Perfect.
All entries by this author
Burning the house down from the inside
Jul 26th, 2018 10:48 am | By Ophelia BensonJennifer Rubin finds the “impeach Rosenstein” stunt warped and contemptible.
… Read the restThe damage here is being done not by Rosenstein, but by irresponsible, hyper-partisan congressmen. Former White House ethics counsel Norman Eisen and Fred Wertheimer, founder of Democracy 21, recently wrote about the impeachment gambit:
Key House Republicans are abusing their offices and the public trust to blindly provide protection for [President] Trump. They are doing so instead of working to get to the bottom of the worst foreign attack on American elections in our history.
They need to be called on their scandalous efforts to undermine the Mueller investigation and ignore Russia’s cyber invasion of our democracy. A bipartisan outcry greeted Trump’s Helsinki betrayals. We should be hearing protests at
Wrapped in an enigma
Jul 26th, 2018 10:32 am | By Ophelia BensonIt’s the most conservative, farthest right Republicans who are pushing the impeachment of Rosenstein ploy, and what I’m wondering at the moment is what, exactly, is conservative about their lust to sabotage Mueller’s investigation.
After all, Mueller is a Republican, and a former Marine who fought in Vietnam, and a former head of the FBI. You would think all three of those descriptors would place him way the hell up there on the Conservative Checklist. Conservatives and Republicans generally favor other conservatives and Republicans, and men who enlisted voluntarily to fight in Vietnam, especially Marines. (I say “men” because the same doesn’t apply to women: conservatives and Republicans prefer the women to stay home and wait for their men to … Read the rest
Government at its finest
Jul 25th, 2018 5:20 pm | By Ophelia BensonConservative lawmakers on Wednesday introduced a resolution calling for the impeachment of Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, in a move that marks a dramatic escalation in the battle over the special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The effort, spearheaded by Reps. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), also sets up a showdown with House Republican leaders, who have distanced themselves from calls to remove Rosenstein from office. But Meadows and Jordan stopped short of forcing an immediate vote on the measure, sparing Republican lawmakers for now from a potential dilemma.
They used to be the lawnorder party, but now they’re the party of protect the sleazy corrupt rapey … Read the rest
Locker up
Jul 25th, 2018 4:40 pm | By Ophelia BensonSteve Almond was doing a reading last week, and during the q and a afterwards a guy delivered an aria of rage about Hillary Clinton.
… Read the restI thought about this guy as I watched a video clip of Attorney General Jeff Sessions speaking to a group of young conservatives on Tuesday. The high schoolers spontaneously start chanting “Lock her up” and Sessions — our nation’s top law enforcement official — repeats their words and chuckles fondly.
As you may remember, “Lock her up” was the central rallying cry at the Republican National Convention. Forget policy proposals aimed at helping working Americans, or hopeful slogans. Instead, the most salient message from one of our two major political parties was simply that
How dare you ask questions
Jul 25th, 2018 3:34 pm | By Ophelia BensonTrump and his pimps continue his war on the press.
The White House took retaliatory action against Kaitlan Collins, a White House reporter for CNN, after Collins asked President Trump questions at an Oval Office photo op on Wednesday.
Collins was representing all the television networks as the “pool reporter” in the room during the early afternoon meeting between Trump and Jean-Claude Juncker, the president of the European Commission.
It is customary for the press pool to lob a few questions at the president. Sometimes Trump responds; other times he does not.
Collins asked him some questions about Putin and Cohen, and he didn’t answer. Later the White House told the press about an unexpected press availability with Trump … Read the rest
Trump’s nightmare
Jul 25th, 2018 11:46 am | By Ophelia BensonTrump loses big: the emoluments case is going ahead.
… Read the restThis is the nightmare — or one of them — that Trump has long feared, namely litigation in which his business operations, perhaps even his tax returns, are laid bare. Norman Eisen, who is co-counsel with the District and Maryland, tells me, “It is another major crack in the dam that has so far been holding back accountability. [Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III] is closing in; [Michael] Cohen is about to cut a deal; and now we have taken another leap forward in being able to understand how Trump is profiting off the presidency, including possibly from Russia.” He adds, “‘Follow the money,’ the old adage goes, and we
In the middle of that question
Jul 25th, 2018 10:35 am | By Ophelia BensonWhat actually happened with that transcript and video, according to Philip Bump in the Post:
… Read the restHere’s the thing: That’s also how The Post’s transcript of the news conference initially read, too. Ours came from Bloomberg Government and ours, too, excluded the first part of the reporters question in which he begins, “President Putin, did you want President Trump to win the election”.
