Just disperse, bro

Sep 28th, 2021 9:13 am | By

A tweet by Ex-Muslims of North America inspired me to seek out the Quran Verse 53. It’s very amusing.

O you who believe, do not enter the houses of the Prophet, unless you are permitted for a meal, not (so early as) to wait for its preparation. But when you are invited, go inside. Then, once you have had the meal, just disperse, and (do) not (sit for long) being keen for a chat.

Heeheeheehee it’s so pious, so spiritual, so disinterested. Listen, guys, don’t keep showing up at my place hoping I’ll give you some lunch, wait until you’re fucking invited. And if I do invite you don’t fucking show up early – what am I supposed … Read the rest



Shouts and boos

Sep 28th, 2021 8:45 am | By

This isn’t in the news yet so a tweet will have to do.

Shouts of “shame” and boos because women say that women are women.

https://twitter.com/LabWomenDec/status/1442871252851609601… Read the rest


A mistake among the digital team

Sep 28th, 2021 7:43 am | By
A mistake among the digital team

The Times, annoyingly, says in the headline that Romero “apologized” for re-writing Ruth Bader Ginsburg. No he didn’t.

That’s not what happened.

Anthony Romero, the executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, said Monday that he regretted that a tweet sent out recently by his organization altered the words of a well-known quote by the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Yes he regretted it, but he didn’t apologize. Regretting something isn’t the same as apologizing for it. You can regret forgetting to get coffee at the store without apologizing for it.

The tweet by the A.C.L.U. occasioned mockery and some anger on social media from feminists and others.

Some anger? Lots of anger. White-hot anger.

“We won’t

Read the rest


Sorry you’re in such a snit

Sep 28th, 2021 6:42 am | By

Michelle Goldberg in the Times yesterday on the ACLU’s insult to RBG and women:

This was a mistake for two reasons, one that’s easy to talk about, and one that’s hard.

The easy one is the “it’s bad to re-write the past this way” reason.

What’s more difficult to discuss is how making Ginsburg’s words gender-neutral alters their meaning. That requires coming to terms with a contentious shift in how progressives think and talk about sex and reproduction. Changing Ginsburg’s words treats what was once a core feminist insight — that women are oppressed on the basis of their reproductive capacity — as an embarrassing anachronism. The question then becomes: Is it?

Of course, I don’t find that one … Read the rest



Dear readers

Sep 27th, 2021 4:15 pm | By

Naturally this isn’t going down well.

Read the rest



Dinosaurs

Sep 27th, 2021 3:46 pm | By

Labour List:

Shadow Justice Secretary David Lammy has told a Labour Party conference fringe event when discussing trans rights this morning that “there are some dinosaurs on the right” and also that “those dinosaurs exist in our own party” who want to “hoard rights”.

“Hoard rights”? Is that like hoarding sugar and butter during the war?

Asked at a fringe meeting today about the ongoing conflict in the party over the rights of transgender people, he said there is “always a debate when you’re extending rights to people who have been denied them for so long”.

What “rights” have trans people been denied for so long? The right to ignore gender conventions? Probably, somewhat, but then non-trans people have … Read the rest



Dear readers, here’s some bullshit

Sep 27th, 2021 12:03 pm | By

Oh please.

Blah blah blah blah fucking blah but when have they EVER talked about bodies with penises? Show me the cover that has “bodies with penises” on it. I’ll wait.… Read the rest



Harm on countless people

Sep 27th, 2021 10:23 am | By

Again. They’re appallingly consistent about this.

The ACLU has allowed the trans lobby – or maybe just Chase Strangio all by herself – to bully it into erasing women from its reporting and publicity.… Read the rest



Forced to say the word

Sep 27th, 2021 10:16 am | By

Oh no, the ACLU had to name the bill and the bill has the word “women” in the title.

Ewwww women’s ewwwww they must have been feeling very sick having to say that.

But they fixed it in the subsequent tweets.

Whew, that’s better! No more mention of women. Patients, people, we, … Read the rest



How to avoid saying “women”

Sep 27th, 2021 8:45 am | By

The ACLU is still at it (aka “doubling down”).

We? Who’s we? Who are “all of us”?

They mean women, of course, but they’re hell bent on not saying so. It’s Chase Strangio’s world now, and the only women who matter are men.

