There’s a step missing

Dec 26th, 2024 11:17 am | By

How does anyone manage to believe this? The Washington Post:

NEW CASTLE, Pennsylvania — Lori Mosura goes to the grocery store on a bicycle because she can’t afford to fix her Ford F-150 truck.

The single mother and her 17-year-old son live in an apartment that is so small she sleeps in the dining room. They receive $1,200 each month in food stamps and Social Security benefits but still come up short. Mosura said she often must decide whether to buy milk or toilet paper.

It was all that penny-pinching that drove the part-time tax consultant to abandon the Democratic Party this fall and vote for Donald Trump.

“He is more attuned to the needs of everyone instead of just the rich,” Mosura, 55, said on a recent afternoon. “I think he knows it’s the poor people that got him elected, so I think Trump is going to do more to help us.”

???????

What on earth could possibly lead anyone to think that?

He’s not attuned to anyone’s needs, and he’s sure as hell not attuned to the needs of poor people.

I can’t figure out what chain of reasoning could get anyone there.

He was never a landlord attuned to the needs of poor people, nor an employer attuned to the needs of poor people, nor a private citizen attuned to the needs of poor people, nor a tv star attuned to the needs of poor people.

Now, low-income Americans who voted for Trump say they are counting on him to keep their benefits intact even while his Cabinet picks and Republican lawmakers call on him to reduce federal spending.

Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy — whom Trump has chosen to lead a new nongovernmental advisory panel, the “Department of Government Efficiency” — have said they want to trim $2 trillion from the government’s annual budget, a cut that some experts say could be accomplished only by slashing entitlement programs. Trump’s pick for White House budget director was a key architect of Project 2025, a plan drawn up by conservatives to guide his second term that calls for steep cuts to programs such as food stamps. And GOP leaders in Congress and Trump advisers are considering significant changes to Medicaid, food stamps and other federal aid.

That’s because they’re so attuned to the needs of poor people.



Let nothing go unspoiled

Dec 26th, 2024 3:23 am | By

The Associated Press had a contest to name Female Athlete of the Year. You know what comes next.

A group of 74 sports journalists from The Associated Press and its members voted on the award.

Clark received 35 votes, Olympic gymnast Simone Biles was second with 25.

But Olympic gold medalist boxer Imane Khelif was third, getting four votes.

Naturally. If you have an item for women – an event, a list, a contest – it’s important to add men, because women must not be allowed to have anything all to themselves.



Boldly to go

Dec 26th, 2024 3:08 am | By

The BBC’s obsession with drag queens continues.

Strictly to feature first drag queen competitor

Notice the weird chummy insiderism of the title. Wtf does it even mean? It looks like an uncompleted thought rather than a title. It’s a cozy reference to a tv program that everyone who matters knows all about so no need to spell out the program’s actual title; it’s so much cuter to use just the first word of the title, and let everyone who isn’t in on the joke puzzle over the meaning.

Does the Beeb always do that, or only when the subject is drag queens? Does it refer to “Call” instead of “Call the Midwife”?

No. The BBC doesn’t do that.

Strictly’s Christmas Special will see the show mark another first in its 20th year – its first drag queen competitor.

Ooooooh really? Let’s all piss ourselves with excitement. A drag queen!!! Eeeek!!!

And next week, a blackface minstrel will read the 9 o’clock news, right? And the BBC will squee about a minstrel reading the 9? Yes?

Tayce said she was proud to be the first drag artist to take part on the series and was taking a stand against those who might criticise the move.

Oh good. What a noble cause. Let’s have more and more and more men mocking women on the BBC so that we can have more and more cozy insidery BBC stories about them.

Tayce said: “It’s such an honour and a privilege to be pushing the boundaries as the first drag queen on the show because it’s been on for so many years.

Yeah push those boundaries that indicate let’s not mock the underlings. MOCK ALL THE UNDERLINGS. Well not all. Not absolutely all. Not immigrants or people of color or “queer” people, but women, hell yes, women exist to be mocked.



Guest post: The world’s first “defensive democracy”

Dec 25th, 2024 5:26 pm | By

Originally a comment by Der Durchwanderer on Check the label.

