Just don’t defame & don’t vilify

Captain Clinch is gloating.

https://twitter.com/CaptainBridget/status/1303293253215682560

What is “vilify”? How is it defined? What’s the standard? What’s the threshold? How is the tension between “it is a crime to vilify” and the value of free speech resolved?

https://twitter.com/CaptainBridget/status/1303655771876409344

Exactly, to the minute, 24 hours between the two.

Comments

7 responses to “Just don’t defame & don’t vilify”

  1. zubanel Avatar

    does that include shunning?

  2. iknklast Avatar

    In other words, you have free speech as long as you don’t say anything I don’t like.

  3. Roj Blake Avatar

    iknklast, we don’t have a legislated right to free speech in Australia, only various conventions. The closest we came to that right was when the High Court ruled that there was an “implied right to free political speech.

    We also have a plague level of tribunals that operate outside the court system, and it was to one of these that Cap’n Bridie went to seek relief from the burden of not having her lies accepted as truths.

    Viva la TERFs!

  4. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    That’s interesting. From what do these tribunals derive their authority?

  5. Roj Blake Avatar

    State or territory governments.

    The initial idea was good, a smaller, easier to access tribunal to take the pressure off the courts in deciding minor matters. Sort of like a small claims court for human rights.

    Sadly, they have morphed into an amorphous collection of cliques and commissars.

  6. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    Thank you.

    How depressing.