happy #LesbianDayOfVisibility down with cis
Another day another woman suspended from Twitter for…this time it’s for telling a man, or boy, that he’s not a lesbian.
So this is what @jsoosty was banned for. Pictures explain: what she tweeted and what she was replying to. #TwitterHatesWomen pic.twitter.com/Z3ILtbWVEM
— anya in jail (@anyabyke) May 6, 2019
Let’s take a closer look at that photo.
happy #LesbianDayOfVisibility my self worth is directly tied to how fucked up my hair is. anyways down with cis
“down with cis” – down with 99.9% of people because they are not trans, but that’s just fine, while a woman telling him he’s not a lesbian merits suspension. Also, of course, while relentless harassment of women might as well be Twitter’s middle name.
Nobody gets to force people to believe fictions, especially not stupid fictions.
I’m 100% with ‘down with cis’. It’s a nonsensical, unnecessary modifier that needs to be consigned to the bin.
I propose that people who willingly accept and promote the label of “cis” (which, more and more seems to be used pejoratively), for themselves and enthusiastically apply it to others who do not accept it , be called “cissies.”
The ever insightful (inciteful?), sensitive and perseptive Lily Madigan had a thing or two to say on the Lesbian Day of Visibility:
https://twitter.com/realLilyMadigan/status/1121678156014833665
https://twitter.com/realLilyMadigan/status/1121808997760274432
Pathetic, sad, and scary at the same time. What he should be identifying as is an asshole.
And the idea that Lily Madigan is invisible? Nope, nope, nope. Lily Madigan cannot be ignored, because of sound and fury.
Snap. I did a post on those Madigan tweets.
Well double snap; that’s probably where I first saw saw them!
“Sound and fury” would go against Madigan’s being inaudible. I think the hair is what’s being used to counter invisibility.
I note one of Madigan’s followers offered to see if they could get a women fired for expressing the view that a trans women is not actually a women and Madigan was all in to that. Repulsive behaviour for a “Women’s Officer”.
YNnB @ 5 – I meant “snap” in the (original) UK sense – it’s what “jinx” means in the US – we both said/wrote that at [roughly] the same time. Not “snap” as in “gotcha!”
My “snap” was for me having forgotten that actually I’d seen it here in previous post, which I think is the Lithuanian use of the term…
lol