Liberal democracy does not depend on silly lies about who can do what in the way of magic personal changes.

Aye, but there’s the rub. Germany is slowly (actually not-so-slowly) ceasing to recognise itself as a liberal democracy as you might understand that term; it sees itself, rather, as the world’s first “defensive democracy”. Its politicians regularly tar any opinions, statements, or policies which disagree with the ruling coalition as “anti-democratic”, regardless of how soundly those opinions, statements, and policies are founded in the principals of liberalism nor how widely they are to be found amongst the demos itself.

Anything that does not fit onto the tip of the spear of progressive thought as interpreted by the youth wings of the Greens and the SPD is classified as “right-wing extremism”, and things as banal as retweeting a meme that takes the piss out of a government minister are likely to have that minister personally file a complaint with the police under the law of “impeding a public officer in his duties”, which will get your house searched by the cops and see you with a hefty fine backed with the threat of jail time.

Now it appears that the German agency charged with “protecting the constitution” may well consider any public utterances in support of the “gender binary” to be statements against the German constitutional order, perhaps classifying them in the recently-invented category of “delegitimation of the state relevant to constitutional protection”, wherein the constitutional protectors give themselves the right to spy on German citizens who make suspect-but-not-illegal statements against the government until they find something they can prosecute for. (This extralegal category was invented in April 2021, largely in response to mass protests against anti-COVID measures, many of which were themselves unconstitutional and of dubious efficacy…but though the pandemic is over, the tools forged during it remain, and will take much longer to dismantle.)



There’s more than one way to bully

Dec 25th, 2024 3:01 pm | By

So kids in school can be compelled, by the school, to use wrong, counter-intuitive, fantasy-based “pronouns” in conversation.

A federal appeals court decided on Friday to revisit its recent decision to uphold a central Ohio school district’s right to enforce policies against the bullying of transgender students, which had been challenged by a conservative parents group.

That’s very misleading. Of course schools should have and enforce policies against bullying, but failing or even refusing to join someone else’s fantasy isn’t bullying. Arguably the demand to be called anything non-intuitive is itself a bullying move. If you’re ordered to call people by the counter-intuitive pronouns, you’re going to have to work hard to remember to do it and avoid being tripped up by the deeply entrenched habit of knowing who is a she and who is a he. You have to override your own instincts instead of having an ordinary relaxed conversation.

There’s also the small matter of endorsing a lie, which schools really shouldn’t be forcing students to do.

I get that the whole thing can be a setup for deliberate bullying, but that’s part of the problem with the whole stupid fad for luxury pronouns. Kids in school shouldn’t be making luxury demands of that kind, it just gums up the works.

Olentangy, located near Columbus, sought to prohibit the “misgendering” of transgender students, including by failing to address them by their preferred pronouns.

See, that’s not fair. It’s not reasonable. It’s not what school is for. What if there are no “transgender students”? What if they’re just students who have fallen for a dopy fad? What if there are not even any students who genuinely feel “trapped in the wrong body” or similar? What if all this heavy breathing about misgendering is a silly nothingburger that needs to go away so that we can pay attention to important things?

The case is one of many around the country addressing the rights of transgender students.

For the millionth time: there’s no such thing as a right to force other people to call you what you’re not. That’s not a right. It bears little resemblance to a right.



Vast empty land mass

Dec 25th, 2024 2:18 pm | By

Denmark has a nice dry wit.

https://twitter.com/joncoopertweets/status/1871992982767038872


Check the label

Dec 25th, 2024 11:29 am | By

From Reduxx:

The German federal government was responsible for funding a research project labeling “organized transphobia” a threat to democracy. The project, which was made in collaboration with a trans-identified male known for threatening violence against women he disagrees with, classifies those opposed to Germany’s radical gender self-identification laws as “enemies” of society.

Hm. Man who threatens violence against women labels disobedient women “a threat to democracy.” So democracy=men forcing women to lie about who is a woman? Weird definition.