What happened? If you watch the videos, it’s pretty clear. At some point in the middle of that question, there’s a switch between the feed from the reporters and the feed from the translator. In the White House version of the video, you can hear the question being asked very faintly under the woman who is translating
Memory hole
Jul 25th, 2018 10:20 am | By Ophelia Benson[But see update]
Wow. Sorry to do the naïve surprised-shocked thing yet again, but I am surprised-shocked. The White House is 1984ing us. Its official transcript and video of the Trump-Putin press conference last week both have a missing piece – a sliced out, concealed, censored piece. Can you guess which one? It’s where the Reuters reporter asks Putin if he wanted Trump to win and Putin says “Yes I did, yes I did.”
White House edits video to remove question about whether Putin wanted Trump to win. pic.twitter.com/ExlsHNlgF8
— Maddow Blog (@MaddowBlog) July 25, 2018
Updating to add: Washington Post reporter Philip Bump says that’s not what happened, that it was a glitch not a deliberate censoring.
… Read the restMaddow is
Provide counterpoints
Jul 25th, 2018 10:08 am | By Ophelia BensonThe Guardian runs an open letter to Mark Zuckerberg from the parents of one of the children murdered at Sandy Hook:
… Read the restSince that day, we, as well as the parents, family, and friends of the 25 other victims, have been embroiled in a constant battle with social media providers, including Facebook, to protect us from harassment and threats.
Almost immediately after the massacre of 20 little children, all under the age of seven, and six elementary school teachers and staff, the attacks on us began. Conspiracy groups and anti-government provocateurs began making claims on Facebook that the massacre was a hoax, that the murdered were so-called “crisis actors” and that their audience should rise up to “find out the
Just another day in Trexit
Jul 25th, 2018 9:35 am | By Ophelia BensonJonathan Freedland points out how each new disclosure simply slides off Trump:
… Read the rest…late on Tuesday, the lawyer for Michael Cohen – Donald Trump’s personal attorney, fixer and keeper of his secrets – released a tape in which he and Trump are heard discussing how exactly to fund the silencing of a former Playboy model, Karen McDougal. Cohen apparently wanted it be handled legally, while Trump seemingly had other ideas.
“We’ll have to pay,” Cohen says. Trump’s reply: “Pay with cash.”
Put aside the impact an equivalent revelation about Clinton would have made in 1992. Just imagine the storm this would have caused if it had come out at the time Cohen and Trump had that conversation, just two months
A commitment to the work she is doing
Jul 24th, 2018 5:03 pm | By Ophelia BensonPrincess Ivanka has decided to close down her “fashion brand.” Her explanation is that she owes it to her Important Work.
In a statement, Ms. Trump characterized the move as being driven by a commitment to the work she is doing as part of her father’s administration.
“After 17 months in Washington, I do not know when or if I will ever return to the business,” Ms. Trump said, “but I do know that my focus for the foreseeable future will be the work I am doing here in Washington, so making this decision now is the only fair outcome for my team and partners.”
The “work” she is doing – what work? What work can she do? She has … Read the rest
Suit the word to the occasion
Jul 24th, 2018 4:50 pm | By Ophelia BensonToday Trump went to give the annual address to the Veterans of Foreign Wars, which is a thing presidents do.
“Don’t believe the crap you hear from these people — the fake news,” Trump told the crowd of veterans. “What you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening.”
Raising the issue of immigration, Trump claimed many Democratic politicians are “disciples of a very low IQ person,” Rep. Maxine Waters, a frequent Democratic critic of the President’s. He also falsely accused Democrats of being “OK” with crime in the US.
“They want open borders, and crime’s OK,” Trump said. “We want strong borders and we want no crime.”
