All entries by this author

Excluded *

Aug 27th, 2004 | Filed by

Blunkett bans animal rights campaigner Jerry Vlasak.… Read the rest



Free Speech Shouldn’t Cover Death Threats *

Aug 27th, 2004 | Filed by

Blunkett was right to ban animal rights ‘activist.’… Read the rest



Outrage at Harker on OutRage *

Aug 27th, 2004 | Filed by

Music is important to black people, and not being beaten to death is important to gay people.… Read the rest



Hey, it’s Popular *

Aug 27th, 2004 | Filed by

‘Music is very important to black people,’ so if it advocates killing gays – er – shut up?… Read the rest



Work of Art Thrown in Bin and Badly Damaged *

Aug 27th, 2004 | Filed by

Tragedy at Tate when cleaner throws away bin liner filled with waste paper.… Read the rest



From Multiculturalism to Where? *

Aug 26th, 2004 | Filed by

The city on a hill where everyone celebrates differences isn’t working out.… Read the rest



Margaret Talbot on Munchausen’s by Proxy *

Aug 26th, 2004 | Filed by

Naming a syndrome can create it, and when is a crime a ‘disorder’?… Read the rest



‘A Good Book Should Make You Cry’? *

Aug 26th, 2004 | Filed by

The lachrymose world of the problem novel for children.… Read the rest



Epistemology for Toddlers

Aug 25th, 2004 11:40 pm | By

I mentioned that I’ve been reading Sandra Harding. I have. Therefore I need to vent. I also need to write in short simple clause-free declarative sentences, because that’s the way Harding writes, and it’s catching.

Reading Harding is a very strange experience. I keep wondering – huh? What happened? Why did this book get published? Why didn’t anyone shove it back at her and say (at the very least), ‘I’m sorry but you’ll have to re-write this for grown-ups. Children don’t read books about epistemology.’ Why does she write the way she does? Why do people let her? And then publish it? And then why do other people buy the books and read them? And why, godgivemestrength, why do people … Read the rest



Undercurrent

Aug 25th, 2004 7:28 pm | By

Just to gather them all in one place. Jonathan Derbyshire has a post about the vexed (especially around here – we vex the damn thing to death) matter of the, shall we say, tender-mindedness of some parts of the left toward Islamism.

There seems to me to be an essential continuity between the stance adopted towards radical Islam by the intellectual left broadly conceived (and not just the SWP), and certain of the attitudes that characterised the so-called ‘New Left’ in the 1960s, and which were brilliantly diagnosed by Irving Howe in a wonderful 1965 essay entitled ‘New Styles in “Leftism”‘…

Yes, I like Howe, and he looks better all the time. He nailed the anti-intellectual aspect of the New … Read the rest



Convicted Murderer Flees Extradition *

Aug 25th, 2004 | Filed by

Chooses ‘green of life’ over ‘grey of legal punishment’. For himself, that is.… Read the rest



Salim Mansur on Selective Outrage *

Aug 25th, 2004 | Filed by

The victims are black and non-Arab; the victimizers are of Arab origin. … Read the rest



Outrage! Plan Mobo Protest *

Aug 25th, 2004 | Filed by

Gay rights group to pressure the BBC not to broadcast the music of black artists who promote homophobia.… Read the rest



Running Around

Aug 24th, 2004 9:47 pm | By

Just thought I’d say – there’s an interesting post on JerryS’ Running Madness at Hugo Schwyzer’s blog. It gets a tad religious at one point for my taste, but it’s interesting all the same. Bears out what JS says. Runners will damage themselves rather than stop, and there is a moralistic aspect to that. ‘Coming from a runner, that’s terribly refreshing,’ Hugo says of my colleague’s observation: ‘there isn’t a moral requirement that we should fulfill our potentials; if people are happy with mediocrity, as I am, then let them be.’

I’ve often finished races or long training runs while feeling ill. I’ve only once dropped out of a marathon, down in Long Beach in 2001. I walked off the

Read the rest


Chip Chip Chipping Away *

Aug 24th, 2004 | Filed by

Dahlia Lithwick looks at holes in the wall between church and state.… Read the rest



Reported Execution of 16-year-old Girl in Iran *

Aug 24th, 2004 | Filed by

Ateqeh Rajabi reportedly publicly hanged for ‘acts incompatible with chastity.’… Read the rest



Adam and Eve and Steve and Bill and Sal and *

Aug 24th, 2004 | Filed by

What do nature and tradition really say about the meaning of marriage?… Read the rest



Interview with Habermas *

Aug 24th, 2004 | Filed by

What separates him from Derrida is the later Heidegger.… Read the rest



Requiem for Ateqeh Rajabi

Aug 24th, 2004 | By Maryam Namazie

16 year old Ateqeh Rajabi was publicly hanged in the city centre in Neka in the northern Iranian province of Mazandaran on 15 August for ‘acts incompatible with chastity’ after having been arrested a few months earlier for having sexual relations. She had no attorney at any stage of the farce.

During the ‘trial’, she expressed her outrage at the misogyny and injustice in society and ‘judicial’ system and even removed some of her clothing. The lower court ‘judge’ was so incensed by her protestations that he personally put the noose around her neck after his decision had been upheld by the ‘Supreme Court’.

In some reports on her execution, Ateqah has been labelled ‘mentally incompetent’.

I suppose it could … Read the rest



Running Madness

Aug 23rd, 2004 3:45 pm | By

It’s funny all this fuss over Paula Radcliffe.

The first thing to say is that if you haven’t tried to run a marathon quickly, in the heat, then you should keep quiet about whether she could have continued, etc. When the wheels come off marathon running, then it feels pretty much unlike anything else you’ll experience in life. I experienced it in a London marathon. I got to twenty miles in just over two hours. It took an hour and ten minutes to run the next six miles, so you get the picture.

But the interesting thing from a philosophical, sociological point of view is that somehow moral judgements seem to infect how we view sporting feats. It isn’t … Read the rest