Days ago, the Institute for Democracy and Civil Society (IDZ Jenapublished a brochure reporting the outcome of a research project it had undertaken on “Organized Transphobia: Concepts, Actors, Narratives, and Counter-Strategies.” In the 92-page release, it concluded that transphobia poses a danger to democratic co-existence and outlines strategies to tackle radical feminists who define biological sex as binary.

Reminds me of The Church. “Non-adherence to our belief system=danger to the communniny & scary radical badness.”

And while we’re on the subject, let’s pause for a second to ponder the danger to democratic co-existence that is trans ideology. Bullying, lying, manipulating, extorting, punishing – none of that is a boon to democratic co-existence.

The research project, published in collaboration with the Federal Association for Transgender People (BVT), was funded by the German government through the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth, which provided it a total of 228,833 Euros.

The project portrays feminists critical of gender ideology as enemies of the state who, together with right-wing extremists, pursue a political agenda to maintain an “endo-cis-binary gender system” – something that is deemed incompatible with the “principles of liberal democracy.”

I don’t know what the “endo” means there, it may be a mistranslation of the German, but other than that the meaning is clear enough: knowing there are two sexes that can’t swap is incompatible with the principles of liberal democracy.

I beg to differ. Liberal democracy does not depend on silly lies about who can do what in the way of magic personal changes. People can’t think themselves into being leopards or houses or Brazil or Mars, and that fact does no harm to liberal democracy.



Trademark violation

Dec 25th, 2024 10:12 am | By

So dignified.

Gibson, the maker of famous electric guitars, has issued a cease and desist order to the company behind a range of “Trump Guitars” endorsed by the US president-elect.

Gibson told Guitar World, which first reported the story, it took action because the design of the instruments being sold as Trump Guitars “infringes upon Gibson’s exclusive trademarks, particularly the iconic Les Paul body shape”.

Named for the American musician the Guardian once said “basically invented the electric guitar”, Gibson Les Pauls have been sold since 1952 and played by countless rock legends, among them the Edge of U2, Jimmy Page of Led Zeppelin and Slash of Guns N’ Roses.

Trump Guitars were announced last week, as the latest in a line of merchandise including Biblessneakerswatches and even digital trading cards.

Well of course; all incoming heads of state do that.

Or do they? Am I wrong?

Last week Trump posted to his social media platform a picture of him holding a guitar emblazoned with a US flag and a bald eagle, with the message: “Coming Soon! The Limited Edition ‘45’ Guitar. Only 1,300 of each Acoustic and Electric Guitars MADE – Some personally signed!”

Sure. Remember when Obama promoted basketballs with his name on them? No? Ok what about dog collars with his name on them? No? Erm…coffee mugs? Picnic baskets? Cameras? Cars? There must have been something.

On Wednesday, a website for Trump Guitars featured a picture of the president-elect signing an instrument. Two models were marked sold out: American Eagle electric guitars (priced $1,500) and autographed American Eagle electric guitars ($11,500).

Unsigned ($1,250) and signed ($10,250) acoustic guitars were also offered, each featuring Trump’s slogan, “Make America Great Again”, on its fretboard. The website also offered a Presidential Series guitar, in the Les Paul shape and with Trump’s name on the fretboard, and God Bless the USA acoustic guitars displaying that message, the title of a song by the country singer Lee Greenwood that is also affixed to Trump’s endorsed Bible.

You getcher Trump endorsed bible and your Trump-endorsed gun and you are set for life.



The real issues

Dec 25th, 2024 9:56 am | By

UK Women’s March has a statement about itself.

*Our Statement*

With Donald Trump set to return as US president in January 2025 and Nigel Farage picking up the anti-abortion mantle here in the UK, it’s time to make our voices heard.

We are marching because violence against women and girls in the UK has increased by 37% since 2018 and has now been declared a national emergency.

We are marching because abortion in England and Wales, if not carried out according to the strict requirements of the Abortion Act 1967, is technically still a criminal offence carrying a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

We are marching because reproductive rights are being removed state by state in the US making it increasingly more difficult to access safe abortions, and where vital healthcare is needed to save a woman’s life.

Big yes to transatlantic solidarity.

