Trousers in flames

Sometimes the dishonesty is hard to believe.

The tweet:

Alison Phipps @alisonphipps
Seeing Indian surrogates described as ‘wombs for rent’ by British feminists seems deeply objectifying and disrespectful to me.

What Julie Bindel actually wrote:

Having heard many stories about how commonplace outsourcing pregnancy and reproduction is, I am in India to investigate the country’s “rent-a-womb” industry.

As a feminist campaigner against sexual abuse of women, and in particular the sex trade, I feel sick at the idea of wombs for rent. Sitting in the clinic, seeing smartly dressed women come in to access fertility services, all I could think about was how desperate a woman must be to carry a child for money. I know from other campaigners against womb trafficking that many surrogates are coerced by abusive husbands and pimps. Watching the smiling receptionist fill out forms on behalf of prospective commissioning parents, I could only wonder at the misery and pain experienced by the women who will end up being viewed as nothing but a vessel.

Alison Phipps is an academic. It is not possible that she misunderstood what Julie so plainly wrote there.

This is not my Left. I repudiate it. I sow salt in its fields.

Comments

4 responses to “Trousers in flames”

  1. John the Drunkard Avatar
    John the Drunkard

    Um…I think the tweet needs actual quoting. Or a live link.

  2. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    Damn! Sorry. It showed up as a tweet on the dashboard and I didn’t check the post.

  3. Jennifer Chavez Avatar
    Jennifer Chavez

    There’s back-and forth spurred by that tweet that includes the following comment:

    Slow Pulse Buoy ‏@nanayasleeps · 3h3 hours ago

    @JayneEEgerton @stavvers @alisonphipps #poeslaw and actually I’ve found ‘mums talking feminism’ to be violently oppressive environments, so.

  4. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    I saw that. Saw it, fumed, fumed some more.