You or your oppressive views
Madigan is busy covering himself with glory as Labour Student Women’s Officer.
Can you post a picture of your membership card so I can report you to compliance and get you kicked out for some of your tweets which break rule 2.1.8 of the Labour Party rulebook?
— Lily Madigan (@realLilyMadigan) May 6, 2019
I don’t represent you or your oppressive views. pic.twitter.com/QzgnNW44is
— Lily Madigan (@realLilyMadigan) May 6, 2019
But he’s Labour Student Women’s Officer. Surely he’s supposed to represent (or advocate for or whatever it is that a student women’s officer does) her regardless of her views.
I haven’t broke any rules.
— Lily Madigan (@realLilyMadigan) May 6, 2019
I don’t know that that’s true, and I have my doubts, but even if it is true – what a rotten, psychopathic way to look at it. “There is no explicit rule against the Labour Student Women’s Officer telling women to go fuck themselves, so I as the Labour Student Women’s Officer am going to feel entirely free and entitled to tell women to go fuck themselves whenever I dislike what they think.”
If you’re outraged about me telling someone to fuck off who is going to court looking for permission to discriminate against (trans) women like me, you can fuck off as well, frankly. pic.twitter.com/rZBbzZaFqA
— Lily Madigan (@realLilyMadigan) May 6, 2019
That’s not what Maya Forstater is doing. She’s bringing a case against her firing from a job for tweets arguing that men are not women. That has nothing to do with “discriminating against” Madigan and people like Madigan. There is no “right” to force everyone to agree that men are women if they say they are. Refusing to agree that men are women if they say they are is not “discriminating against” those men.
I find it all so chilling. In the Gender Wars (and other theaters too now), there is no such thing as legitimate debate, disagreement, criticism, or even sincere questioning.
Everything is instantly, reflexively, recast as discrimination, bigotry, violence, and hatred.
And I think that’s the headline that filters down to most people: Did you hear about that vicious woman who was finally fired for threatening trans people?
As a citizen of the U.S.A., I also find there’s often a rush to judgment online for the sake of higher wokeness from some to the further left. This past year I’ve come to realize that women are at risk of losing a great deal of what was hard won over the past fifty years or so as gender has become fetishized and placed above the vital concerns of women. Adopting a feminine gender role does not make a man a woman, and it’s not discriminating against anyone to state that this is the case. Rather, it’s discriminating against women to force them to go along with accepting men as women in women’s personal spaces, as well as in sport.
Yep.
I believe SCOTUS just ok’ed the additions to the census that experts say are part of the campaign to increase the dis-disfranchisement of people likely to vote democrat to stave off the loss of Republican power associated with demographic changes and urbanization. Perhaps we can get the woke left to spend some time on this.
No, sorry, too busy spreading Peak Trans!
Maybe if the disenfranchised were identify as something we can get behind, we could help out, but right now, sorry, no, we’re too busy spreading Peak Trans!
Not Bruce, maybe if they identified as Trans American?
iknklast, isn’t that a railroad?
AoS – all the better. Two new identities rolled up into one.
Impulsive brutality, with a side-order of whining victimhood. Indistinguishable from Trumpists, Klansmen etc.