But then

We are marching because discrimination and violence against trans women and girls has increased around the world. Anti-trans rhetoric prevents women from addressing the real issues they encounter by reinforcing the gender stereotypes that have oppressed women for centuries.

No. It’s not a “gender stereotype” that men are not women. It’s not “anti-trans rhetoric” to point out that men are not women. Men helping themselves to everything that belongs to us, including even feminism, is what prevents women from addressing the real issues we encounter.

We are marching because women in Afghanistan under Taliban rule have been effectively silenced by being banned from speaking in public. They are no longer allowed to access education or work and are prevented from freedom of expression.

Indeed, and you know what? Those women are the real thing. The Taliban doesn’t bully and stifle and kill men who call themselves women, the Taliban bullies and stifles and kills women, real women, the kind that can get pregnant.

*Our feminism is intersectional*

Inclusivity is at the core of UK Women’s March. We acknowledge how race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability intersect. Women are exposed to racism, ageism, ableism, homophobia, and transphobia, not just sexism and misogyny. This means we must acknowledge how these differences interlock for feminism to work. 

Wrong. If you include men in feminism then it doesn’t work.



Peak democracy and civil society

Dec 25th, 2024 5:23 am | By

So now we’re a threat to democracy. Reduxx has the details:

The German federal government was responsible for funding a research project labeling “organized transphobia” a threat to democracy. The project, which was made in collaboration with a trans-identified male known for threatening violence against women he disagrees with, classifies those opposed to Germany’s radical gender self-identification laws as “enemies” of society.

Interesting. So a guy who threatens women with violence is fine, but women who say men are not women are threats to democracy.

Days ago, the Institute for Democracy and Civil Society (IDZ Jenapublished a brochure reporting the outcome of a research project it had undertaken on “Organized Transphobia: Concepts, Actors, Narratives, and Counter-Strategies.” In the 92-page release, it concluded that transphobia poses a danger to democratic co-existence and outlines strategies to tackle radical feminists who define biological sex as binary.

I have an idea: how about rounding up all those women and send them to camps where the authorities can keep an eye on them. Concentrate them all in these camps dotted around the country; what could go wrong?

The research project, published in collaboration with the Federal Association for Transgender People (BVT), was funded by the German government through the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth, which provided it a total of 228,833 Euros.

Wait what? This Federal Ministry includes women in its for-ness? But women are the enemy – that’s what this study found. Women are scary dangerous subversive people who need to be concentrated away from the decent German citizen.

The project portrays feminists critical of gender ideology as enemies of the state who, together with right-wing extremists, pursue a political agenda to maintain an “endo-cis-binary gender system” – something that is deemed incompatible with the “principles of liberal democracy.”

So true. Women are aliens. They don’t belong in Germany. They need their own homeland somewhere very cold and dry and empty, and meanwhile they need to be concentrated.

Meanwhile Germany has a new genner self-idennification bill.

The bill was first introduced in April of 2024, when the German Bundestag voted for the Self-Determination Act, which allows people to simply change their sex and first name at the registry office and threatens with a fine of €10,000 if someone reveals their previous first name and real sex. The Act came into effect on November 1.

Politicians who have expressed concerns about the bill and its impact on women and children have been faced criticism, even from within their own parties.

As previously reported by ReduxxGermany’s Free Democratic Party (FPD) is seeking to prohibit the re-election of two female members who voted against the law. Katja Adler and Linda Teuteberg are the only two women in the FDP who voted against the law, with both expressing concerns about the implications gender ideology has for women’s safety. As a result, the FDP is seeking to remove both of them from standing in the upcoming election, and replace them with members who supported the Self-Determination Act.

The new Utopia will have no women in it at all. Joy, freedom and safety at last.



Flattery

Dec 25th, 2024 5:01 am | By
Flattery

Oooh how thrilling.

https://twitter.com/lucyowenwales/status/1871823856492589075
Cool cool cool.

When’s the next minstrel show?