The usual vulgar lies and abuse, in short. Thanks for … Read the rest
More blue dots
Jul 24th, 2018 12:24 pm | By Ophelia BensonOliver Burkeman explains how it can be true both that things are overall getting better and that we still run around with our hair on fire because of all the things that are getting worse. There’s this study…
… Read the restIn the experiment, participants were shown hundreds of dots in shades from deep purple to deep blue, and asked to say whether each was blue or not. Obviously, the bluer a dot, the more likely people were to classify it as blue. But what’s interesting is what happened when researchers began reducing the prevalence of the blue dots they displayed. The fewer dots that were objectively blue, the broader people’s definition of “blue” became: they started to classify purplish dots that
Do it to them
Jul 24th, 2018 11:35 am | By Ophelia BensonRebecca Morin at Politico on Trump’s grotesque “Russia is helping the Democrats!” tweet:
… Read the rest“I’m very concerned that Russia will be fighting very hard to have an impact on the upcoming Election. Based on the fact that no President has been tougher on Russia than me, they will be pushing very hard for the Democrats. They definitely don’t want Trump!” the president tweeted.
The tweet follows a week of backlash from Republicans and Democrats alike from the president’s summit with Vladimir Putin, in which he appeared to side with the Russian president over his own intelligence officers on whether Moscow interfered in the 2016 election.
During that same news conference, Putin explicitly stated that he did want Trump to win, which
Jeff and the snowflakes
Jul 24th, 2018 10:43 am | By Ophelia BensonJeff Sessions decides that of all the things we have to worry about right now, the prospect of a generation of “supercilious sensitive snowflakes” is major enough that he should fret about it in a speech.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions was speaking at an event hosted by the conservative group Turning Point USA on Tuesday when the crowd began to chant, “Lock her up.” The phrase was a common refrain among supporters of Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign and referred to the desired punishment for his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton.
Sessions, whose position advising that campaign was parlayed into one as the nation’s chief law enforcement official, chuckled.
Heh heh heh. Chuckle chuckle chuckle. These guys are such … Read the rest
Based on the what now?
Jul 24th, 2018 10:31 am | By Ophelia BensonTrolling.
I’m very concerned that Russia will be fighting very hard to have an impact on the upcoming Election. Based on the fact that no President has been tougher on Russia than me, they will be pushing very hard for the Democrats. They definitely don’t want Trump!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 24, 2018
Certain institutional norms and customs
Jul 24th, 2018 5:28 am | By Ophelia BensonBradley Moss at Lawfare on the taking away security clearances issue:
Trump is considering steps by which their clearances can be revoked because “they’ve politicized and, in some cases, monetized their public service and security clearances,” as well as “ma[de] baseless accusations of improper contact with Russia or being influenced by Russia against the President.” In 11 years of representing civilian employees, military personnel, political appointees and government contractors in security clearance proceedings, I can say with certainty that these types of “allegations” are nothing like anything I have ever seen in a memorandum outlining bases for denying or revoking a security clearance.
As usual with them, it’s not normal, but can they do it? It depends.
There’s a … Read the rest
Guest post: Those Trump voters we’re supposed to respect
Jul 23rd, 2018 5:28 pm | By Ophelia BensonOriginally a comment by Screechy Monkey on It’s the sense of entitlement.
Here are some more of those Trump voters we’re supposed to respect.
People who believe in a literal, physical hell and heaven, and speculate on what appliances they will have in their kitchen in heaven. (But I was assured that Gnu Atheists were arguing against a literal form of religion that nobody actually believes!)
People who dismiss Trump’s vileness on the grounds that “we are not to judge,” but claim that Hillary Clinton is “of Satan.”
People who believe Obama was a Muslim.
People who believe that the annihilation of Christians in America is nigh. (But don’t you dare call them delusional!)
People who believe that when Jesus … Read the rest
Guest post: It just doesn’t compute
Jul 23rd, 2018 5:21 pm | By Ophelia BensonOriginally a comment by Noxious Nan on It’s the sense of entitlement.
We’ve received the hard sell for accepting Trump voters as good people who were tired and wanted a change. It’s been such a hard sell, that I’ve really tried to visualize tolerant people driven to such a point that they would vote for Trump….It just doesn’t compute.
As someone defending these voters, Skeletor, please explain to me how it computes! Every line I try leads to eventual conscious racism or misogyny on the part of the imagined voter.
As a woman I experience misogyny every single day, albeit most of the time it is limited to small, subtle demonstrations and messages. These demonstrations come from loved ones … Read the rest
