Stealth evangelists

Oh honestly.

Neil Shubin writes:

These have been inserted in copies of Your Inner Fish in various bookstores. I seriously doubt the folks who inserted them actually bothered to read the book.

George Gallup forsooth! It so happens he was my uncle. He wasn’t a statistician, he was a psychologist. He hired people to do the statistics. If he said that silly thing then more fool he.

 

Comments

9 responses to “Stealth evangelists”

  1. Blood Knight in Sour Armor Avatar
    Blood Knight in Sour Armor

    “Man cannot being to make an eye”

    Dafuq is a camera if not an eye? Hell we’ve got cameras now that can process higher fps than organic eyes do…

  2. Chuck Sullivan Avatar
    Chuck Sullivan

    Gallup’s you’re uncle, Well then Bob’s you’re uncle, or not.

  3. Silentbob Avatar

    George Gallup forsooth! It so happens he was my uncle.

    He can’t be. I consulted a genealogist and a statistician and they assured me that the odds of any given individual having George Gallup as their uncle purely by chance are astronomical.

    As further proof I ask readers to take this simple test:

    Do you have an uncle called George Gallop?

    Yes

    No

    (check one)

    I trust that settles the matter.

  4. Silentbob Avatar

    … And by astronomical I mean infinitesimal. The devil made me type that to deceive you.

  5. iknklast Avatar

    Actually, man would probably design a somewhat more functional eye. As a work of engineering, it’s a mess. Why would an all knowing god make such an obviously muddled job of it?

  6. iknklast Avatar

    And by man, I actually mean woman. ;-)

  7. John the Drunkard Avatar
    John the Drunkard

    Dawkins likes to point out that eyes have evolved multiple times. These dweebs are stuck on Paley’s watch.

    They are so isolated that the ‘Emperor is naked’ questions just don’t occur to them. And they are purdah’d away from any source that might make them think:

    ‘Who designed this amazing, unimaginable designer?’

    ‘Since no single person designed the entirety of a watch/eye in one act. Since both are made up of many parts which had OTHER functions previously. Why would anyone use them as examples of divine fiat?

  8. RJW Avatar

    Jeeeeeez!

    The eye did not form by ‘mere chance’, but by natural selection.

    Religiots have asked me what they assume is the ‘killer’ question. “What use is half an eye?” the answer, is of course is that half, or even 10% of an eye, ie a few light sensitive cells is very useful in evading predators.

    Many years ago when I was in a religious instruction class at my Grammar School (private high school) one smart arse asked the obvious question “Well, who made God?” That’s the real killer question.

  9. maddog1129 Avatar

    If that’s how they think evolution occurs, then they might as well be cartoons.