Collaboration

Dec 24th, 2024 3:02 pm | By

CNN on Trump’s noisy claims that Panama owes him a canal:

Panama President José Raúl Mulino posted a lengthy statement in Spanish and English on social media declaring ownership of the port “not negotiable.” Built at the turn of the 20th century, the canal was operated by the US until 1999, when it was fully turned over to Panama under a treaty signed by President Jimmy Carter two decades prior that guaranteed American use of the canal in perpetuity.

“I want to express precisely that every square meter of the Panama Canal and its adjacent area belong to Panama, and will continue to,” Mulino wrote.

The response did little to discourage Trump and his allies, though, who responded with memes and images on social media doubling down on his latest cause.

“Welcome to the United States Canal,” Trump posted on Truth Social, along with a picture of a US flag sailing on the waterway.

So if decorators redo the “salon” at Mar a Lago does that make the salon theirs?

If Trump hires a crew to build a house in Obama’s back garden does that make the house his? If Obama hires a crew to build a house at Mar a Lago does that make the house his?

Is Trump consistent in his claims about who owns what? Does he think all builders own what they build, while the owners of the land they build on are just tenants or trespassers?

Just curious.



Umbrage

Dec 24th, 2024 10:54 am | By

Yes come on, Nicola Sturgeon, explain what “shadowy forces” tricked us into believing that…er…men are not women.



Paradigm

Dec 24th, 2024 10:39 am | By

Behold, the women-hating piggy reveling in the revived fashion for hatred of women.

He does the “Karen” thing too. Piggy piggy piggy.



The surgeons have been working flat out

Dec 24th, 2024 9:55 am | By

Stephen Whittle, self-important, admits how risky and drastic all this “transitioning” is, apparently without noticing he’s doing so.

By “patient” and “patients” she means young girls.

Mangling female genitals is “complex and requires several procedures” and it’s risky, so don’t you dare say it shouldn’t be done.

RIP first do no harm.



Not a liberal-minded humanist

Dec 24th, 2024 9:41 am | By

Fariborz Pooya writes:

The Saudi Arabian doctor and psychiatrist Taleb A., who carried out an attack on the Magdeburg Christmas market on Friday evening, has terrorized the Central Council of Ex-Muslims and the Secular Refugee Aid for several years. He apparently shared beliefs from the far-right spectrum of the AfD and believed in a large-scale conspiracy aimed at Islamizing Germany. His delusional ideas went so far that he assumed that even organizations critical of Islamism were part of the Islamist conspiracy.

“The news of the attack on the Magdeburg Christmas market has shocked us!” said Mina Ahadi, chairwoman of the Central Council of Ex-Muslims, on Saturday morning. “The attacker Taleb A. is no stranger to us, because he has been terrorizing us for years. At first we suspected that he could be a mole in the Islamist movement. However, I now think that he is a psychopath who adheres to ultra-right conspiracy ideologies. After many years of experience, I can say: The Magdeburg attacker doesn’t just hate Muslims, but everyone who doesn’t share his hatred!”

Taleb A. criticized the “left-wing” humanist orientation of the Central Council of Ex-Muslims and the close friend Secular Refugee Aid, which specifically supports non-religious migrants from Islamic countries. “By no means all people who flee Islamic countries are Muslims. As an organization, we are explicitly critical of religion, but we don’t fight against liberal Muslims, but for them, because they are particularly often the victims of Islamism. This really upset Taleb A.!” says Mina Ahadi. “When he realized that his hatred of everything Muslim was not going down well with us, he started to publicly defame individual activists from the Secular Refugee Aid.”

Suspected motive: hatred not only of Muslims, but also of German authorities

Activists from the Secular Refugee Aid took action against the slander by Taleb A. In August 2023, it was ruled in court that Taleb A. must refrain from the slander, against which the Saudi doctor appealed. In the appeal hearing at the end of October 2024, it became clear that Taleb A. would not win the case, which prompted him to give an angry speech in court. He stated that he would save Europe from Islamization, something the German courts were not capable of doing.

