Inclusivity=exclusion of women

Oh yes, completely fair, nothing to dispute here.

https://twitter.com/coachblade/status/1469279036073467907

Being male is a proven unfair advantage in competing against women.

I daresay “Lia” Thomas would see the point if one or two or six other men decided they were most comfortable competing against him and the dwindling number of women who got that far.

Comments

5 responses to “Inclusivity=exclusion of women”

  1. GW Avatar

    So he should also be able to compete against children with disabiliities?

  2. iknklast Avatar

    The only way to say there is no proven advantage for men over women is to ignore centuries of science, not to mention common knowledge. Not to mention his own easy smashing of records set by hard working women who trained for a long time and are now just so much background to his fantasy.

  3. maddog1129 Avatar

    He LAPPED the women swimmers. There’s your “proven unfair advantage” right there. Liar and cheat.

  4. maddog1129 Avatar

    P.S., since when is elite sports competition about “comfort”?

    Besides, suddenly the women have NO category they “feel comfortable competing in.” So, yeah, “everyone” EXCEPT WOMEN.

  5. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    Always always always everyone except women.