The linked article uses the word once. One single time. I suppose the word appears that one time so that women like me won’t be able to say never. But the grotesquely sanitized language remains. It’s written by Paige Alexandria … Read the rest



Look uh uh uh uh uh

Sep 27th, 2021 8:04 am | By

Another one of these. She barks like a seal at the sheer horror of being asked if women are allowed to talk about our own bodies now.

Read the rest



Analogy crime

Sep 27th, 2021 6:56 am | By
Analogy crime

Child Psychiatry Fellow at Stanford Medical School Jack Turban to Jessica Taylor in response to her objection to a man, Mridul Wadhwa, as director of a women’s rape crisis centre:

Women “demanding” female staff at rape crisis centers is not repeat not comparable to white people demanding white staff at anything. Women are not dominant over men, women don’t rape men, women are not the oppressor class in relation to men, women are not comparable to white people and men are not comparable to black people in discussions of power imbalance or dominance/subordination or perpetrator/victim or violence/injury.… Read the rest



Cholitas escaladoras

Sep 26th, 2021 3:14 pm | By

Something nice for a change!

In January 23, a group of five women climbers summitted Aconcagua, in Argentina, at 22,808 feet, the highest point in the Western and Southern Hemispheres. It took them seven days from when they started ascending the mountain’s flanks to when they safely returned to the bottom. This wouldn’t necessarily be noteworthy if not for the makeup of the crew.

They’re all Bolivian Aymara indigenous women who until recent years worked as cooks and caretakers for well-heeled, and mostly male, mountaineers from around the world. These women had been working at high camps for years, catering to the crews headed to the high peaks of the Andes. Finally, they decided to strap on crampons and hike

Read the rest


She stereotypes feminism beyond recognition

Sep 26th, 2021 10:46 am | By

Sonia Sodha on “white feminism”:

Blaming women for the ills of the world might appear an odd feminist call to action. But an idea gaining traction is that the “white feminism” dominant in the United States and the UK is not only a driving force of societal racism, but responsible for a host of other bad things, from the war on terror to the hypersexualisation of women in popular culture, to the dreadful abuses of power we see in international aid. It’s part of a growing tendency on the left to look for scapegoats at the cost of building the solidarity needed for social change.

It’s that and it’s also part of a longstanding tendency on the left to … Read the rest



Let’s hope it’s a lifetime of shame

Sep 26th, 2021 5:40 am | By

You have got to be kidding.

It shouldn’t be said. It’s not right.

So I guess it shouldn’t be said and it’s not right that women are the ones who gestate and give birth to all human beings without exception. I guess it shouldn’t be said and it’s not right that men can’t do either of those things. I guess it shouldn’t be said and it’s not right that men have always sought to harness and control that ability women have. I guess it shouldn’t be said and it’s not right that men are also bigger and stronger than women, and that those two facts combined are why … Read the rest



Who dragged SBM into a raging controversy?

Sep 25th, 2021 5:13 pm | By

So…

So that letter is here, and published with permission. Atwood sent it to several people.

Hi Steve,

Harriet has told me that you stated that her article “dragged SBM into a raging controversy.” She feels, and I agree, that it was your retracting that article and replacing it by very bad articles written by advocates of “gender affirmation” that dragged SBM into a raging controversy. I’ve attempted to explain why

Read the rest


A much tougher line

Sep 25th, 2021 4:45 pm | By

This very young MP is a piece of work.

That might sound reasonable if you didn’t know what zealots like this novice mean by “transphobia.” She doesn’t mean cruelty or persecution of trans people, she doesn’t mean inciting hatred of trans people (although she probably thinks she does), she means not agreeing that men are women if they say they are, and … Read the rest



Excuse us madam

Sep 25th, 2021 11:55 am | By

Yiiiiiiiiikes.

Read the rest



With another hole at the other end

Sep 25th, 2021 11:15 am | By

The Lancet’s “bodies with vaginas” tweet is getting scorching replies.

On the same day National Public Radio erased women from a story on abortion rights.

https://twitter.com/coccinellanovem/status/1441508423472877573 https://twitter.com/ShirTruth/status/1441814646990819328

https://twitter.com/yshmypk/status/1441741623382233088

Read the rest



Of bodies with vaginas

Sep 25th, 2021 10:47 am | By

The Lancet has tangled with the wrong crowd.

Read the rest