Taleb A. had already indicated several times before that he wanted to make the Germans pay for ignoring the danger of Islamism. By mid-2024, his belief in right-wing conspiracy theories had become so entrenched that his hatred was no longer directed only against “the left,” but also against German authorities. In June, for example, he wrote on the X platform that, in his experience, “the German police are the real drivers of Islamism in Germany”: “We need the AfD to protect the police from themselves!” Following his posts on social media, an activist from the Secular Refugee Aid filed a criminal complaint against Taleb A. last year and warned the police of an attack that he was preparing. However, the State Criminal Police Office of Saxony-Anhalt concluded in its assessment that Taleb A. posed no concrete threat – wrongly, as the fateful attack in Magdeburg showed.

“Taleb A.’s terrorist act shows us that it is not only Islamists who attack Christmas markets with vehicles, but also right-wing conspiracy fanatics,” explained Michael Schmidt-Salomon, who, as board spokesman for the Giordano Bruno Foundation, oversaw the founding of the Central Council of Ex-Muslims and the Secular Refugee Aid. “For many years we have been pointing out how much Islamic fundamentalism and right-wing Islamophobia feed off each other. This has created a climate of hatred from which secular and liberal Muslims in particular suffer, as they are threatened not only by Islamists but also by right-wing ‘Islam critics’. I think it is high time to overcome the false identity perception patterns that underlie this hatred: There is no such thing as ‘the Muslims’, ‘the refugees’ or ‘the Islam critics’! At least this is what we should learn from the Magdeburg attack: Who in political Berlin would have expected that a doctor from Saudi Arabia and AfD sympathizer could carry out an attack on a German Christmas market in order to counter Islamism? The world is much more complex and crazy than is generally perceived.



Guest post: Failure to integrate

Dec 24th, 2024 4:37 am | By

Originally a comment by Der Durchwanderer on Known as a stalker and cyberbully.

Eugyppius has become a go-to for his cogent explanations and analysis of Germany’s socio-political peculairities, written in English for an international audience. He has gathered a sober accounting of the facts of this case as we yet know them without any real editorialising (though he makes some conclusions and opinions known in a few replies to comments), and it is well worth reading if you are truly interested in this incident.

The suspect seems to be severely mentally disturbed (perhaps ironically, or perhaps only to be expected, as he is a psychiatrist himself). It is incredibly unlikely that he is a sleeper agent for a Jihadist organisation, given his long history of vocal activism and his stated motivations for the attack (some of which were automatically posted minutes after the attack itself took place, and which, as Eugyppius notes, border on incoherence). He does not seem to be an active AfD supporter, but given his antipathy for the islamicisation of Europe he has probably seen them as an ally of convenience or has been well-disposed to some of their policies or public statements. (Whether any of this is enough to classify him, his deeds, or indeed the AfD itself as “right-wing extremist” is another topic. It suffices to note that the German media will trumpet any connections, and perhaps invent them, in order to make the AfD somehow cuplable. That is itself a shameful rhetorical game that nobody should give any credence to.)

But, as Richard notes, trying to find a coherent narrative or an active conspiracy is likely a fool’s errand. Whatever demons drove him to murder five people and injure hundreds more, on very nearly the eighth anniversary of the first such attack on German soil, the effect is no less a tragedy for those involved and for the nation as a whole. And however the German media wish to tar him or the AfD, it is a stark fact that an immigrant from the Middle East has yet again committed mass murder because the German government did not conform to his expectations, which has in the last decade become a regular occurrence (notwithstanding that the method of murder, driving a heavy vehicle into a crowd of people, has only happened twice now in this country).

The last such incident, at the end of summer in Solingen, saw a young man whose asylum claim had been denied but who had nevertheless been negligently allowed to remain stab several people to death at a “Festival of Diversity”. The incident before that happened in the middle of summer, when a vocal German anti-Islam activist was stabbed and a policeman was killed by knife-wielding maniac during a public speech against the islamicisation of Germany.

This country has done more in the last decade to save the lives of Muslims than any other on the planet has ever done for any group of foreigners. We have given housing and succour to literal millions of people from Syria (one out of every twenty pre-war Syrians lives in Germany), Afghanistan, and many other countries across the Middle East and North Africa, to the cost of billions of Euros. We have opened more mosques here than exist in the United States, and at least one major city (Cologne) has allowed the Islamic Call to Prayer to be sounded every Friday for the last two years (and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future). Every year, we allow in the equivalent of a mid-sized German city’s worth of Muslim refugees, with no end in sight. (Should Syria devolve yet again into active civil war, the influx is only going to go up.)

