind enough to say that I’ve been on a tear lately. Pardon me while I blush and simper. But then who could help being on a tear, with so much provocation around. Anyway PZ is helping with the tearing and shredding, which is good, because my desk is about to collapse under the weight of work I have on hand.

Evans has this idea that religion is a kind of symbolic art, and that atheists are criticizing it as a bad painting, while all the good religious people are sharing his view of it as an elaborate metaphor for life. That is false. Atheists

Read the rest


No Respect

May 4th, 2005 1:16 am | By

I meant to do this sooner but things have been horribly busy. But a correspondent tells me that Oona King needs all the volunteers she can get; the SWP and the MAB will be out in force on election day. I’m 6000 miles from Bow and Bethnal Green, but I know some of you are much closer than that. Her office is 0207 613 4749.… Read the rest



I thought it was just a large watermelon

May 3rd, 2005 5:41 pm | By

Update on the Dylan Evans article. New information. This just in. Your correspondent has learned. In short, my colleague tells me that Dylan Evans has said sensible things at times. For instance in a certain philosophy magazine that my colleague has something to do with.

It’s very confounding, frankly. Because some of the things he says in that there magazine seem diametrically opposed to the things he says in that Guardian article. Are there pod people in his garden, I wonder? Or has he simply had a radical change of mind.

For instance, from a TPM-sponsored public debate on the issues raised by a paper given by Professor John Dupré at the
Mind/ Aristotelian Society Joint Session titled ‘Against … Read the rest



David Horowitz *

May 3rd, 2005 | Filed by

Is it about the ideas or the funding?… Read the rest



John Brockman – Not Just a High Class Pimp *

May 3rd, 2005 | Filed by

Has helped make Dawkins and Dennett popular; also Sheldrake and Bible code guy.… Read the rest



New Elitism Romanticizes the Lumpenproletariat *

May 3rd, 2005 | Filed by

Fawning on misogynist rappers while scorning ‘Afristocratic’ critics of same.… Read the rest



Religion is Actually a Work of Art *

May 3rd, 2005 | Filed by

Oh really? On what planet?… Read the rest



Who Needs an Excuse?

May 3rd, 2005 2:00 am | By

Oh honestly. What was that I said about the unending flood? Here is another break in the dam – more nonsense than I’ve seen in one place for a long time. (Well not all that long. There was that Butlerian review the other day, and that item where paganism meets disability rights and gets spectacularly tangled in its own feet. But a long time if you’re waiting for lunch, anyway.) If you can read this without wanting to be violently sick – then there’s something wrong with your cognitive functioning and I want nothing further to do with you.

There are many species of atheism, just as there are many species of religion. But while many religions still thrive, most

Read the rest


Transcendental Science

May 2nd, 2005 8:53 pm | By

Good. After Michael Ruse it’s a relief to read Dawkins on the same general subject.

You can’t statistically explain improbable things like living creatures by saying that they must have been designed because you’re still left to explain the designer, who must be, if anything, an even more statistically improbable and elegant thing. Design can never be an ultimate explanation for anything. It can only be a proximate explanation. A plane or a car is explained by a designer but that’s because the designer himself, the engineer, is explained by natural selection.

And it’s no good pretending otherwise, is it, especially if you simply can’t possibly believe that otherwise. It’s ridiculous to expect it. And then, it’s not as … Read the rest



Richard Dawkins Interview in Salon *

May 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

People brought up to believe in faith cannot be persuaded by evidence to change their minds. … Read the rest



Can You Say ‘Oxymoron’? *

May 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

Zimbabwe re-elected to UN Human Rights Commission.… Read the rest



Mythic History and WWII *

May 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

The effort to create some new myths fell foul of the shocking reality.… Read the rest



The Other 1905 Revolution – Einstein’s *

May 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

Why part molasses part sand, part soup part pile of shot?… Read the rest



Women in the Middle East *

May 2nd, 2005 | Filed by

There are a lot of books on the subject, and people are reading them.… Read the rest



Apostasy, Human Rights, Religion and Belief

May 2nd, 2005 | By Ibn Warraq

The very notion of apostasy has vanished from the West where one would talk of being a lapsed Catholic or non-practising Christian rather than an apostate. There are certainly no penal sanctions for converting from Christianity to any other religion. In Islamic countries, on the other hand, the issue is far from dead.

The Arabic word for apostate is murtadd, the one who turns back from Islam, and apostasy is denoted by irtidad and ridda. Ridda seems to have been used for apostasy from Islam into unbelief ( in Arabic, kufr ), and irtidad from Islam to some other religion.(1) A person born of Muslim parents who later rejects Islam is called a Murtadd Fitri – fitri meaning natural, it … Read the rest



A Subtle Ruse, But It Won’t Do

May 1st, 2005 9:43 pm | By

Michael Ruse. [shakes head] I don’t know, I just don’t know. I simply can’t agree. I think he’s wrong. I think it’s bad (or at least dubious) tactics and I think it’s even worse morality and epistemology.

But those are two different things. I know, I know. Is and ought; facts and values. But lying about the one takes you into questions about the other. Which is a roundabout way of saying that even if it were good tactics I don’t think it’s morally respectable to tell lies about what you take to be the truth for tactical reasons. At least not on the whole; not in general; not as a rule. In life and death situations (a murderer … Read the rest



Michael Ruse Scolds Biologists for Being Atheists *

May 1st, 2005 | Filed by

Because it pisses off creationists.… Read the rest



Nick Cohen on a Culture of Sickly Revelation *

May 1st, 2005 | Filed by

Privacy? Wozzat?… Read the rest



I Once Was Lost, But Now I’m Found

May 1st, 2005 2:07 am | By

Wow. If you can read this story without getting choked or moved or stirred or some other way shaken, you’re a stronger man than I am, Gunga Din. But then I’m a sucker for resurrection stories.

The spectacular ivory-billed woodpecker, which was declared extinct in 1920, has been found alive in North America, Science magazine reports. The news has stunned ornithologists worldwide, with some comparing the discovery to finding the dodo…The find has ignited hope that other “extinct” birds may be clinging on to survival in isolated places. “This find is so significant that it is really difficult to describe,” Alistair Gammell, of the UK’s Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), told BBC News. “We sadly won’t rediscover

Read the rest


Nice Timing, Guys *

Apr 30th, 2005 | Filed by

Churchill has exams to grade, rallies to attend.… Read the rest