The ethnic and religious makeup of this country has, within a generation, permanently changed in a way that has historically only happened after losing a major war against an expanding empire…and all of this has been done of our own free will, out of the debts we owe the world and our moral conscience. (Also out of tribute to the American empire, whose wars and follies kicked off the instability which has flooded Europe with millions of Muslims seeking refuge.)

Yes, there is commonplace racism and ethnic tension. How could there not be, when millions of Muslims suddenly arrive in a dank, dark, cold country whose favourite beverage is beer and whose favourite meals all involve pork and butter? Yes, there are unfortunate cases of asylum claims being denied, there are frustrations with the grinding and faceless bureaucracy, and there is everyday discrimination in housing and employment.

But there are also schools and kindergardens where 80 percent of the children come from immigrant parents, where teachers have difficulty getting these majority-immigrant children to bother learning German, where the native German inhabitants are ostracised as “potatoes” and “Allmans”. There are quarters of major German cities where grown men will spit on you and call you a “fucking potato” if you look “too German”. There are upwards of two hundred incidents of gang rape every year (nearly one every day), half of whose perpetrators are not German citizens and, of the remainder, half of those have obviously non-German last names. (Incidents of individual sexual assault are even more frequent, with comparable demographics of the perpetrators.) And, semi-regularly, a madman murders people who’ve peacefully gathered to celebrate a holiday or town anniversary (or even the nebulous concept of “diversity” itself).

These are facts with which millions of Germans are confronted on a daily basis, and they are usually dismissed by the media and by the intelligentsia (when they are acknowledged at all) as “racist” or of being “instrumentalised” for right-wing propaganda…which, in these circles, is seen as refutation enough. Every such incident, from the everyday bullying to the near-daily sexual assault to the semi-annual mass murder, is laid at the feet of German society, as a “failure to integrate” the newcomers we have so welcomed and for whom we have already done so much.

Integration is a two-way street. Uprooting your life, moving thousands of kilometers, and finding yourself in a new culture is a harrowing and very difficult endeavour under the best of circumstances, much less fleeing a war and dealing with human traffickers along smuggling routes. It requires patience and indulgence on the part of the society, and fortitude and dilligence on the part of the individuals joining that society. I cannot for the life of me think of any way in which German society could be more patient and indulgent and accommodating than it has been over the last decade.

But that patience, and that indulgence, and that accommodation, are not limitless resources. Whatever this madman in Magdeburg thought he was doing, he has drained more of these resources, and made it just that little bit more likely that they will run out sooner rather than later.

And I shudder to think what might happen then.

Follow up comment:

Another cost Germany has incurred, which few people think about, is the continued out-migration of Jews. There are now fewer than a hundred thousand Jewish people in this country, and every year more and more Jewish people leave. Those who remain regularly face open hostility from Muslims (and even occasionally from left-wing anti-Israel activists, especially since the massacre of October 7th and the ensuing war). Every synagogue is under constant police protection to ward off an attack of the kind which occurred in Magdeburg.

Germany has a special obligation to Judaism and to the Jewish people, owing to the Holocaust. But it is far from impossible that left-wing policies and progressive cultural forces accomplish what the Nazis never quite managed to — to render Germany entirely free of Jews. That would also be a tragedy of historic proportions.



You know what else is an absolute necessity?

Dec 24th, 2024 4:07 am | By

Ominous.

President-elect Donald Trump shared his renewed interest Sunday in the U.S. controlling the autonomous territory of Greenland, which is owned by Denmark.

“For purposes of National Security and Freedom throughout the World, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity,” Trump wrote in a statement announcing that he had chosen Ken Howery to serve as ambassador to Denmark.

In other words Trump told Greenland and Denmark and the world that he intends to take Greenland by force.

He floated the idea last time he was “president” and Greenland said no you won’t.

At that point, Denmark said that Greenland was not for sale, which caused Trump to cancel a trip he had scheduled to the country. He said in a tweet that Denmark is “a very special country with incredible people, but based on Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen’s comments, that she would have no interest in discussing the purchase of Greenland, I will be postponing our meeting scheduled in two weeks for another time.”

Can we buy Trump and put him in a very small prison with no amenities?



Walking among them

Dec 23rd, 2024 11:14 am | By

Janice Turner gives us some background:

When Thibaut Rey was radioed by a colleague to say a man in the cosmetics department was behaving suspiciously, he went to the CCTV room to watch. It was late summer in Provence, so many women browsing the E.Leclerc hypermarket were bare-legged. Walking among them a man was carefully positioning a cool box beneath their skirts. Out of it poked a mobile phone.

The man, in his sixties, was deftly moving from woman to unwitting woman, and Rey, a security guard, was incensed. He ran on to the shop floor and grabbed the man’s arm. “You are a disgusting person,” he said. “I swear if she was my mother, I’d rip your head off.” One woman shrugged: she needed to finish her shopping. But Rey implored another to press charges and called the police.

Rey didn’t see the man’s snaps as a bit of fun. He thought of his responsibility for women’s safety and did his job. When police officers arrived they didn’t just reprimand this dirty-minded pensioner (as Paris cops had when they caught him in 2010) they scrolled through his phone, then went to his home and seized his computer. They too did their jobs. Because of Rey, who will now receive the Légion d’honneur, Dominique Pelicot was caught and he, along with 50 of the rapists he recruited to violate his wife, Gisèle, was brought to justice.

And because of all that we now know even more about the infinite contempt some men have for women.

Because it’s not just for sexy fun, now is it. If it were, you would only need the one, and you could get it much more easily than by prowling department stores to upskirt women. No: the force, the lack of consent, the insult, the creeping, the prying, the deception, the sneaking are what make it fun. Same with the drugging-to-rape.

This act of diligence by a decent man was pivotal. Yet so too was an act of dereliction by a careless woman in a key British case. Called to a drive-through McDonald’s in Swanley, Kent, where a man had exposed himself to female staff, PC Samantha Lee was handed CCTV footage, a car registration and credit card receipts. But shoving these in her pocket, Lee — who sold semi-clad selfies on the OnlyFans website as “Officer Naughty” — did not inquire further. Three days later that man, Wayne Couzens, killed Sarah Everard.

I wonder how Officer Naughty is doing now.

And anyone wondering if British men would participate in a degrading mass sexual encounter should consider the queue in the London Airbnb rented by an OnlyFans performer, Lily Phillips, in her quest to have sex with 100 men. Phillips was of course, unlike Gisèle Pelicot, fully consenting, although the stunt left her shaken and crying. But these men were waiting for a designated five minutes’ joyless, mechanical grind on a bed strewn with used condoms. What drew both groups of men to such depravity? The answer, no surprise, is online porn.

Plus deep-seated hatred of women.



Chex n balances

Dec 23rd, 2024 10:17 am | By

Why does Musk have so much power over the government and how can it be taken away?

…the billionaire tanked a bipartisan spending deal in the House last week and sent lawmakers scrambling.

Musk torched the plan to his 200 million followers on X, the social media platform he owns, and President-elect Donald Trump called on Republicans to reject the deal.

That’s part of the answer – he owns TwitterX and he abuses the power that gives him.

Musk was one of Trump’s biggest benefactors on the campaign trail and has been attached to the president-elect since his victory — weighing in on Cabinet appointments, meeting with foreign leaders and, increasingly, swaying dealmaking in Congress.

And that’s another part. Trump is stupid and weak, and Musk abuses the power that gives him.

But Musk’s ill-defined role raises questions about the unchecked influence of billionaires. He was not elected by voters or given a role in the new administration that’s subject to ethics rules or congressional oversight. And he’s vowed to fund primary challengers for lawmakers who don’t fall in line.

It’s not so much an ill-defined role as not a role at all. He’s just doing what he can get away with, and what he can get away with appears to be unlimited.